Cargando…

Are preoperative phase-contrast CSF flow parameters ideal for predicting the outcome of shunt surgery in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus?

PURPOSE: Phase-contrast magnetic resonance (PC-MR) is widely used in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH), but its role in predicting prognosis remains controversial. To evaluate the effectiveness of preoperative PC-MR CSF flow measurement in predicting the clinical response...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: He, Wen-Jie, Zhang, Xie-jun, Xu, Qi-Zhong, Bai, Run-tao, Chen, Jia-kuan, Zhou, Xi, Xia, Jun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9552837/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36237632
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.959450
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: Phase-contrast magnetic resonance (PC-MR) is widely used in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH), but its role in predicting prognosis remains controversial. To evaluate the effectiveness of preoperative PC-MR CSF flow measurement in predicting the clinical response to shunt surgery in patients with iNPH. METHODS: Forty-six patients with definite iNPH were included between January 2018 and January 2022. PC-MR was used to evaluate CSF peak velocity (PV), average velocity, aqueductal stroke volume (ASV), net ASV, and net flow. The modified Rankin Scale (mRS), iNPH grading scale (iNPHGS), Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), and Timed 3-m Up and Go Test (TUG) were used for clinical assessment. The primary endpoint was the improvement in the mRS score 1 year after surgery, and the secondary endpoints were the iNPHGS, MMSE, and TUG scores at 1 year. Differences between shunt improvement and non-improvement groups, based on the clinical outcomes, were compared using the Mann-Whitney U-test, logistic regression models, and receiver operating characteristic curves. Correlations between CSF flow parameters and the baseline clinical outcomes were assessed using Spearman's correlation coefficient. RESULTS: No CSF parameters significantly differed between shunt improvement and non-improvement groups based on mRS and secondary outcomes. And all CSF parameters showed significant overlap in both shunt improvement and non-improvement groups based on mRS and secondary outcomes. Significant correlations between the mRS and iNPHGS scores, and PV, ASV, and net ASV were observed. CONCLUSION: While some preoperative PC-MR CSF flow parameters reflected the symptom severity of iNPH to a certain extent, they alone might not be ideal markers of shunt responsiveness.