Cargando…
The Unintended Benefits of the Conservation Reserve Program for Air Quality
The link between agriculture and air pollution is well‐established, as are the benefits of the US Department of Agriculture's Conservation Reserve Program (CRP). However, little research has linked CRP to air quality directly. This study aims to address this gap by modeling the relationship bet...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9553094/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36248061 http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2022GH000648 |
_version_ | 1784806392655249408 |
---|---|
author | Becker, Douglas A. Maas, Alexander Bayham, Jude Crooks, James |
author_facet | Becker, Douglas A. Maas, Alexander Bayham, Jude Crooks, James |
author_sort | Becker, Douglas A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The link between agriculture and air pollution is well‐established, as are the benefits of the US Department of Agriculture's Conservation Reserve Program (CRP). However, little research has linked CRP to air quality directly. This study aims to address this gap by modeling the relationship between CRP and fine particulate matter (PM(2.5)) concentrations at the county level from 2001 to 2016. Several econometric models are estimated with panel data while controlling for drought, population, and wildfire. Results show that CRP has a statistically significant negative effect on PM(2.5) concentrations. Using estimates from this model, we project an avoided 1,353 deaths, 1,687 deaths, and 3,022 deaths nationally in 2008 relative to three different counterfactual scenarios: all CRP acreage placed under cultivation, increased drought, and a combination of the first two. The value of the avoided mortality is estimated to be $9.5 billion, $11.8 billion, and $21.2 billion, respectively. These findings provide evidence that CRP may generate economic gains in terms of avoided mortality, well above the cost of the program. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9553094 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95530942022-10-14 The Unintended Benefits of the Conservation Reserve Program for Air Quality Becker, Douglas A. Maas, Alexander Bayham, Jude Crooks, James Geohealth Research Article The link between agriculture and air pollution is well‐established, as are the benefits of the US Department of Agriculture's Conservation Reserve Program (CRP). However, little research has linked CRP to air quality directly. This study aims to address this gap by modeling the relationship between CRP and fine particulate matter (PM(2.5)) concentrations at the county level from 2001 to 2016. Several econometric models are estimated with panel data while controlling for drought, population, and wildfire. Results show that CRP has a statistically significant negative effect on PM(2.5) concentrations. Using estimates from this model, we project an avoided 1,353 deaths, 1,687 deaths, and 3,022 deaths nationally in 2008 relative to three different counterfactual scenarios: all CRP acreage placed under cultivation, increased drought, and a combination of the first two. The value of the avoided mortality is estimated to be $9.5 billion, $11.8 billion, and $21.2 billion, respectively. These findings provide evidence that CRP may generate economic gains in terms of avoided mortality, well above the cost of the program. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-10-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9553094/ /pubmed/36248061 http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2022GH000648 Text en © 2022. The Authors. GeoHealth published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Geophysical Union. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Becker, Douglas A. Maas, Alexander Bayham, Jude Crooks, James The Unintended Benefits of the Conservation Reserve Program for Air Quality |
title | The Unintended Benefits of the Conservation Reserve Program for Air Quality |
title_full | The Unintended Benefits of the Conservation Reserve Program for Air Quality |
title_fullStr | The Unintended Benefits of the Conservation Reserve Program for Air Quality |
title_full_unstemmed | The Unintended Benefits of the Conservation Reserve Program for Air Quality |
title_short | The Unintended Benefits of the Conservation Reserve Program for Air Quality |
title_sort | unintended benefits of the conservation reserve program for air quality |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9553094/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36248061 http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2022GH000648 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT beckerdouglasa theunintendedbenefitsoftheconservationreserveprogramforairquality AT maasalexander theunintendedbenefitsoftheconservationreserveprogramforairquality AT bayhamjude theunintendedbenefitsoftheconservationreserveprogramforairquality AT crooksjames theunintendedbenefitsoftheconservationreserveprogramforairquality AT beckerdouglasa unintendedbenefitsoftheconservationreserveprogramforairquality AT maasalexander unintendedbenefitsoftheconservationreserveprogramforairquality AT bayhamjude unintendedbenefitsoftheconservationreserveprogramforairquality AT crooksjames unintendedbenefitsoftheconservationreserveprogramforairquality |