Cargando…
Distribution of ventilation and oxygenation in surgical obese patients ventilated with high versus low positive end-expiratory pressure: A substudy of a randomised controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Intra-operative ventilation using low/physiological tidal volume and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) with periodic alveolar recruitment manoeuvres (ARMs) is recommended in obese surgery patients. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effects of PEEP levels and ARMs on ventilation distri...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9553219/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36093886 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0000000000001741 |
_version_ | 1784806419743113216 |
---|---|
author | Ellenberger, Christoph Pelosi, Paolo de Abreu, Marcelo Gama Wrigge, Hermann Diaper, John Hagerman, Andres Adam, Yannick Schultz, Marcus J. Licker, Marc |
author_facet | Ellenberger, Christoph Pelosi, Paolo de Abreu, Marcelo Gama Wrigge, Hermann Diaper, John Hagerman, Andres Adam, Yannick Schultz, Marcus J. Licker, Marc |
author_sort | Ellenberger, Christoph |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Intra-operative ventilation using low/physiological tidal volume and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) with periodic alveolar recruitment manoeuvres (ARMs) is recommended in obese surgery patients. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effects of PEEP levels and ARMs on ventilation distribution, oxygenation, haemodynamic parameters and cerebral oximetry. DESIGN: A substudy of a randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Tertiary medical centre in Geneva, Switzerland, between 2015 and 2018. PATIENTS: One hundred and sixty-two patients with a BMI at least 35 kg per square metre undergoing elective open or laparoscopic surgery lasting at least 120 min. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomised to PEEP of 4 cmH(2)O (n = 79) or PEEP of 12 cmH(2)O with hourly ARMs (n = 83). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary endpoint was the fraction of ventilation in the dependent lung as measured by electrical impedance tomography. Secondary endpoints were the oxygen saturation index (SaO(2)/FIO(2) ratio), respiratory and haemodynamic parameters, and cerebral tissue oximetry. RESULTS: Compared with low PEEP, high PEEP was associated with smaller intra-operative decreases in dependent lung ventilation [-11.2%; 95% confidence interval (CI) -8.7 to -13.7 vs. -13.9%; 95% CI -11.7 to -16.5; P = 0.029], oxygen saturation index (-49.6%; 95% CI -48.0 to -51.3 vs. -51.3%; 95% CI -49.6 to -53.1; P < 0.001) and a lower driving pressure (-6.3 cmH(2)O; 95% CI -5.7 to -7.0). Haemodynamic parameters did not differ between the groups, except at the end of ARMs when arterial pressure and cardiac index decreased on average by -13.7 mmHg (95% CI -12.5 to -14.9) and by -0.54 l min(-1) m(-2) (95% CI -0.49 to -0.59) along with increased cerebral tissue oximetry (3.0 and 3.2% on left and right front brain, respectively). CONCLUSION: In obese patients undergoing abdominal surgery, intra-operative PEEP of 12 cmH(2)O with periodic ARMs, compared with intra-operative PEEP of 4 cmH(2)O without ARMs, slightly redistributed ventilation to dependent lung zones with minor improvements in peripheral and cerebral oxygenation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02148692, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9553219 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95532192022-10-14 Distribution of ventilation and oxygenation in surgical obese patients ventilated with high versus low positive end-expiratory pressure: A substudy of a randomised controlled trial Ellenberger, Christoph Pelosi, Paolo de Abreu, Marcelo Gama Wrigge, Hermann Diaper, John Hagerman, Andres Adam, Yannick Schultz, Marcus J. Licker, Marc Eur J Anaesthesiol Ventilation BACKGROUND: Intra-operative ventilation using low/physiological tidal volume and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) with periodic alveolar recruitment manoeuvres (ARMs) is recommended in obese surgery patients. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effects of PEEP levels and ARMs on ventilation distribution, oxygenation, haemodynamic parameters and cerebral oximetry. DESIGN: A substudy of a randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Tertiary medical centre in Geneva, Switzerland, between 2015 and 2018. PATIENTS: One hundred and sixty-two patients with a BMI at least 35 kg per square metre undergoing elective open or laparoscopic surgery lasting at least 120 min. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomised to PEEP of 4 cmH(2)O (n = 79) or PEEP of 12 cmH(2)O with hourly ARMs (n = 83). