Cargando…
Outcomes of Top-Down Holmium Laser Enucleation of Prostate for Recurrent/Residual Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: One-Year Follow-Up
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We carried out a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent top-down HoLEP for the management of recurrent BPH at our institution. Patients who had previously undergone TURP were assigned to group I, while those with no history of prostate surgery were allocated to group...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9553753/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36247205 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/5185114 |
_version_ | 1784806548933967872 |
---|---|
author | Zakaria, Ahmed S. Hodhod, Amr Abbas, Loay Fathy, Moustafa Abdul Hadi, Ruba Shabana, Waleed MacDonald, Anastasia Alexandra Gamaleldin, Ahmed Abdallah, Mohamed Elgharbawy, Mohamed Ahmad, Abdulrahman Roos, Adam Kotb, Ahmed Shahrour, Walid Elmansy, Hazem |
author_facet | Zakaria, Ahmed S. Hodhod, Amr Abbas, Loay Fathy, Moustafa Abdul Hadi, Ruba Shabana, Waleed MacDonald, Anastasia Alexandra Gamaleldin, Ahmed Abdallah, Mohamed Elgharbawy, Mohamed Ahmad, Abdulrahman Roos, Adam Kotb, Ahmed Shahrour, Walid Elmansy, Hazem |
author_sort | Zakaria, Ahmed S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | MATERIALS AND METHODS: We carried out a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent top-down HoLEP for the management of recurrent BPH at our institution. Patients who had previously undergone TURP were assigned to group I, while those with no history of prostate surgery were allocated to group II. Preoperative clinical characteristics, enucleation time, resected tissue weight, morcellation time, energy used, and intraoperative and postoperative complications were recorded and statistically analyzed. Patients were followed up postoperatively at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. The evaluation included the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), quality of life assessment (QoL), maximum urinary flow rate (Q(max)), postvoid residual urine test (PVR), and continence status. RESULTS: Two hundred and sixty-nine patients were included in this study. Group I consisted of 68 patients with recurrent BPH, while group II included 201 patients. There were no statistically significant differences in preoperative characteristics between both groups. The median enucleation time for group I (67.5 min (25–200)) was not significantly longer than that for group II (60 min (19–165) (p=0.25)). Operative outcomes, including morcellation time, resected weight, catheter duration, and hospital stay, were comparable between both groups. At 1, 3, 6, and 12 months, all urinary functional outcomes showed significant improvement, and there were no significant differences between the two groups. At 3 months' follow-up, two patients in group I and three patients in group II experienced stress urinary incontinence (SUI). At the last follow-up visit, one patient from group I presented with persistent SUI. CONCLUSIONS: For managing recurrent and nonrecurrent cases of BPH, top-down HoLEP is safe with comparable urinary functional outcomes. Patients with a history of previous prostate surgery can be counselled that their prior transurethral procedure does not reduce the benefits of HoLEP. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9553753 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95537532022-10-13 Outcomes of Top-Down Holmium Laser Enucleation of Prostate for Recurrent/Residual Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: One-Year Follow-Up Zakaria, Ahmed S. Hodhod, Amr Abbas, Loay Fathy, Moustafa Abdul Hadi, Ruba Shabana, Waleed MacDonald, Anastasia Alexandra Gamaleldin, Ahmed Abdallah, Mohamed Elgharbawy, Mohamed Ahmad, Abdulrahman Roos, Adam Kotb, Ahmed Shahrour, Walid Elmansy, Hazem Adv Urol Research Article MATERIALS AND METHODS: We carried out a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent top-down HoLEP for the management of recurrent BPH at our institution. Patients who had previously undergone TURP were assigned to group I, while those with no history of prostate surgery were allocated to group II. Preoperative clinical characteristics, enucleation time, resected tissue weight, morcellation time, energy used, and intraoperative and postoperative complications were recorded and statistically analyzed. Patients were followed up postoperatively at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. The evaluation included the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), quality of life assessment (QoL), maximum urinary flow rate (Q(max)), postvoid residual urine test (PVR), and continence status. RESULTS: Two hundred and sixty-nine patients were included in this study. Group I consisted of 68 patients with recurrent BPH, while