Cargando…
Cognitive process underlying ultimatum game: An eye-tracking study from a dual-system perspective
According to the dual-system theories, the decisions in an ultimatum game (UG) are governed by the automatic System 1 and the controlled System 2. The former drives the preference for fairness, whereas the latter drives the self-interest motive. However, the association between the contributions of...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9552838/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36237663 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.937366 |
_version_ | 1784806336702185472 |
---|---|
author | Wei, Zi-Han Li, Qiu-Yue Liang, Ci-Juan Liu, Hong-Zhi |
author_facet | Wei, Zi-Han Li, Qiu-Yue Liang, Ci-Juan Liu, Hong-Zhi |
author_sort | Wei, Zi-Han |
collection | PubMed |
description | According to the dual-system theories, the decisions in an ultimatum game (UG) are governed by the automatic System 1 and the controlled System 2. The former drives the preference for fairness, whereas the latter drives the self-interest motive. However, the association between the contributions of the two systems in UG and the cognitive process needs more direct evidence. In the present study, we used the process dissociation procedure to estimate the contributions of the two systems and recorded participants eye movements to examine the cognitive processes underlying UG decisions. Results showed that the estimated contributions of the two systems are uncorrelated and that they demonstrate a dissociated pattern of associations with third variables, such as reaction time (RT) and mean fixation duration (MFD). Furthermore, the relative time advantage (RTA) and the transitions between the two payoffs can predict the final UG decisions. Our findings provide evidence for the independent contributions of preference for fairness (System 1) and self-interest maximizing (System 2) inclinations to UG and shed light on the underlying processes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9552838 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95528382022-10-12 Cognitive process underlying ultimatum game: An eye-tracking study from a dual-system perspective Wei, Zi-Han Li, Qiu-Yue Liang, Ci-Juan Liu, Hong-Zhi Front Psychol Psychology According to the dual-system theories, the decisions in an ultimatum game (UG) are governed by the automatic System 1 and the controlled System 2. The former drives the preference for fairness, whereas the latter drives the self-interest motive. However, the association between the contributions of the two systems in UG and the cognitive process needs more direct evidence. In the present study, we used the process dissociation procedure to estimate the contributions of the two systems and recorded participants eye movements to examine the cognitive processes underlying UG decisions. Results showed that the estimated contributions of the two systems are uncorrelated and that they demonstrate a dissociated pattern of associations with third variables, such as reaction time (RT) and mean fixation duration (MFD). Furthermore, the relative time advantage (RTA) and the transitions between the two payoffs can predict the final UG decisions. Our findings provide evidence for the independent contributions of preference for fairness (System 1) and self-interest maximizing (System 2) inclinations to UG and shed light on the underlying processes. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-09-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9552838/ /pubmed/36237663 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.937366 Text en Copyright © 2022 Wei, Li, Liang and Liu. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Wei, Zi-Han Li, Qiu-Yue Liang, Ci-Juan Liu, Hong-Zhi Cognitive process underlying ultimatum game: An eye-tracking study from a dual-system perspective |
title | Cognitive process underlying ultimatum game: An eye-tracking study from a dual-system perspective |
title_full | Cognitive process underlying ultimatum game: An eye-tracking study from a dual-system perspective |
title_fullStr | Cognitive process underlying ultimatum game: An eye-tracking study from a dual-system perspective |
title_full_unstemmed | Cognitive process underlying ultimatum game: An eye-tracking study from a dual-system perspective |
title_short | Cognitive process underlying ultimatum game: An eye-tracking study from a dual-system perspective |
title_sort | cognitive process underlying ultimatum game: an eye-tracking study from a dual-system perspective |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9552838/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36237663 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.937366 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT weizihan cognitiveprocessunderlyingultimatumgameaneyetrackingstudyfromadualsystemperspective AT liqiuyue cognitiveprocessunderlyingultimatumgameaneyetrackingstudyfromadualsystemperspective AT liangcijuan cognitiveprocessunderlyingultimatumgameaneyetrackingstudyfromadualsystemperspective AT liuhongzhi cognitiveprocessunderlyingultimatumgameaneyetrackingstudyfromadualsystemperspective |