Cargando…

Using Ultraviolet C (UVC) in Operating Rooms: A Hygiene Improvement

Background: Disinfection procedures are an essential aspect of preventing cross contamination, especially in situations where the risk of infection is higher, such as in operating rooms (ORs). Disinfection procedures in ORs at the end of each surgery session are not the same as final cleaning proced...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bosco, Roberta, Messina, Gabriele, Amodeo, Davide, Cevenini, Gabriele, Gambelli, Simona
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9551561/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ash.2021.123
_version_ 1784806130796462080
author Bosco, Roberta
Messina, Gabriele
Amodeo, Davide
Cevenini, Gabriele
Gambelli, Simona
author_facet Bosco, Roberta
Messina, Gabriele
Amodeo, Davide
Cevenini, Gabriele
Gambelli, Simona
author_sort Bosco, Roberta
collection PubMed
description Background: Disinfection procedures are an essential aspect of preventing cross contamination, especially in situations where the risk of infection is higher, such as in operating rooms (ORs). Disinfection procedures in ORs at the end of each surgery session are not the same as final cleaning procedures. We assessed the difference in microbial contamination between different levels of disinfection, before T(0) and after T(1) the use of an ultraviolet C device (UVC-D). Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted between December 2019 and August 2020 in a private clinic. Three sanitation levels (SL1–SL3) were compared for the reduction in colony-forming units (CFU) between T(0) and T(1): (1) no disinfection after surgery (SL1);, (2) after in-between cleaning (SL2), and (3) after terminal cleaning (SL3). UVC-D was used for 6 minutes, 3 minutes per bed side. Overall, 260 Petri dishes were used in 3 ORs, incubated at 36°C, and CFU were counted after 48 hours. Descriptive statistics, Wilcoxon test, and MANOVA for repeated measures were performed to verify the 95% statistical difference between T(0) and T(1), both on the whole sample and combined with the different SLs. Results: The unstratified analysis showed statistically significant differences (Wilcoxon test, p < 0.05) between T(0) and T(1), with means and standard deviations of 11.42 ± SD 41.19 CFU/PD and 5.91 ± SD 30.89, respectively. The Manova test for repeated measures, applied to 54 pairs of measurements, showed no significant difference between SLs in T(0)-T(1) CFU reduction. Overall, the mean percent reduction in CFU was 93.48% (CI95% = 86.97-99.99%). Conclusions: The results showed significant improvements in disinfection under any condition tested with UVC-D. Using the device immediately after surgery (SL1), before standard cleaning procedures, reduced CFUs by 97.3%. In some situations, UVC light was sufficient to reduce CFU to zero, even without chemical and mechanical cleaning. However, we do not recommend this approach; UVC light disinfection should be applied only after sanitization procedures because it does not remove dirt. Funding: UltraViolet Device, Inc Disclosures: None
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9551561
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95515612022-10-12 Using Ultraviolet C (UVC) in Operating Rooms: A Hygiene Improvement Bosco, Roberta Messina, Gabriele Amodeo, Davide Cevenini, Gabriele Gambelli, Simona Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol Environmental Cleaning Background: Disinfection procedures are an essential aspect of preventing cross contamination, especially in situations where the risk of infection is higher, such as in operating rooms (ORs). Disinfection procedures in ORs at the end of each surgery session are not the same as final cleaning procedures. We assessed the difference in microbial contamination between different levels of disinfection, before T(0) and after T(1) the use of an ultraviolet C device (UVC-D). Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted between December 2019 and August 2020 in a private clinic. Three sanitation levels (SL1–SL3) were compared for the reduction in colony-forming units (CFU) between T(0) and T(1): (1) no disinfection after surgery (SL1);, (2) after in-between cleaning (SL2), and (3) after terminal cleaning (SL3). UVC-D was used for 6 minutes, 3 minutes per bed side. Overall, 260 Petri dishes were used in 3 ORs, incubated at 36°C, and CFU were counted after 48 hours. Descriptive statistics, Wilcoxon test, and MANOVA for repeated measures were performed to verify the 95% statistical difference between T(0) and T(1), both on the whole sample and combined with the different SLs. Results: The unstratified analysis showed statistically significant differences (Wilcoxon test, p < 0.05) between T(0) and T(1), with means and standard deviations of 11.42 ± SD 41.19 CFU/PD and 5.91 ± SD 30.89, respectively. The Manova test for repeated measures, applied to 54 pairs of measurements, showed no significant difference between SLs in T(0)-T(1) CFU reduction. Overall, the mean percent reduction in CFU was 93.48% (CI95% = 86.97-99.99%). Conclusions: The results showed significant improvements in disinfection under any condition tested with UVC-D. Using the device immediately after surgery (SL1), before standard cleaning procedures, reduced CFUs by 97.3%. In some situations, UVC light was sufficient to reduce CFU to zero, even without chemical and mechanical cleaning. However, we do not recommend this approach; UVC light disinfection should be applied only after sanitization procedures because it does not remove dirt. Funding: UltraViolet Device, Inc Disclosures: None Cambridge University Press 2021-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9551561/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ash.2021.123 Text en © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Environmental Cleaning
Bosco, Roberta
Messina, Gabriele
Amodeo, Davide
Cevenini, Gabriele
Gambelli, Simona
Using Ultraviolet C (UVC) in Operating Rooms: A Hygiene Improvement
title Using Ultraviolet C (UVC) in Operating Rooms: A Hygiene Improvement
title_full Using Ultraviolet C (UVC) in Operating Rooms: A Hygiene Improvement
title_fullStr Using Ultraviolet C (UVC) in Operating Rooms: A Hygiene Improvement
title_full_unstemmed Using Ultraviolet C (UVC) in Operating Rooms: A Hygiene Improvement
title_short Using Ultraviolet C (UVC) in Operating Rooms: A Hygiene Improvement
title_sort using ultraviolet c (uvc) in operating rooms: a hygiene improvement
topic Environmental Cleaning
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9551561/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ash.2021.123
work_keys_str_mv AT boscoroberta usingultravioletcuvcinoperatingroomsahygieneimprovement
AT messinagabriele usingultravioletcuvcinoperatingroomsahygieneimprovement
AT amodeodavide usingultravioletcuvcinoperatingroomsahygieneimprovement
AT ceveninigabriele usingultravioletcuvcinoperatingroomsahygieneimprovement
AT gambellisimona usingultravioletcuvcinoperatingroomsahygieneimprovement