Cargando…

In Search of a Universal Method: A Comparative Survey of Bottom-Up Proteomics Sample Preparation Methods

[Image: see text] Robust, efficient, and reproducible protein extraction and sample processing is a key step for bottom-up proteomics analyses. While many sample preparation protocols for mass spectrometry have been described, selecting an appropriate method remains challenging since some protein cl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Varnavides, Gina, Madern, Moritz, Anrather, Dorothea, Hartl, Natascha, Reiter, Wolfgang, Hartl, Markus
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2022
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9552232/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36006919
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jproteome.2c00265
_version_ 1784806209933541376
author Varnavides, Gina
Madern, Moritz
Anrather, Dorothea
Hartl, Natascha
Reiter, Wolfgang
Hartl, Markus
author_facet Varnavides, Gina
Madern, Moritz
Anrather, Dorothea
Hartl, Natascha
Reiter, Wolfgang
Hartl, Markus
author_sort Varnavides, Gina
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] Robust, efficient, and reproducible protein extraction and sample processing is a key step for bottom-up proteomics analyses. While many sample preparation protocols for mass spectrometry have been described, selecting an appropriate method remains challenging since some protein classes may require specialized solubilization, precipitation, and digestion procedures. Here, we present a comprehensive comparison of the 16 most widely used sample preparation methods, covering in-solution digests, device-based methods, and commercially available kits. We find a remarkably good performance of the majority of the protocols with high reproducibility, little method dependency, and low levels of artifact formation. However, we revealed method-dependent differences in the recovery of specific protein features, which we summarized in a descriptive guide matrix. Our work thereby provides a solid basis for the selection of MS sample preparation strategies for a given proteomics project.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9552232
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95522322022-10-12 In Search of a Universal Method: A Comparative Survey of Bottom-Up Proteomics Sample Preparation Methods Varnavides, Gina Madern, Moritz Anrather, Dorothea Hartl, Natascha Reiter, Wolfgang Hartl, Markus J Proteome Res [Image: see text] Robust, efficient, and reproducible protein extraction and sample processing is a key step for bottom-up proteomics analyses. While many sample preparation protocols for mass spectrometry have been described, selecting an appropriate method remains challenging since some protein classes may require specialized solubilization, precipitation, and digestion procedures. Here, we present a comprehensive comparison of the 16 most widely used sample preparation methods, covering in-solution digests, device-based methods, and commercially available kits. We find a remarkably good performance of the majority of the protocols with high reproducibility, little method dependency, and low levels of artifact formation. However, we revealed method-dependent differences in the recovery of specific protein features, which we summarized in a descriptive guide matrix. Our work thereby provides a solid basis for the selection of MS sample preparation strategies for a given proteomics project. American Chemical Society 2022-08-25 2022-10-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9552232/ /pubmed/36006919 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jproteome.2c00265 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Permits the broadest form of re-use including for commercial purposes, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Varnavides, Gina
Madern, Moritz
Anrather, Dorothea
Hartl, Natascha
Reiter, Wolfgang
Hartl, Markus
In Search of a Universal Method: A Comparative Survey of Bottom-Up Proteomics Sample Preparation Methods
title In Search of a Universal Method: A Comparative Survey of Bottom-Up Proteomics Sample Preparation Methods
title_full In Search of a Universal Method: A Comparative Survey of Bottom-Up Proteomics Sample Preparation Methods
title_fullStr In Search of a Universal Method: A Comparative Survey of Bottom-Up Proteomics Sample Preparation Methods
title_full_unstemmed In Search of a Universal Method: A Comparative Survey of Bottom-Up Proteomics Sample Preparation Methods
title_short In Search of a Universal Method: A Comparative Survey of Bottom-Up Proteomics Sample Preparation Methods
title_sort in search of a universal method: a comparative survey of bottom-up proteomics sample preparation methods
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9552232/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36006919
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.jproteome.2c00265
work_keys_str_mv AT varnavidesgina insearchofauniversalmethodacomparativesurveyofbottomupproteomicssamplepreparationmethods
AT madernmoritz insearchofauniversalmethodacomparativesurveyofbottomupproteomicssamplepreparationmethods
AT anratherdorothea insearchofauniversalmethodacomparativesurveyofbottomupproteomicssamplepreparationmethods
AT hartlnatascha insearchofauniversalmethodacomparativesurveyofbottomupproteomicssamplepreparationmethods
AT reiterwolfgang insearchofauniversalmethodacomparativesurveyofbottomupproteomicssamplepreparationmethods
AT hartlmarkus insearchofauniversalmethodacomparativesurveyofbottomupproteomicssamplepreparationmethods