Cargando…
In Search of a Universal Method: A Comparative Survey of Bottom-Up Proteomics Sample Preparation Methods
[Image: see text] Robust, efficient, and reproducible protein extraction and sample processing is a key step for bottom-up proteomics analyses. While many sample preparation protocols for mass spectrometry have been described, selecting an appropriate method remains challenging since some protein cl...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Chemical Society
2022
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9552232/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36006919 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jproteome.2c00265 |
_version_ | 1784806209933541376 |
---|---|
author | Varnavides, Gina Madern, Moritz Anrather, Dorothea Hartl, Natascha Reiter, Wolfgang Hartl, Markus |
author_facet | Varnavides, Gina Madern, Moritz Anrather, Dorothea Hartl, Natascha Reiter, Wolfgang Hartl, Markus |
author_sort | Varnavides, Gina |
collection | PubMed |
description | [Image: see text] Robust, efficient, and reproducible protein extraction and sample processing is a key step for bottom-up proteomics analyses. While many sample preparation protocols for mass spectrometry have been described, selecting an appropriate method remains challenging since some protein classes may require specialized solubilization, precipitation, and digestion procedures. Here, we present a comprehensive comparison of the 16 most widely used sample preparation methods, covering in-solution digests, device-based methods, and commercially available kits. We find a remarkably good performance of the majority of the protocols with high reproducibility, little method dependency, and low levels of artifact formation. However, we revealed method-dependent differences in the recovery of specific protein features, which we summarized in a descriptive guide matrix. Our work thereby provides a solid basis for the selection of MS sample preparation strategies for a given proteomics project. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9552232 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | American Chemical Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95522322022-10-12 In Search of a Universal Method: A Comparative Survey of Bottom-Up Proteomics Sample Preparation Methods Varnavides, Gina Madern, Moritz Anrather, Dorothea Hartl, Natascha Reiter, Wolfgang Hartl, Markus J Proteome Res [Image: see text] Robust, efficient, and reproducible protein extraction and sample processing is a key step for bottom-up proteomics analyses. While many sample preparation protocols for mass spectrometry have been described, selecting an appropriate method remains challenging since some protein classes may require specialized solubilization, precipitation, and digestion procedures. Here, we present a comprehensive comparison of the 16 most widely used sample preparation methods, covering in-solution digests, device-based methods, and commercially available kits. We find a remarkably good performance of the majority of the protocols with high reproducibility, little method dependency, and low levels of artifact formation. However, we revealed method-dependent differences in the recovery of specific protein features, which we summarized in a descriptive guide matrix. Our work thereby provides a solid basis for the selection of MS sample preparation strategies for a given proteomics project. American Chemical Society 2022-08-25 2022-10-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9552232/ /pubmed/36006919 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jproteome.2c00265 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Permits the broadest form of re-use including for commercial purposes, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Varnavides, Gina Madern, Moritz Anrather, Dorothea Hartl, Natascha Reiter, Wolfgang Hartl, Markus In Search of a Universal Method: A Comparative Survey of Bottom-Up Proteomics Sample Preparation Methods |
title | In Search
of a Universal Method: A Comparative Survey
of Bottom-Up Proteomics Sample Preparation Methods |
title_full | In Search
of a Universal Method: A Comparative Survey
of Bottom-Up Proteomics Sample Preparation Methods |
title_fullStr | In Search
of a Universal Method: A Comparative Survey
of Bottom-Up Proteomics Sample Preparation Methods |
title_full_unstemmed | In Search
of a Universal Method: A Comparative Survey
of Bottom-Up Proteomics Sample Preparation Methods |
title_short | In Search
of a Universal Method: A Comparative Survey
of Bottom-Up Proteomics Sample Preparation Methods |
title_sort | in search
of a universal method: a comparative survey
of bottom-up proteomics sample preparation methods |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9552232/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36006919 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jproteome.2c00265 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT varnavidesgina insearchofauniversalmethodacomparativesurveyofbottomupproteomicssamplepreparationmethods AT madernmoritz insearchofauniversalmethodacomparativesurveyofbottomupproteomicssamplepreparationmethods AT anratherdorothea insearchofauniversalmethodacomparativesurveyofbottomupproteomicssamplepreparationmethods AT hartlnatascha insearchofauniversalmethodacomparativesurveyofbottomupproteomicssamplepreparationmethods AT reiterwolfgang insearchofauniversalmethodacomparativesurveyofbottomupproteomicssamplepreparationmethods AT hartlmarkus insearchofauniversalmethodacomparativesurveyofbottomupproteomicssamplepreparationmethods |