Cargando…

Outcomes of Top-Down Holmium Laser Enucleation of Prostate for Recurrent/Residual Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: One-Year Follow-Up

MATERIALS AND METHODS: We carried out a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent top-down HoLEP for the management of recurrent BPH at our institution. Patients who had previously undergone TURP were assigned to group I, while those with no history of prostate surgery were allocated to group...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zakaria, Ahmed S., Hodhod, Amr, Abbas, Loay, Fathy, Moustafa, Abdul Hadi, Ruba, Shabana, Waleed, MacDonald, Anastasia Alexandra, Gamaleldin, Ahmed, Abdallah, Mohamed, Elgharbawy, Mohamed, Ahmad, Abdulrahman, Roos, Adam, Kotb, Ahmed, Shahrour, Walid, Elmansy, Hazem
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9553753/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36247205
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/5185114
_version_ 1784806548933967872
author Zakaria, Ahmed S.
Hodhod, Amr
Abbas, Loay
Fathy, Moustafa
Abdul Hadi, Ruba
Shabana, Waleed
MacDonald, Anastasia Alexandra
Gamaleldin, Ahmed
Abdallah, Mohamed
Elgharbawy, Mohamed
Ahmad, Abdulrahman
Roos, Adam
Kotb, Ahmed
Shahrour, Walid
Elmansy, Hazem
author_facet Zakaria, Ahmed S.
Hodhod, Amr
Abbas, Loay
Fathy, Moustafa
Abdul Hadi, Ruba
Shabana, Waleed
MacDonald, Anastasia Alexandra
Gamaleldin, Ahmed
Abdallah, Mohamed
Elgharbawy, Mohamed
Ahmad, Abdulrahman
Roos, Adam
Kotb, Ahmed
Shahrour, Walid
Elmansy, Hazem
author_sort Zakaria, Ahmed S.
collection PubMed
description MATERIALS AND METHODS: We carried out a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent top-down HoLEP for the management of recurrent BPH at our institution. Patients who had previously undergone TURP were assigned to group I, while those with no history of prostate surgery were allocated to group II. Preoperative clinical characteristics, enucleation time, resected tissue weight, morcellation time, energy used, and intraoperative and postoperative complications were recorded and statistically analyzed. Patients were followed up postoperatively at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. The evaluation included the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), quality of life assessment (QoL), maximum urinary flow rate (Q(max)), postvoid residual urine test (PVR), and continence status. RESULTS: Two hundred and sixty-nine patients were included in this study. Group I consisted of 68 patients with recurrent BPH, while group II included 201 patients. There were no statistically significant differences in preoperative characteristics between both groups. The median enucleation time for group I (67.5 min (25–200)) was not significantly longer than that for group II (60 min (19–165) (p=0.25)). Operative outcomes, including morcellation time, resected weight, catheter duration, and hospital stay, were comparable between both groups. At 1, 3, 6, and 12 months, all urinary functional outcomes showed significant improvement, and there were no significant differences between the two groups. At 3 months' follow-up, two patients in group I and three patients in group II experienced stress urinary incontinence (SUI). At the last follow-up visit, one patient from group I presented with persistent SUI. CONCLUSIONS: For managing recurrent and nonrecurrent cases of BPH, top-down HoLEP is safe with comparable urinary functional outcomes. Patients with a history of previous prostate surgery can be counselled that their prior transurethral procedure does not reduce the benefits of HoLEP.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9553753
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95537532022-10-13 Outcomes of Top-Down Holmium Laser Enucleation of Prostate for Recurrent/Residual Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: One-Year Follow-Up Zakaria, Ahmed S. Hodhod, Amr Abbas, Loay Fathy, Moustafa Abdul Hadi, Ruba Shabana, Waleed MacDonald, Anastasia Alexandra Gamaleldin, Ahmed Abdallah, Mohamed Elgharbawy, Mohamed Ahmad, Abdulrahman Roos, Adam Kotb, Ahmed Shahrour, Walid Elmansy, Hazem Adv Urol Research Article MATERIALS AND METHODS: We carried out a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent top-down HoLEP for the management of recurrent BPH at our institution. Patients who had previously undergone TURP were assigned to group I, while those with no history of prostate surgery were allocated to group II. Preoperative clinical characteristics, enucleation time, resected tissue weight, morcellation time, energy used, and intraoperative and postoperative complications were recorded and statistically analyzed. Patients were followed up postoperatively at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. The evaluation included the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), quality of life assessment (QoL), maximum urinary flow rate (Q(max)), postvoid residual urine test (PVR), and continence status. RESULTS: Two hundred and sixty-nine patients were included in this study. Group I consisted of 68 patients with recurrent BPH, while group II included 201 patients. There were no statistically significant differences in preoperative characteristics between both groups. The median enucleation time for group I (67.5 min (25–200)) was not significantly longer than that for group II (60 min (19–165) (p=0.25)). Operative outcomes, including morcellation time, resected weight, catheter duration, and hospital stay, were comparable between both groups. At 1, 3, 6, and 12 months, all urinary functional outcomes showed significant improvement, and there were no significant differences between the two groups. At 3 months' follow-up, two patients in group I and three patients in group II experienced stress urinary incontinence (SUI). At the last follow-up visit, one patient from group I presented with persistent SUI. CONCLUSIONS: For managing recurrent and nonrecurrent cases of BPH, top-down HoLEP is safe with comparable urinary functional outcomes. Patients with a history of previous prostate surgery can be counselled that their prior transurethral procedure does not reduce the benefits of HoLEP. Hindawi 2022-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9553753/ /pubmed/36247205 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/5185114 Text en Copyright © 2022 Ahmed S. Zakaria et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zakaria, Ahmed S.
