Cargando…

A Performance Comparison of Classification Algorithms for Rose Plants

One of the key roles of Botanists is to be able to recognize flowers. This role has become highly challenging given that the number of discovered flower types are nearing half a million. To support Botanists, Information Technology offers promising solutions. Specifically, machine learning technique...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Malik, Muzamil, Aslam, Waqar, Nasr, Emad Abouel, Aslam, Zahid, Kadry, Seifedine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9552688/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36238676
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/1842547
_version_ 1784806300532604928
author Malik, Muzamil
Aslam, Waqar
Nasr, Emad Abouel
Aslam, Zahid
Kadry, Seifedine
author_facet Malik, Muzamil
Aslam, Waqar
Nasr, Emad Abouel
Aslam, Zahid
Kadry, Seifedine
author_sort Malik, Muzamil
collection PubMed
description One of the key roles of Botanists is to be able to recognize flowers. This role has become highly challenging given that the number of discovered flower types are nearing half a million. To support Botanists, Information Technology offers promising solutions. Specifically, machine learning techniques are intrinsically appealing due to being precise enough as required. To this aim, two observations on flower leaves are relevant and leverage flower identification: one, flower plants exhibit unique features in their leaves thus allow distinction of their co-located flowers; two, leaves have a much longer life than flowers thus preserve identity properties longer. This paper proposes the use of machine learning-based identification of rose types by leveraging the features from their leaves. For this purpose, the performance of Naive Bayes, Generalized Linear Model, Multilayer Perceptron, Decision Tree, Random Forest, Gradient Boosted Trees, and Support Vector Machine has been analyzed. This study optimizes the RF model by investigating and tuning its various parameters such as the number of trees, the depth of trees, and splitting criteria. The best results are achieved with gain ratio because it takes more distinct values to avoid the problems associated with Information Gain. Optimizing the number of trees and the depth of trees of RF yield better accuracy than other models. Extensive experiments are performed to analyze the results of ensemble algorithms by using the voting method for each instance. Results suggest that the performance of ensemble classifiers is superior to that of individual models.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9552688
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95526882022-10-12 A Performance Comparison of Classification Algorithms for Rose Plants Malik, Muzamil Aslam, Waqar Nasr, Emad Abouel Aslam, Zahid Kadry, Seifedine Comput Intell Neurosci Research Article One of the key roles of Botanists is to be able to recognize flowers. This role has become highly challenging given that the number of discovered flower types are nearing half a million. To support Botanists, Information Technology offers promising solutions. Specifically, machine learning techniques are intrinsically appealing due to being precise enough as required. To this aim, two observations on flower leaves are relevant and leverage flower identification: one, flower plants exhibit unique features in their leaves thus allow distinction of their co-located flowers; two, leaves have a much longer life than flowers thus preserve identity properties longer. This paper proposes the use of machine learning-based identification of rose types by leveraging the features from their leaves. For this purpose, the performance of Naive Bayes, Generalized Linear Model, Multilayer Perceptron, Decision Tree, Random Forest, Gradient Boosted Trees, and Support Vector Machine has been analyzed. This study optimizes the RF model by investigating and tuning its various parameters such as the number of trees, the depth of trees, and splitting criteria. The best results are achieved with gain ratio because it takes more distinct values to avoid the problems associated with Information Gain. Optimizing the number of trees and the depth of trees of RF yield better accuracy than other models. Extensive experiments are performed to analyze the results of ensemble algorithms by using the voting method for each instance. Results suggest that the performance of ensemble classifiers is superior to that of individual models. Hindawi 2022-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9552688/ /pubmed/36238676 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/1842547 Text en Copyright © 2022 Muzamil Malik et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Malik, Muzamil
Aslam, Waqar
Nasr, Emad Abouel
Aslam, Zahid
Kadry, Seifedine
A Performance Comparison of Classification Algorithms for Rose Plants
title A Performance Comparison of Classification Algorithms for Rose Plants
title_full A Performance Comparison of Classification Algorithms for Rose Plants
title_fullStr A Performance Comparison of Classification Algorithms for Rose Plants
title_full_unstemmed A Performance Comparison of Classification Algorithms for Rose Plants
title_short A Performance Comparison of Classification Algorithms for Rose Plants
title_sort performance comparison of classification algorithms for rose plants
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9552688/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36238676
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/1842547
work_keys_str_mv AT malikmuzamil aperformancecomparisonofclassificationalgorithmsforroseplants
AT aslamwaqar aperformancecomparisonofclassificationalgorithmsforroseplants
AT nasremadabouel aperformancecomparisonofclassificationalgorithmsforroseplants
AT aslamzahid aperformancecomparisonofclassificationalgorithmsforroseplants
AT kadryseifedine aperformancecomparisonofclassificationalgorithmsforroseplants
AT malikmuzamil performancecomparisonofclassificationalgorithmsforroseplants
AT aslamwaqar performancecomparisonofclassificationalgorithmsforroseplants
AT nasremadabouel performancecomparisonofclassificationalgorithmsforroseplants
AT aslamzahid performancecomparisonofclassificationalgorithmsforroseplants
AT kadryseifedine performancecomparisonofclassificationalgorithmsforroseplants