Cargando…

Distribution of ventilation and oxygenation in surgical obese patients ventilated with high versus low positive end-expiratory pressure: A substudy of a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Intra-operative ventilation using low/physiological tidal volume and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) with periodic alveolar recruitment manoeuvres (ARMs) is recommended in obese surgery patients. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effects of PEEP levels and ARMs on ventilation distri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ellenberger, Christoph, Pelosi, Paolo, de Abreu, Marcelo Gama, Wrigge, Hermann, Diaper, John, Hagerman, Andres, Adam, Yannick, Schultz, Marcus J., Licker, Marc
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9553219/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36093886
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0000000000001741
_version_ 1784806419743113216
author Ellenberger, Christoph
Pelosi, Paolo
de Abreu, Marcelo Gama
Wrigge, Hermann
Diaper, John
Hagerman, Andres
Adam, Yannick
Schultz, Marcus J.
Licker, Marc
author_facet Ellenberger, Christoph
Pelosi, Paolo
de Abreu, Marcelo Gama
Wrigge, Hermann
Diaper, John
Hagerman, Andres
Adam, Yannick
Schultz, Marcus J.
Licker, Marc
author_sort Ellenberger, Christoph
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Intra-operative ventilation using low/physiological tidal volume and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) with periodic alveolar recruitment manoeuvres (ARMs) is recommended in obese surgery patients. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effects of PEEP levels and ARMs on ventilation distribution, oxygenation, haemodynamic parameters and cerebral oximetry. DESIGN: A substudy of a randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Tertiary medical centre in Geneva, Switzerland, between 2015 and 2018. PATIENTS: One hundred and sixty-two patients with a BMI at least 35 kg per square metre undergoing elective open or laparoscopic surgery lasting at least 120 min. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomised to PEEP of 4 cmH(2)O (n = 79) or PEEP of 12 cmH(2)O with hourly ARMs (n = 83). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary endpoint was the fraction of ventilation in the dependent lung as measured by electrical impedance tomography. Secondary endpoints were the oxygen saturation index (SaO(2)/FIO(2) ratio), respiratory and haemodynamic parameters, and cerebral tissue oximetry. RESULTS: Compared with low PEEP, high PEEP was associated with smaller intra-operative decreases in dependent lung ventilation [-11.2%; 95% confidence interval (CI) -8.7 to -13.7 vs. -13.9%; 95% CI -11.7 to -16.5; P = 0.029], oxygen saturation index (-49.6%; 95% CI -48.0 to -51.3 vs. -51.3%; 95% CI -49.6 to -53.1; P < 0.001) and a lower driving pressure (-6.3 cmH(2)O; 95% CI -5.7 to -7.0). Haemodynamic parameters did not differ between the groups, except at the end of ARMs when arterial pressure and cardiac index decreased on average by -13.7 mmHg (95% CI -12.5 to -14.9) and by -0.54 l min(-1) m(-2) (95% CI -0.49 to -0.59) along with increased cerebral tissue oximetry (3.0 and 3.2% on left and right front brain, respectively). CONCLUSION: In obese patients undergoing abdominal surgery, intra-operative PEEP of 12 cmH(2)O with periodic ARMs, compared with intra-operative PEEP of 4 cmH(2)O without ARMs, slightly redistributed ventilation to dependent lung zones with minor improvements in peripheral and cerebral oxygenation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02148692, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9553219
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95532192022-10-14 Distribution of ventilation and oxygenation in surgical obese patients ventilated with high versus low positive end-expiratory pressure: A substudy of a randomised controlled trial Ellenberger, Christoph Pelosi, Paolo de Abreu, Marcelo Gama Wrigge, Hermann Diaper, John Hagerman, Andres Adam, Yannick Schultz, Marcus J. Licker, Marc Eur J Anaesthesiol Ventilation BACKGROUND: Intra-operative ventilation using low/physiological tidal volume and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) with periodic alveolar recruitment manoeuvres (ARMs) is recommended in obese surgery patients. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effects of PEEP levels and ARMs on ventilation distribution, oxygenation, haemodynamic parameters and cerebral oximetry. DESIGN: A substudy of a randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Tertiary medical centre in Geneva, Switzerland, between 2015 and 2018. PATIENTS: One hundred and sixty-two patients with a BMI at least 35 kg per square metre undergoing elective open or laparoscopic surgery lasting at least 120 min. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomised to PEEP of 4 cmH(2)O (n = 79) or PEEP of 12 cmH(2)O with hourly ARMs (n = 83). