Cargando…

Introducing in clinical practice a new laser suction handpiece for percutaneous nephrolithotomy

OBJECTIVE: To assess a novel combined laser suction handpiece (LSH) for performing PCNL in a clinical setting. METHODS: The study comprised 40 consecutive PCNLs performed between May 2019 and February 2020. The first 20 procedures (Group A) were performed with conventional ultrasonic or pneumatic de...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bar-Yaakov, Noam, Hertzberg, Haim, Marom, Ron, Jikia, Jemal, Mano, Roy, Beri, Avi, Yossepowitch, Ofer, Sofer, Mario
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9551316/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34256620
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/03915603211031874
_version_ 1784806071247831040
author Bar-Yaakov, Noam
Hertzberg, Haim
Marom, Ron
Jikia, Jemal
Mano, Roy
Beri, Avi
Yossepowitch, Ofer
Sofer, Mario
author_facet Bar-Yaakov, Noam
Hertzberg, Haim
Marom, Ron
Jikia, Jemal
Mano, Roy
Beri, Avi
Yossepowitch, Ofer
Sofer, Mario
author_sort Bar-Yaakov, Noam
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To assess a novel combined laser suction handpiece (LSH) for performing PCNL in a clinical setting. METHODS: The study comprised 40 consecutive PCNLs performed between May 2019 and February 2020. The first 20 procedures (Group A) were performed with conventional ultrasonic or pneumatic devices and the other 20 (Group B) were performed with the use of the new LSH. All patients were treated by tubeless supine PCNL. The groups were compared for demographics, clinical data, operative time, lithotrite effectiveness, stone clearance rate (SCR), and outcome. RESULTS: Groups A and B were similar in age, and in stone size, complexity, and density (Hounsfield units) (p < 0.05). The average operative time was 99 and 78 min, SCR 143 and 200 mm(3)/min, hospital stay 1.6 and 1.1 days, and stone-free rate 90% and 95%, respectively. Despite a trend toward better results with the new LSH, none of these comparisons reached statistical significance. Ineffective lithotripsy with the initial device (ultrasonic) requiring conversion to another modality (ballistic) occurred in six (30%) procedures in Group A, while all procedures were effectively accomplished with the LSH in Group B (p = 0.02). There were two complications in Group A and none in Group B (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The LSH is as effective and safe as the traditional lithotrites for performing PCNLs. This new tool completes the capabilities of the holmium laser high-power machines, enabling them to serve as the sole platform for all endourological treatments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9551316
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95513162022-10-12 Introducing in clinical practice a new laser suction handpiece for percutaneous nephrolithotomy Bar-Yaakov, Noam Hertzberg, Haim Marom, Ron Jikia, Jemal Mano, Roy Beri, Avi Yossepowitch, Ofer Sofer, Mario Urologia Original Articles OBJECTIVE: To assess a novel combined laser suction handpiece (LSH) for performing PCNL in a clinical setting. METHODS: The study comprised 40 consecutive PCNLs performed between May 2019 and February 2020. The first 20 procedures (Group A) were performed with conventional ultrasonic or pneumatic devices and the other 20 (Group B) were performed with the use of the new LSH. All patients were treated by tubeless supine PCNL. The groups were compared for demographics, clinical data, operative time, lithotrite effectiveness, stone clearance rate (SCR), and outcome. RESULTS: Groups A and B were similar in age, and in stone size, complexity, and density (Hounsfield units) (p < 0.05). The average operative time was 99 and 78 min, SCR 143 and 200 mm(3)/min, hospital stay 1.6 and 1.1 days, and stone-free rate 90% and 95%, respectively. Despite a trend toward better results with the new LSH, none of these comparisons reached statistical significance. Ineffective lithotripsy with the initial device (ultrasonic) requiring conversion to another modality (ballistic) occurred in six (30%) procedures in Group A, while all procedures were effectively accomplished with the LSH in Group B (p = 0.02). There were two complications in Group A and none in Group B (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The LSH is as effective and safe as the traditional lithotrites for performing PCNLs. This new tool completes the capabilities of the holmium laser high-power machines, enabling them to serve as the sole platform for all endourological treatments. SAGE Publications 2021-07-13 2022-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9551316/ /pubmed/34256620 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/03915603211031874 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Articles
Bar-Yaakov, Noam
Hertzberg, Haim
Marom, Ron
Jikia, Jemal
Mano, Roy
Beri, Avi
Yossepowitch, Ofer
Sofer, Mario
Introducing in clinical practice a new laser suction handpiece for percutaneous nephrolithotomy
title Introducing in clinical practice a new laser suction handpiece for percutaneous nephrolithotomy
title_full Introducing in clinical practice a new laser suction handpiece for percutaneous nephrolithotomy
title_fullStr Introducing in clinical practice a new laser suction handpiece for percutaneous nephrolithotomy
title_full_unstemmed Introducing in clinical practice a new laser suction handpiece for percutaneous nephrolithotomy
title_short Introducing in clinical practice a new laser suction handpiece for percutaneous nephrolithotomy
title_sort introducing in clinical practice a new laser suction handpiece for percutaneous nephrolithotomy
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9551316/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34256620
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/03915603211031874
work_keys_str_mv AT baryaakovnoam introducinginclinicalpracticeanewlasersuctionhandpieceforpercutaneousnephrolithotomy
AT hertzberghaim introducinginclinicalpracticeanewlasersuctionhandpieceforpercutaneousnephrolithotomy
AT maromron introducinginclinicalpracticeanewlasersuctionhandpieceforpercutaneousnephrolithotomy
AT jikiajemal introducinginclinicalpracticeanewlasersuctionhandpieceforpercutaneousnephrolithotomy
AT manoroy introducinginclinicalpracticeanewlasersuctionhandpieceforpercutaneousnephrolithotomy
AT beriavi introducinginclinicalpracticeanewlasersuctionhandpieceforpercutaneousnephrolithotomy
AT yossepowitchofer introducinginclinicalpracticeanewlasersuctionhandpieceforpercutaneousnephrolithotomy
AT sofermario introducinginclinicalpracticeanewlasersuctionhandpieceforpercutaneousnephrolithotomy