Cargando…

Examining the differences between information professional groups in perceiving information ethics: An analytic hierarchy process study

Information and communication technology (ICT) has a great impact on contemporary society and people’s lives. Especially with the pervasive access to rapidly developing technology, the impact of ICT on society and human values, the norms of ICT use, and the ethical issues derived from them are beyon...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yueh, Hsiu-Ping, Huang, Ching-Yin, Lin, Weijane
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9552828/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36237692
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.954827
_version_ 1784806334146805760
author Yueh, Hsiu-Ping
Huang, Ching-Yin
Lin, Weijane
author_facet Yueh, Hsiu-Ping
Huang, Ching-Yin
Lin, Weijane
author_sort Yueh, Hsiu-Ping
collection PubMed
description Information and communication technology (ICT) has a great impact on contemporary society and people’s lives. Especially with the pervasive access to rapidly developing technology, the impact of ICT on society and human values, the norms of ICT use, and the ethical issues derived from them are beyond the past ethical framework and deserve more research attention. The purpose of this study was to explore the key factors that influence the decision-making behaviors of information professionals when they are faced with information ethics issues. The study adopted the analytic hierarchical process method to develop the evaluation framework and criteria for information professional ethics and employed the professional fields of library and information science and information technology as examples to compare whether information professionals in different fields make different judgments on the aforementioned decision-making criteria. The results of the study validated the professional information ethics hierarchy and criteria and contributed to the field of information ethics research by providing information on the aspects that need attention in the cultivation of professionals in different fields.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9552828
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95528282022-10-12 Examining the differences between information professional groups in perceiving information ethics: An analytic hierarchy process study Yueh, Hsiu-Ping Huang, Ching-Yin Lin, Weijane Front Psychol Psychology Information and communication technology (ICT) has a great impact on contemporary society and people’s lives. Especially with the pervasive access to rapidly developing technology, the impact of ICT on society and human values, the norms of ICT use, and the ethical issues derived from them are beyond the past ethical framework and deserve more research attention. The purpose of this study was to explore the key factors that influence the decision-making behaviors of information professionals when they are faced with information ethics issues. The study adopted the analytic hierarchical process method to develop the evaluation framework and criteria for information professional ethics and employed the professional fields of library and information science and information technology as examples to compare whether information professionals in different fields make different judgments on the aforementioned decision-making criteria. The results of the study validated the professional information ethics hierarchy and criteria and contributed to the field of information ethics research by providing information on the aspects that need attention in the cultivation of professionals in different fields. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-09-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9552828/ /pubmed/36237692 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.954827 Text en Copyright © 2022 Yueh, Huang and Lin. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Yueh, Hsiu-Ping
Huang, Ching-Yin
Lin, Weijane
Examining the differences between information professional groups in perceiving information ethics: An analytic hierarchy process study
title Examining the differences between information professional groups in perceiving information ethics: An analytic hierarchy process study
title_full Examining the differences between information professional groups in perceiving information ethics: An analytic hierarchy process study
title_fullStr Examining the differences between information professional groups in perceiving information ethics: An analytic hierarchy process study
title_full_unstemmed Examining the differences between information professional groups in perceiving information ethics: An analytic hierarchy process study
title_short Examining the differences between information professional groups in perceiving information ethics: An analytic hierarchy process study
title_sort examining the differences between information professional groups in perceiving information ethics: an analytic hierarchy process study
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9552828/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36237692
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.954827
work_keys_str_mv AT yuehhsiuping examiningthedifferencesbetweeninformationprofessionalgroupsinperceivinginformationethicsananalytichierarchyprocessstudy
AT huangchingyin examiningthedifferencesbetweeninformationprofessionalgroupsinperceivinginformationethicsananalytichierarchyprocessstudy
AT linweijane examiningthedifferencesbetweeninformationprofessionalgroupsinperceivinginformationethicsananalytichierarchyprocessstudy