Cargando…

Effects of pendulum appliance versus clear aligners in the vertical dimension during Class II malocclusion treatment: a randomized prospective clinical trial

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to compare the effects on vertical dentoskeletal dimension produced by Pendulum appliance and Clear Aligners in patients with Class II malocclusion. TRIAL DESIGN: This is a prospective two-arm parallel group randomized clinical trial with 1:1 allocation r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lione, Roberta, Balboni, Alessia, Di Fazio, Valentina, Pavoni, Chiara, Cozza, Paola
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9552402/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36217134
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02483-w
_version_ 1784806243583393792
author Lione, Roberta
Balboni, Alessia
Di Fazio, Valentina
Pavoni, Chiara
Cozza, Paola
author_facet Lione, Roberta
Balboni, Alessia
Di Fazio, Valentina
Pavoni, Chiara
Cozza, Paola
author_sort Lione, Roberta
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to compare the effects on vertical dentoskeletal dimension produced by Pendulum appliance and Clear Aligners in patients with Class II malocclusion. TRIAL DESIGN: This is a prospective two-arm parallel group randomized clinical trial with 1:1 allocation ratio. METHODS: The Pendulum Group (PG) consisted of 20 patients (15F, 5 M) with a mean age of 17.2 ± 4.3 years. The Clear Aligners Group (CAG) comprised 20 patients (13F, 7 M) with a mean age of 17.2 ± 3.2 years. Distalization’s protocol in PG involved the activation of TMA wires till the achievement of Class I molar relationship. A protocol of sequential distalization was applied in the CAG. For each subject lateral cephalograms have been analyzed before treatment (T1) and at the end of the therapy (T2). Descriptive statistics and statistical between-group comparisons (PG vs CAG) were calculated for the craniofacial starting forms at T1 and for the T2–T1 changes. Statistical between-group comparisons for the T2–T1 changes were performed with independent samples t-tests (P < 0.05). RESULTS: The PG showed significantly greater increases in SN^GoGn° when compared with CAG (+ 2.1 and − 0.3 degrees, respectively). Clockwise rotation of the occlusal plane with significantly greater increase of SN^POccl angle was observed in PG (+ 2.8 degrees) when compared with CAG (− 4.2 degrees). The PG revealed a significant increase in the N-Me variable with a mean change of + 4.4 mm compared to the CAG with mean values of − 1.2 mm. The PG showed an increase in the ArGo^GoMe angle (+ 0.7° degrees) compared to the CAG (− 3.4° degrees). The PG showed significantly greater increases in both maxillary and mandibular first molar to palatal plane (+ 1.3 and + 2.1 mm, respectively) when compared with CAG (− 0.9 and − 0.2 mm, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Upper molar distalization with clear aligners represents a valid alternative to non-extraction treatment of Class II malocclusion, reducing the extrusion of maxillary first molars and improving the management of the occlusal plane and vertical dimension. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05298280. Registered 28 March 2022—Retrospectively registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9552402
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95524022022-10-12 Effects of pendulum appliance versus clear aligners in the vertical dimension during Class II malocclusion treatment: a randomized prospective clinical trial Lione, Roberta Balboni, Alessia Di Fazio, Valentina Pavoni, Chiara Cozza, Paola BMC Oral Health Research BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to compare the effects on vertical dentoskeletal dimension produced by Pendulum appliance and Clear Aligners in patients with Class II malocclusion. TRIAL DESIGN: This is a prospective two-arm parallel group randomized clinical trial with 1:1 allocation ratio. METHODS: The Pendulum Group (PG) consisted of 20 patients (15F, 5 M) with a mean age of 17.2 ± 4.3 years. The Clear Aligners Group (CAG) comprised 20 patients (13F, 7 M) with a mean age of 17.2 ± 3.2 years. Distalization’s protocol in PG involved the activation of TMA wires till the achievement of Class I molar relationship. A protocol of sequential distalization was applied in the CAG. For each subject lateral cephalograms have been analyzed before treatment (T1) and at the end of the therapy (T2). Descriptive statistics and statistical between-group comparisons (PG vs CAG) were calculated for the craniofacial starting forms at T1 and for the T2–T1 changes. Statistical between-group comparisons for the T2–T1 changes were performed with independent samples t-tests (P < 0.05). RESULTS: The PG showed significantly greater increases in SN^GoGn° when compared with CAG (+ 2.1 and − 0.3 degrees, respectively). Clockwise rotation of the occlusal plane with significantly greater increase of SN^POccl angle was observed in PG (+ 2.8 degrees) when compared with CAG (− 4.2 degrees). The PG revealed a significant increase in the N-Me variable with a mean change of + 4.4 mm compared to the CAG with mean values of − 1.2 mm. The PG showed an increase in the ArGo^GoMe angle (+ 0.7° degrees) compared to the CAG (− 3.4° degrees). The PG showed significantly greater increases in both maxillary and mandibular first molar to palatal plane (+ 1.3 and + 2.1 mm, respectively) when compared with CAG (− 0.9 and − 0.2 mm, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Upper molar distalization with clear aligners represents a valid alternative to non-extraction treatment of Class II malocclusion, reducing the extrusion of maxillary first molars and improving the management of the occlusal plane and vertical dimension. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05298280. Registered 28 March 2022—Retrospectively registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov. BioMed Central 2022-10-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9552402/ /pubmed/36217134 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02483-w Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Lione, Roberta
Balboni, Alessia
Di Fazio, Valentina
Pavoni, Chiara
Cozza, Paola
Effects of pendulum appliance versus clear aligners in the vertical dimension during Class II malocclusion treatment: a randomized prospective clinical trial
title Effects of pendulum appliance versus clear aligners in the vertical dimension during Class II malocclusion treatment: a randomized prospective clinical trial
title_full Effects of pendulum appliance versus clear aligners in the vertical dimension during Class II malocclusion treatment: a randomized prospective clinical trial
title_fullStr Effects of pendulum appliance versus clear aligners in the vertical dimension during Class II malocclusion treatment: a randomized prospective clinical trial
title_full_unstemmed Effects of pendulum appliance versus clear aligners in the vertical dimension during Class II malocclusion treatment: a randomized prospective clinical trial
title_short Effects of pendulum appliance versus clear aligners in the vertical dimension during Class II malocclusion treatment: a randomized prospective clinical trial
title_sort effects of pendulum appliance versus clear aligners in the vertical dimension during class ii malocclusion treatment: a randomized prospective clinical trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9552402/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36217134
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02483-w
work_keys_str_mv AT lioneroberta effectsofpendulumapplianceversusclearalignersintheverticaldimensionduringclassiimalocclusiontreatmentarandomizedprospectiveclinicaltrial
AT balbonialessia effectsofpendulumapplianceversusclearalignersintheverticaldimensionduringclassiimalocclusiontreatmentarandomizedprospectiveclinicaltrial
AT difaziovalentina effectsofpendulumapplianceversusclearalignersintheverticaldimensionduringclassiimalocclusiontreatmentarandomizedprospectiveclinicaltrial
AT pavonichiara effectsofpendulumapplianceversusclearalignersintheverticaldimensionduringclassiimalocclusiontreatmentarandomizedprospectiveclinicaltrial
AT cozzapaola effectsofpendulumapplianceversusclearalignersintheverticaldimensionduringclassiimalocclusiontreatmentarandomizedprospectiveclinicaltrial