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary endpoint was the fraction of ventilation in the dependent lung as measured by electrical impedance tomography. Secondary endpoints were the oxygen saturation index (SaO(2)/FIO(2) ratio), respiratory and haemodynamic parameters, and cerebral tissue oximetry. RESULTS: Compared with low PEEP, high PEEP was associated with smaller intra-operative decreases in dependent lung ventilation [-11.2%; 95% confidence interval (CI) -8.7 to -13.7 vs. -13.9%; 95% CI -11.7 to -16.5; P = 0.029], oxygen saturation index (-49.6%; 95% CI -48.0 to -51.3 vs. -51.3%; 95% CI -49.6 to -53.1; P < 0.001) and a lower driving pressure (-6.3 cmH(2)O; 95% CI -5.7 to -7.0). Haemodynamic parameters did not differ between the groups, except at the end of ARMs when arterial pressure and cardiac index decreased on average by -13.7 mmHg (95% CI -12.5 to -14.9) and by -0.54 l min(-1) m(-2) (95% CI -0.49 to -0.59) along with increased cerebral tissue oximetry (3.0 and 3.2% on left and right front brain, respectively). CONCLUSION: In obese patients undergoing abdominal surgery, intra-operative PEEP of 12 cmH(2)O with periodic ARMs, compared with intra-operative PEEP of 4 cmH(2)O without ARMs, slightly redistributed ventilation to dependent lung zones with minor improvements in peripheral and cerebral oxygenation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02148692, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-11 2022-09-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9553219/ /pubmed/36093886 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0000000000001741 Text en Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the COVID-19 pandemic or until permissions are revoked in writing. Upon expiration of these permissions, PMC is granted a perpetual license to make this article available via PMC and Europe PMC, consistent with existing copyright protections. |
spellingShingle | Ventilation Ellenberger, Christoph Pelosi, Paolo de Abreu, Marcelo Gama Wrigge, Hermann Diaper, John Hagerman, Andres Adam, Yannick Schultz, Marcus J. Licker, Marc Distribution of ventilation and oxygenation in surgical obese patients ventilated with high versus low positive end-expiratory pressure: A substudy of a randomised controlled trial |
title | Distribution of ventilation and oxygenation in surgical obese patients ventilated with high versus low positive end-expiratory pressure: A substudy of a randomised controlled trial |
title_full | Distribution of ventilation and oxygenation in surgical obese patients ventilated with high versus low positive end-expiratory pressure: A substudy of a randomised controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Distribution of ventilation and oxygenation in surgical obese patients ventilated with high versus low positive end-expiratory pressure: A substudy of a randomised controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Distribution of ventilation and oxygenation in surgical obese patients ventilated with high versus low positive end-expiratory pressure: A substudy of a randomised controlled trial |
title_short | Distribution of ventilation and oxygenation in surgical obese patients ventilated with high versus low positive end-expiratory pressure: A substudy of a randomised controlled trial |
title_sort | distribution of ventilation and oxygenation in surgical obese patients ventilated with high versus low positive end-expiratory pressure: a substudy of a randomised controlled trial |
topic | Ventilation |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9553219/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36093886 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0000000000001741 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ellenbergerchristoph distributionofventilationandoxygenationinsurgicalobesepatientsventilatedwithhighversuslowpositiveendexpiratorypressureasubstudyofarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT pelosipaolo distributionofventilationandoxygenationinsurgicalobesepatientsventilatedwithhighversuslowpositiveendexpiratorypressureasubstudyofarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT deabreumarcelogama distributionofventilationandoxygenationinsurgicalobesepatientsventilatedwithhighversuslowpositiveendexpiratorypressureasubstudyofarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT wriggehermann distributionofventilationandoxygenationinsurgicalobesepatientsventilatedwithhighversuslowpositiveendexpiratorypressureasubstudyofarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT diaperjohn distributionofventilationandoxygenationinsurgicalobesepatientsventilatedwithhighversuslowpositiveendexpiratorypressureasubstudyofarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT hagermanandres distributionofventilationandoxygenationinsurgicalobesepatientsventilatedwithhighversuslowpositiveendexpiratorypressureasubstudyofarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT adamyannick distributionofventilationandoxygenationinsurgicalobesepatientsventilatedwithhighversuslowpositiveendexpiratorypressureasubstudyofarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT schultzmarcusj distributionofventilationandoxygenationinsurgicalobesepatientsventilatedwithhighversuslowpositiveendexpiratorypressureasubstudyofarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT lickermarc distributionofventilationandoxygenationinsurgicalobesepatientsventilatedwithhighversuslowpositiveendexpiratorypressureasubstudyofarandomisedcontrolledtrial |