Cargando…

Effectiveness of a Multidisciplinary Team-Approach on Central-Line–Associated Bloodstream Infections

Background: Although there has been a significant reduction in central-line–associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) rates in the past decade with the implementation of evidence-based practices, an estimated 30,100 CLABSI occur each year in acute-care facilities. CLABSIs are associated with increas...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Suleyman, Geehan, Ahrens, Melissa, Keegan, Ann
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9551445/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ash.2021.13
_version_ 1784806101424799744
author Suleyman, Geehan
Ahrens, Melissa
Keegan, Ann
author_facet Suleyman, Geehan
Ahrens, Melissa
Keegan, Ann
author_sort Suleyman, Geehan
collection PubMed
description Background: Although there has been a significant reduction in central-line–associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) rates in the past decade with the implementation of evidence-based practices, an estimated 30,100 CLABSI occur each year in acute-care facilities. CLABSIs are associated with increased length of stay, cost, morbidity, and mortality, and they are preventable. In this study, we assessed the impact of a multidisciplinary team approach on CLABSI rates at a 319-bed teaching hospital in northwestern Ohio. Methods: In this before-and-after retrospective study, we compared the CLABSI rate per 1,000 central-line days, standardized infection ratio (SIR), and standardized utilization ratio (SUR) in the preintervention period (January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2018) to those of the intervention period (January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2020). Despite hospital-wide nursing education focusing on central-line maintenance in 2017, our SIR and SUR remained above the national benchmark. Starting in August 2018, we began to focus on insertion practices and physician education. An infection preventionist observed resident central-line insertion training and noted that there was no emphasis on infection prevention measures. There was a best practice knowledge gap. Thus, the indications for central-line use were updated, the insertion checklist was standardized, and the vascular access policy was revised to limit femoral and internal jugular vein use. Infection prevention training was provided to all providers involved in central-line insertions. Nurses were tasked with observing insertion of every central line and stopping the procedure if there is was an observed break in sterile technique. A central-line report listing indications and duration was developed and was sent to the nursing directors who assessed daily need with providers and prompted removal of unnecessary lines. The infection prevention medical director provided CLABSI prevention education to providers. Results: The CLABSI rate per 1,000 central-line days decreased from 0.90 in the preintervention period to 0.34 in the postintervention period, resulting in a 62% reduction in CLABSI rate. The SIR decreased from 0.886 to 0.323 (p-value <0.05), yielding a 64% reduction. The SUR also decreased from 1.156 to 0.874 (p-value <0.001) with a 24% reduction. Conclusion: A multidisciplinary team-approach with emphasis on standardized insertion checklist to ensure adherence to sterile technique and prompt removal of unnecessary central lines, and physician insertion training focusing on IP practices may potentially reduce CLABSI rates. Funding: No Disclosures: None
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9551445
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95514452022-10-12 Effectiveness of a Multidisciplinary Team-Approach on Central-Line–Associated Bloodstream Infections Suleyman, Geehan Ahrens, Melissa Keegan, Ann Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol Clabsi Background: Although there has been a significant reduction in central-line–associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) rates in the past decade with the implementation of evidence-based practices, an estimated 30,100 CLABSI occur each year in acute-care facilities. CLABSIs are associated with increased length of stay, cost, morbidity, and mortality, and they are preventable. In this study, we assessed the impact of a multidisciplinary team approach on CLABSI rates at a 319-bed teaching hospital in northwestern Ohio. Methods: In this before-and-after retrospective study, we compared the CLABSI rate per 1,000 central-line days, standardized infection ratio (SIR), and standardized utilization ratio (SUR) in the preintervention period (January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2018) to those of the intervention period (January 1, 2019, to December 31, 2020). Despite hospital-wide nursing education focusing on central-line maintenance in 2017, our SIR and SUR remained above the national benchmark. Starting in August 2018, we began to focus on insertion practices and physician education. An infection preventionist observed resident central-line insertion training and noted that there was no emphasis on infection prevention measures. There was a best practice knowledge gap. Thus, the indications for central-line use were updated, the insertion checklist was standardized, and the vascular access policy was revised to limit femoral and internal jugular vein use. Infection prevention training was provided to all providers involved in central-line insertions. Nurses were tasked with observing insertion of every central line and stopping the procedure if there is was an observed break in sterile technique. A central-line report listing indications and duration was developed and was sent to the nursing directors who assessed daily need with providers and prompted removal of unnecessary lines. The infection prevention medical director provided CLABSI prevention education to providers. Results: The CLABSI rate per 1,000 central-line days decreased from 0.90 in the preintervention period to 0.34 in the postintervention period, resulting in a 62% reduction in CLABSI rate. The SIR decreased from 0.886 to 0.323 (p-value <0.05), yielding a 64% reduction. The SUR also decreased from 1.156 to 0.874 (p-value <0.001) with a 24% reduction. Conclusion: A multidisciplinary team-approach with emphasis on standardized insertion checklist to ensure adherence to sterile technique and prompt removal of unnecessary central lines, and physician insertion training focusing on IP practices may potentially reduce CLABSI rates. Funding: No Disclosures: None Cambridge University Press 2021-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9551445/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ash.2021.13 Text en © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clabsi
Suleyman, Geehan
Ahrens, Melissa
Keegan, Ann
Effectiveness of a Multidisciplinary Team-Approach on Central-Line–Associated Bloodstream Infections
title Effectiveness of a Multidisciplinary Team-Approach on Central-Line–Associated Bloodstream Infections
title_full Effectiveness of a Multidisciplinary Team-Approach on Central-Line–Associated Bloodstream Infections
title_fullStr Effectiveness of a Multidisciplinary Team-Approach on Central-Line–Associated Bloodstream Infections
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of a Multidisciplinary Team-Approach on Central-Line–Associated Bloodstream Infections
title_short Effectiveness of a Multidisciplinary Team-Approach on Central-Line–Associated Bloodstream Infections
title_sort effectiveness of a multidisciplinary team-approach on central-line–associated bloodstream infections
topic Clabsi
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9551445/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ash.2021.13
work_keys_str_mv AT suleymangeehan effectivenessofamultidisciplinaryteamapproachoncentrallineassociatedbloodstreaminfections
AT ahrensmelissa effectivenessofamultidisciplinaryteamapproachoncentrallineassociatedbloodstreaminfections
AT keeganann effectivenessofamultidisciplinaryteamapproachoncentrallineassociatedbloodstreaminfections