group II included 201 patients. There were no statistically significant differences in preoperative characteristics between both groups. The median enucleation time for group I (67.5 min (25–200)) was not significantly longer than that for group II (60 min (19–165) (p=0.25)). Operative outcomes, including morcellation time, resected weight, catheter duration, and hospital stay, were comparable between both groups. At 1, 3, 6, and 12 months, all urinary functional outcomes showed significant improvement, and there were no significant differences between the two groups. At 3 months' follow-up, two patients in group I and three patients in group II experienced stress urinary incontinence (SUI). At the last follow-up visit, one patient from group I presented with persistent SUI. CONCLUSIONS: For managing recurrent and nonrecurrent cases of BPH, top-down HoLEP is safe with comparable urinary functional outcomes. Patients with a history of previous prostate surgery can be counselled that their prior transurethral procedure does not reduce the benefits of HoLEP. Hindawi 2022-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9553753/ /pubmed/36247205 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/5185114 Text en Copyright © 2022 Ahmed S. Zakaria et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Zakaria, Ahmed S. Hodhod, Amr Abbas, Loay Fathy, Moustafa Abdul Hadi, Ruba Shabana, Waleed MacDonald, Anastasia Alexandra Gamaleldin, Ahmed Abdallah, Mohamed Elgharbawy, Mohamed Ahmad, Abdulrahman Roos, Adam Kotb, Ahmed Shahrour, Walid Elmansy, Hazem Outcomes of Top-Down Holmium Laser Enucleation of Prostate for Recurrent/Residual Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: One-Year Follow-Up |
title | Outcomes of Top-Down Holmium Laser Enucleation of Prostate for Recurrent/Residual Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: One-Year Follow-Up |
title_full | Outcomes of Top-Down Holmium Laser Enucleation of Prostate for Recurrent/Residual Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: One-Year Follow-Up |
title_fullStr | Outcomes of Top-Down Holmium Laser Enucleation of Prostate for Recurrent/Residual Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: One-Year Follow-Up |
title_full_unstemmed | Outcomes of Top-Down Holmium Laser Enucleation of Prostate for Recurrent/Residual Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: One-Year Follow-Up |
title_short | Outcomes of Top-Down Holmium Laser Enucleation of Prostate for Recurrent/Residual Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: One-Year Follow-Up |
title_sort | outcomes of top-down holmium laser enucleation of prostate for recurrent/residual benign prostatic hyperplasia: one-year follow-up |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9553753/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36247205 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/5185114 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zakariaahmeds outcomesoftopdownholmiumlaserenucleationofprostateforrecurrentresidualbenignprostatichyperplasiaoneyearfollowup AT hodhodamr outcomesoftopdownholmiumlaserenucleationofprostateforrecurrentresidualbenignprostatichyperplasiaoneyearfollowup AT abbasloay outcomesoftopdownholmiumlaserenucleationofprostateforrecurrentresidualbenignprostatichyperplasiaoneyearfollowup AT fathymoustafa outcomesoftopdownholmiumlaserenucleationofprostateforrecurrentresidualbenignprostatichyperplasiaoneyearfollowup AT abdulhadiruba outcomesoftopdownholmiumlaserenucleationofprostateforrecurrentresidualbenignprostatichyperplasiaoneyearfollowup AT shabanawaleed outcomesoftopdownholmiumlaserenucleationofprostateforrecurrentresidualbenignprostatichyperplasiaoneyearfollowup AT macdonaldanastasiaalexandra outcomesoftopdownholmiumlaserenucleationofprostateforrecurrentresidualbenignprostatichyperplasiaoneyearfollowup AT gamaleldinahmed outcomesoftopdownholmiumlaserenucleationofprostateforrecurrentresidualbenignprostatichyperplasiaoneyearfollowup AT abdallahmohamed outcomesoftopdownholmiumlaserenucleationofprostateforrecurrentresidualbenignprostatichyperplasiaoneyearfollowup AT elgharbawymohamed outcomesoftopdownholmiumlaserenucleationofprostateforrecurrentresidualbenignprostatichyperplasiaoneyearfollowup AT ahmadabdulrahman outcomesoftopdownholmiumlaserenucleationofprostateforrecurrentresidualbenignprostatichyperplasiaoneyearfollowup AT roosadam outcomesoftopdownholmiumlaserenucleationofprostateforrecurrentresidualbenignprostatichyperplasiaoneyearfollowup AT kotbahmed outcomesoftopdownholmiumlaserenucleationofprostateforrecurrentresidualbenignprostatichyperplasiaoneyearfollowup AT shahrourwalid outcomesoftopdownholmiumlaserenucleationofprostateforrecurrentresidualbenignprostatichyperplasiaoneyearfollowup AT elmansyhazem outcomesoftopdownholmiumlaserenucleationofprostateforrecurrentresidualbenignprostatichyperplasiaoneyearfollowup |