Hodhod, Amr
Abbas, Loay
Fathy, Moustafa
Abdul Hadi, Ruba
Shabana, Waleed
MacDonald, Anastasia Alexandra
Gamaleldin, Ahmed
Abdallah, Mohamed
Elgharbawy, Mohamed
Ahmad, Abdulrahman
Roos, Adam
Kotb, Ahmed
Shahrour, Walid
Elmansy, Hazem
Outcomes of Top-Down Holmium Laser Enucleation of Prostate for Recurrent/Residual Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: One-Year Follow-Up
title Outcomes of Top-Down Holmium Laser Enucleation of Prostate for Recurrent/Residual Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: One-Year Follow-Up
title_full Outcomes of Top-Down Holmium Laser Enucleation of Prostate for Recurrent/Residual Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: One-Year Follow-Up
title_fullStr Outcomes of Top-Down Holmium Laser Enucleation of Prostate for Recurrent/Residual Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: One-Year Follow-Up
title_full_unstemmed Outcomes of Top-Down Holmium Laser Enucleation of Prostate for Recurrent/Residual Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: One-Year Follow-Up
title_short Outcomes of Top-Down Holmium Laser Enucleation of Prostate for Recurrent/Residual Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: One-Year Follow-Up
title_sort outcomes of top-down holmium laser enucleation of prostate for recurrent/residual benign prostatic hyperplasia: one-year follow-up
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9553753/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36247205
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/5185114
work_keys_str_mv AT zakariaahmeds outcomesoftopdownholmiumlaserenucleationofprostateforrecurrentresidualbenignprostatichyperplasiaoneyearfollowup
AT hodhodamr outcomesoftopdownholmiumlaserenucleationofprostateforrecurrentresidualbenignprostatichyperplasiaoneyearfollowup
AT abbasloay outcomesoftopdownholmiumlaserenucleationofprostateforrecurrentresidualbenignprostatichyperplasiaoneyearfollowup
AT fathymoustafa outcomesoftopdownholmiumlaserenucleationofprostateforrecurrentresidualbenignprostatichyperplasiaoneyearfollowup
AT abdulhadiruba outcomesoftopdownholmiumlaserenucleationofprostateforrecurrentresidualbenignprostatichyperplasiaoneyearfollowup
AT shabanawaleed outcomesoftopdownholmiumlaserenucleationofprostateforrecurrentresidualbenignprostatichyperplasiaoneyearfollowup
AT macdonaldanastasiaalexandra outcomesoftopdownholmiumlaserenucleationofprostateforrecurrentresidualbenignprostatichyperplasiaoneyearfollowup
AT gamaleldinahmed outcomesoftopdownholmiumlaserenucleationofprostateforrecurrentresidualbenignprostatichyperplasiaoneyearfollowup
AT abdallahmohamed outcomesoftopdownholmiumlaserenucleationofprostateforrecurrentresidualbenignprostatichyperplasiaoneyearfollowup
AT elgharbawymohamed outcomesoftopdownholmiumlaserenucleationofprostateforrecurrentresidualbenignprostatichyperplasiaoneyearfollowup
AT ahmadabdulrahman outcomesoftopdownholmiumlaserenucleationofprostateforrecurrentresidualbenignprostatichyperplasiaoneyearfollowup
AT roosadam outcomesoftopdownholmiumlaserenucleationofprostateforrecurrentresidualbenignprostatichyperplasiaoneyearfollowup
AT kotbahmed outcomesoftopdownholmiumlaserenucleationofprostateforrecurrentresidualbenignprostatichyperplasiaoneyearfollowup
AT shahrourwalid outcomesoftopdownholmiumlaserenucleationofprostateforrecurrentresidualbenignprostatichyperplasiaoneyearfollowup
AT elmansyhazem outcomesoftopdownholmiumlaserenucleationofprostateforrecurrentresidualbenignprostatichyperplasiaoneyearfollowup