Cargando…

Measure to improve: Is there a patient‐acuity measurement tool suitable for use in maternity service provision in the Netherlands? A systematic review

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: It is difficult to overestimate the importance of safe staffing levels within the context of effective, quality healthcare. Poor staffing has been cited as a contributory factor in the number of unnecessary hospital deaths. This is particularly so in maternity care, where poor s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cronie, Doug J., Rosman, Ageeth, Vries, Raymond de
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9552207/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36248352
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.756
_version_ 1784806204921348096
author Cronie, Doug J.
Rosman, Ageeth
Vries, Raymond de
author_facet Cronie, Doug J.
Rosman, Ageeth
Vries, Raymond de
author_sort Cronie, Doug J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: It is difficult to overestimate the importance of safe staffing levels within the context of effective, quality healthcare. Poor staffing has been cited as a contributory factor in the number of unnecessary hospital deaths. This is particularly so in maternity care, where poor staffing has been inexorably linked to avoidable perinatal and maternal mortality. In the Netherlands, maternity service provision (MSP) is stratified into primary (community)‐ and secondary (hospital)‐based care. While most midwives (71%) work in primary care, the majority are self‐employed or work in small group practices. Where women birth at home, one‐to‐one care during labor is the norm. However, despite the existence of a national standard for birth‐related care, which states unequivocally that women birthing in hospitals should (also) receive one‐to‐one care, while in labor this is not always the case. The extent of compliance with the national care standard has until now not been the subject of scrutiny. We aim to identify evidence for the use of patient‐acuity measurement tools (PAMTs) in MSP to explore the extent of one‐to‐one care for women birthing in hospitals in the Netherlands and select and/or modify a valid PAMT suitable for use in maternity units in hospitals in the Netherlands to assess to what extent the quality standard of one‐to‐one care for birthing women is being met. METHODS: In this systematic literature review, all citations are first screened for title and abstract, then full text for suitability of inclusion. RESULTS: Three studies were identified for inclusion in the review. One PAMT is recommended. CONCLUSION: One PAMT suitable for use in maternity service was identified. However, the evidence level for use is low. Nevertheless, in view of the unique nature of midwifery service provision, a PAMT specifically developed for use in maternity service is preferable.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9552207
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95522072022-10-14 Measure to improve: Is there a patient‐acuity measurement tool suitable for use in maternity service provision in the Netherlands? A systematic review Cronie, Doug J. Rosman, Ageeth Vries, Raymond de Health Sci Rep Original Research BACKGROUND AND AIMS: It is difficult to overestimate the importance of safe staffing levels within the context of effective, quality healthcare. Poor staffing has been cited as a contributory factor in the number of unnecessary hospital deaths. This is particularly so in maternity care, where poor staffing has been inexorably linked to avoidable perinatal and maternal mortality. In the Netherlands, maternity service provision (MSP) is stratified into primary (community)‐ and secondary (hospital)‐based care. While most midwives (71%) work in primary care, the majority are self‐employed or work in small group practices. Where women birth at home, one‐to‐one care during labor is the norm. However, despite the existence of a national standard for birth‐related care, which states unequivocally that women birthing in hospitals should (also) receive one‐to‐one care, while in labor this is not always the case. The extent of compliance with the national care standard has until now not been the subject of scrutiny. We aim to identify evidence for the use of patient‐acuity measurement tools (PAMTs) in MSP to explore the extent of one‐to‐one care for women birthing in hospitals in the Netherlands and select and/or modify a valid PAMT suitable for use in maternity units in hospitals in the Netherlands to assess to what extent the quality standard of one‐to‐one care for birthing women is being met. METHODS: In this systematic literature review, all citations are first screened for title and abstract, then full text for suitability of inclusion. RESULTS: Three studies were identified for inclusion in the review. One PAMT is recommended. CONCLUSION: One PAMT suitable for use in maternity service was identified. However, the evidence level for use is low. Nevertheless, in view of the unique nature of midwifery service provision, a PAMT specifically developed for use in maternity service is preferable. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-10-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9552207/ /pubmed/36248352 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.756 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Health Science Reports published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Cronie, Doug J.
Rosman, Ageeth
Vries, Raymond de
Measure to improve: Is there a patient‐acuity measurement tool suitable for use in maternity service provision in the Netherlands? A systematic review
title Measure to improve: Is there a patient‐acuity measurement tool suitable for use in maternity service provision in the Netherlands? A systematic review
title_full Measure to improve: Is there a patient‐acuity measurement tool suitable for use in maternity service provision in the Netherlands? A systematic review
title_fullStr Measure to improve: Is there a patient‐acuity measurement tool suitable for use in maternity service provision in the Netherlands? A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Measure to improve: Is there a patient‐acuity measurement tool suitable for use in maternity service provision in the Netherlands? A systematic review
title_short Measure to improve: Is there a patient‐acuity measurement tool suitable for use in maternity service provision in the Netherlands? A systematic review
title_sort measure to improve: is there a patient‐acuity measurement tool suitable for use in maternity service provision in the netherlands? a systematic review
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9552207/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36248352
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.756
work_keys_str_mv AT croniedougj measuretoimproveisthereapatientacuitymeasurementtoolsuitableforuseinmaternityserviceprovisioninthenetherlandsasystematicreview
AT rosmanageeth measuretoimproveisthereapatientacuitymeasurementtoolsuitableforuseinmaternityserviceprovisioninthenetherlandsasystematicreview
AT vriesraymondde measuretoimproveisthereapatientacuitymeasurementtoolsuitableforuseinmaternityserviceprovisioninthenetherlandsasystematicreview