Cargando…

Cognitive process underlying ultimatum game: An eye-tracking study from a dual-system perspective

According to the dual-system theories, the decisions in an ultimatum game (UG) are governed by the automatic System 1 and the controlled System 2. The former drives the preference for fairness, whereas the latter drives the self-interest motive. However, the association between the contributions of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wei, Zi-Han, Li, Qiu-Yue, Liang, Ci-Juan, Liu, Hong-Zhi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9552838/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36237663
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.937366
_version_ 1784806336702185472
author Wei, Zi-Han
Li, Qiu-Yue
Liang, Ci-Juan
Liu, Hong-Zhi
author_facet Wei, Zi-Han
Li, Qiu-Yue
Liang, Ci-Juan
Liu, Hong-Zhi
author_sort Wei, Zi-Han
collection PubMed
description According to the dual-system theories, the decisions in an ultimatum game (UG) are governed by the automatic System 1 and the controlled System 2. The former drives the preference for fairness, whereas the latter drives the self-interest motive. However, the association between the contributions of the two systems in UG and the cognitive process needs more direct evidence. In the present study, we used the process dissociation procedure to estimate the contributions of the two systems and recorded participants eye movements to examine the cognitive processes underlying UG decisions. Results showed that the estimated contributions of the two systems are uncorrelated and that they demonstrate a dissociated pattern of associations with third variables, such as reaction time (RT) and mean fixation duration (MFD). Furthermore, the relative time advantage (RTA) and the transitions between the two payoffs can predict the final UG decisions. Our findings provide evidence for the independent contributions of preference for fairness (System 1) and self-interest maximizing (System 2) inclinations to UG and shed light on the underlying processes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9552838
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95528382022-10-12 Cognitive process underlying ultimatum game: An eye-tracking study from a dual-system perspective Wei, Zi-Han Li, Qiu-Yue Liang, Ci-Juan Liu, Hong-Zhi Front Psychol Psychology According to the dual-system theories, the decisions in an ultimatum game (UG) are governed by the automatic System 1 and the controlled System 2. The former drives the preference for fairness, whereas the latter drives the self-interest motive. However, the association between the contributions of the two systems in UG and the cognitive process needs more direct evidence. In the present study, we used the process dissociation procedure to estimate the contributions of the two systems and recorded participants eye movements to examine the cognitive processes underlying UG decisions. Results showed that the estimated contributions of the two systems are uncorrelated and that they demonstrate a dissociated pattern of associations with third variables, such as reaction time (RT) and mean fixation duration (MFD). Furthermore, the relative time advantage (RTA) and the transitions between the two payoffs can predict the final UG decisions. Our findings provide evidence for the independent contributions of preference for fairness (System 1) and self-interest maximizing (System 2) inclinations to UG and shed light on the underlying processes. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-09-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9552838/ /pubmed/36237663 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.937366 Text en Copyright © 2022 Wei, Li, Liang and Liu. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Wei, Zi-Han
Li, Qiu-Yue
Liang, Ci-Juan
Liu, Hong-Zhi
Cognitive process underlying ultimatum game: An eye-tracking study from a dual-system perspective
title Cognitive process underlying ultimatum game: An eye-tracking study from a dual-system perspective
title_full Cognitive process underlying ultimatum game: An eye-tracking study from a dual-system perspective
title_fullStr Cognitive process underlying ultimatum game: An eye-tracking study from a dual-system perspective
title_full_unstemmed Cognitive process underlying ultimatum game: An eye-tracking study from a dual-system perspective
title_short Cognitive process underlying ultimatum game: An eye-tracking study from a dual-system perspective
title_sort cognitive process underlying ultimatum game: an eye-tracking study from a dual-system perspective
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9552838/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36237663
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.937366
work_keys_str_mv AT weizihan cognitiveprocessunderlyingultimatumgameaneyetrackingstudyfromadualsystemperspective
AT liqiuyue cognitiveprocessunderlyingultimatumgameaneyetrackingstudyfromadualsystemperspective
AT liangcijuan cognitiveprocessunderlyingultimatumgameaneyetrackingstudyfromadualsystemperspective
AT liuhongzhi cognitiveprocessunderlyingultimatumgameaneyetrackingstudyfromadualsystemperspective