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary endpoint was the fraction of ventilation in the dependent lung as measured by electrical impedance tomography. Secondary endpoints were the oxygen saturation index (SaO(2)/FIO(2) ratio), respiratory and haemodynamic parameters, and cerebral tissue oximetry. RESULTS: Compared with low PEEP, high PEEP was associated with smaller intra-operative decreases in dependent lung ventilation [-11.2%; 95% confidence interval (CI) -8.7 to -13.7 vs. -13.9%; 95% CI -11.7 to -16.5; P = 0.029], oxygen saturation index (-49.6%; 95% CI -48.0 to -51.3 vs. -51.3%; 95% CI -49.6 to -53.1; P < 0.001) and a lower driving pressure (-6.3 cmH(2)O; 95% CI -5.7 to -7.0). Haemodynamic parameters did not differ between the groups, except at the end of ARMs when arterial pressure and cardiac index decreased on average by -13.7 mmHg (95% CI -12.5 to -14.9) and by -0.54 l min(-1) m(-2) (95% CI -0.49 to -0.59) along with increased cerebral tissue oximetry (3.0 and 3.2% on left and right front brain, respectively). CONCLUSION: In obese patients undergoing abdominal surgery, intra-operative PEEP of 12 cmH(2)O with periodic ARMs, compared with intra-operative PEEP of 4 cmH(2)O without ARMs, slightly redistributed ventilation to dependent lung zones with minor improvements in peripheral and cerebral oxygenation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02148692, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-11 2022-09-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9553219/ /pubmed/36093886 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0000000000001741 Text en Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the COVID-19 pandemic or until permissions are revoked in writing. Upon expiration of these permissions, PMC is granted a perpetual license to make this article available via PMC and Europe PMC, consistent with existing copyright protections.
spellingShingle Ventilation
Ellenberger, Christoph
Pelosi, Paolo
de Abreu, Marcelo Gama
Wrigge, Hermann
Diaper, John
Hagerman, Andres
Adam, Yannick
Schultz, Marcus J.
Licker, Marc
Distribution of ventilation and oxygenation in surgical obese patients ventilated with high versus low positive end-expiratory pressure: A substudy of a randomised controlled trial
title Distribution of ventilation and oxygenation in surgical obese patients ventilated with high versus low positive end-expiratory pressure: A substudy of a randomised controlled trial
title_full Distribution of ventilation and oxygenation in surgical obese patients ventilated with high versus low positive end-expiratory pressure: A substudy of a randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Distribution of ventilation and oxygenation in surgical obese patients ventilated with high versus low positive end-expiratory pressure: A substudy of a randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Distribution of ventilation and oxygenation in surgical obese patients ventilated with high versus low positive end-expiratory pressure: A substudy of a randomised controlled trial
title_short Distribution of ventilation and oxygenation in surgical obese patients ventilated with high versus low positive end-expiratory pressure: A substudy of a randomised controlled trial
title_sort distribution of ventilation and oxygenation in surgical obese patients ventilated with high versus low positive end-expiratory pressure: a substudy of a randomised controlled trial
topic Ventilation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9553219/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36093886
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0000000000001741
work_keys_str_mv AT ellenbergerchristoph distributionofventilationandoxygenationinsurgicalobesepatientsventilatedwithhighversuslowpositiveendexpiratorypressureasubstudyofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT pelosipaolo distributionofventilationandoxygenationinsurgicalobesepatientsventilatedwithhighversuslowpositiveendexpiratorypressureasubstudyofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT deabreumarcelogama distributionofventilationandoxygenationinsurgicalobesepatientsventilatedwithhighversuslowpositiveendexpiratorypressureasubstudyofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT wriggehermann distributionofventilationandoxygenationinsurgicalobesepatientsventilatedwithhighversuslowpositiveendexpiratorypressureasubstudyofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT diaperjohn distributionofventilationandoxygenationinsurgicalobesepatientsventilatedwithhighversuslowpositiveendexpiratorypressureasubstudyofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT hagermanandres distributionofventilationandoxygenationinsurgicalobesepatientsventilatedwithhighversuslowpositiveendexpiratorypressureasubstudyofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT adamyannick distributionofventilationandoxygenationinsurgicalobesepatientsventilatedwithhighversuslowpositiveendexpiratorypressureasubstudyofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT schultzmarcusj distributionofventilationandoxygenationinsurgicalobesepatientsventilatedwithhighversuslowpositiveendexpiratorypressureasubstudyofarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT lickermarc distributionofventilationandoxygenationinsurgicalobesepatientsventilatedwithhighversuslowpositiveendexpiratorypressureasubstudyofarandomisedcontrolledtrial