Cargando…

Identification of Potentially Unnecessary Micafungin Use Patterns: Opportunities for Antifungal Stewardship Interventions

Background: Echinocandins are used as first-line therapy for suspected and confirmed Candida spp, and its indiscriminate use may drive selection for echinocandin resistance. We evaluated patterns of use of micafungin to identify opportunities for antifungal stewardship. Methods: We identified all mi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Concha, Miguel Chavez, Hsueh, Kevin, Durkin, Michael, Spec, Andrej
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9551562/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ash.2021.60
_version_ 1784806131048120320
author Concha, Miguel Chavez
Hsueh, Kevin
Durkin, Michael
Spec, Andrej
author_facet Concha, Miguel Chavez
Hsueh, Kevin
Durkin, Michael
Spec, Andrej
author_sort Concha, Miguel Chavez
collection PubMed
description Background: Echinocandins are used as first-line therapy for suspected and confirmed Candida spp, and its indiscriminate use may drive selection for echinocandin resistance. We evaluated patterns of use of micafungin to identify opportunities for antifungal stewardship. Methods: We identified all micafungin completed orders and microbiological test result data from July 2018 to November 2020 among hospitalized patients in Barnes-Jewish Hospital. Continuous micafungin courses with <48 hours of interruption were considered independent courses. We evaluated micafungin use in 3 scenarios in which its use may be unnecessary: (1) patients with blood cultures negative for Candida spp, (2) patients with recovery of yeast or Candida spp from tracheal aspirates, and (3) patients with recovery of yeast or Candida spp from urine cultures. We only included micafungin courses if they were initiated within 5 days of blood culture collection or up to 4 days after tracheal or urine culture collection to account for incubation and decision to initiate treatment. Results: We found 3,381 micafungin courses in 3,287 admissions. Of these, 2,532 courses had blood culture collection around micafungin initiation and were included in the first analysis: 1,879 (74%) were negative, 149 (6%) had Candida spp isolated in the blood, and 504 (20%) had positive blood cultures for other organisms. Micafungin was given for a median duration of 3 days (IQR, 2–7) to those with negative blood cultures and for 3 days (IQR, 1–5) to those with positive blood cultures without candidemia (p < 0.001), and prolonged durations of more than 5 days was seen in 768/1879 (41%) and 143/504 (28%) of courses, respectively (p <0.001). A total of 487 micafungin courses were initiated after tracheal aspirate culture collection. Those with yeast isolated (n = 100, 21%) received similar micafungin duration compared to those that had no yeast isolated [3 (2-7 IQR) vs. 3 (2-7) days, respectively; p = 0.56). Finally, a total of 844 micafungin courses started after urine culture collection. A total of 49 (6%) had yeast isolated from the urine and treatment duration was similar to those that did not [3 (1-6 IQR) vs. 3 (2-6) days, respectively; p = 0.87). Conclusions: Echinocandin treatment courses did not differ when a yeast was identified from a tracheal isolate or urine specimen. However, a substantial proportion of treatment courses were prolonged in those with negative Candida spp in the blood, suggesting opportunities for antifungal stewardship interventions. Funding: No Disclosures: None
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9551562
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95515622022-10-12 Identification of Potentially Unnecessary Micafungin Use Patterns: Opportunities for Antifungal Stewardship Interventions Concha, Miguel Chavez Hsueh, Kevin Durkin, Michael Spec, Andrej Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol Antibiotic Stewardship Background: Echinocandins are used as first-line therapy for suspected and confirmed Candida spp, and its indiscriminate use may drive selection for echinocandin resistance. We evaluated patterns of use of micafungin to identify opportunities for antifungal stewardship. Methods: We identified all micafungin completed orders and microbiological test result data from July 2018 to November 2020 among hospitalized patients in Barnes-Jewish Hospital. Continuous micafungin courses with <48 hours of interruption were considered independent courses. We evaluated micafungin use in 3 scenarios in which its use may be unnecessary: (1) patients with blood cultures negative for Candida spp, (2) patients with recovery of yeast or Candida spp from tracheal aspirates, and (3) patients with recovery of yeast or Candida spp from urine cultures. We only included micafungin courses if they were initiated within 5 days of blood culture collection or up to 4 days after tracheal or urine culture collection to account for incubation and decision to initiate treatment. Results: We found 3,381 micafungin courses in 3,287 admissions. Of these, 2,532 courses had blood culture collection around micafungin initiation and were included in the first analysis: 1,879 (74%) were negative, 149 (6%) had Candida spp isolated in the blood, and 504 (20%) had positive blood cultures for other organisms. Micafungin was given for a median duration of 3 days (IQR, 2–7) to those with negative blood cultures and for 3 days (IQR, 1–5) to those with positive blood cultures without candidemia (p < 0.001), and prolonged durations of more than 5 days was seen in 768/1879 (41%) and 143/504 (28%) of courses, respectively (p <0.001). A total of 487 micafungin courses were initiated after tracheal aspirate culture collection. Those with yeast isolated (n = 100, 21%) received similar micafungin duration compared to those that had no yeast isolated [3 (2-7 IQR) vs. 3 (2-7) days, respectively; p = 0.56). Finally, a total of 844 micafungin courses started after urine culture collection. A total of 49 (6%) had yeast isolated from the urine and treatment duration was similar to those that did not [3 (1-6 IQR) vs. 3 (2-6) days, respectively; p = 0.87). Conclusions: Echinocandin treatment courses did not differ when a yeast was identified from a tracheal isolate or urine specimen. However, a substantial proportion of treatment courses were prolonged in those with negative Candida spp in the blood, suggesting opportunities for antifungal stewardship interventions. Funding: No Disclosures: None Cambridge University Press 2021-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9551562/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ash.2021.60 Text en © The Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Antibiotic Stewardship
Concha, Miguel Chavez
Hsueh, Kevin
Durkin, Michael
Spec, Andrej
Identification of Potentially Unnecessary Micafungin Use Patterns: Opportunities for Antifungal Stewardship Interventions
title Identification of Potentially Unnecessary Micafungin Use Patterns: Opportunities for Antifungal Stewardship Interventions
title_full Identification of Potentially Unnecessary Micafungin Use Patterns: Opportunities for Antifungal Stewardship Interventions
title_fullStr Identification of Potentially Unnecessary Micafungin Use Patterns: Opportunities for Antifungal Stewardship Interventions
title_full_unstemmed Identification of Potentially Unnecessary Micafungin Use Patterns: Opportunities for Antifungal Stewardship Interventions
title_short Identification of Potentially Unnecessary Micafungin Use Patterns: Opportunities for Antifungal Stewardship Interventions
title_sort identification of potentially unnecessary micafungin use patterns: opportunities for antifungal stewardship interventions
topic Antibiotic Stewardship
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9551562/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ash.2021.60
work_keys_str_mv AT conchamiguelchavez identificationofpotentiallyunnecessarymicafunginusepatternsopportunitiesforantifungalstewardshipinterventions
AT hsuehkevin identificationofpotentiallyunnecessarymicafunginusepatternsopportunitiesforantifungalstewardshipinterventions
AT durkinmichael identificationofpotentiallyunnecessarymicafunginusepatternsopportunitiesforantifungalstewardshipinterventions
AT specandrej identificationofpotentiallyunnecessarymicafunginusepatternsopportunitiesforantifungalstewardshipinterventions