Cargando…

A mobile-optimized artificial intelligence system for gestational age and fetal malpresentation assessment

BACKGROUND: Fetal ultrasound is an important component of antenatal care, but shortage of adequately trained healthcare workers has limited its adoption in low-to-middle-income countries. This study investigated the use of artificial intelligence for fetal ultrasound in under-resourced settings. MET...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gomes, Ryan G., Vwalika, Bellington, Lee, Chace, Willis, Angelica, Sieniek, Marcin, Price, Joan T., Chen, Christina, Kasaro, Margaret P., Taylor, James A., Stringer, Elizabeth M., McKinney, Scott Mayer, Sindano, Ntazana, Dahl, George E., Goodnight, William, Gilmer, Justin, Chi, Benjamin H., Lau, Charles, Spitz, Terry, Saensuksopa, T., Liu, Kris, Tiyasirichokchai, Tiya, Wong, Jonny, Pilgrim, Rory, Uddin, Akib, Corrado, Greg, Peng, Lily, Chou, Katherine, Tse, Daniel, Stringer, Jeffrey S. A., Shetty, Shravya
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9553916/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36249461
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s43856-022-00194-5
_version_ 1784806582992764928
author Gomes, Ryan G.
Vwalika, Bellington
Lee, Chace
Willis, Angelica
Sieniek, Marcin
Price, Joan T.
Chen, Christina
Kasaro, Margaret P.
Taylor, James A.
Stringer, Elizabeth M.
McKinney, Scott Mayer
Sindano, Ntazana
Dahl, George E.
Goodnight, William
Gilmer, Justin
Chi, Benjamin H.
Lau, Charles
Spitz, Terry
Saensuksopa, T.
Liu, Kris
Tiyasirichokchai, Tiya
Wong, Jonny
Pilgrim, Rory
Uddin, Akib
Corrado, Greg
Peng, Lily
Chou, Katherine
Tse, Daniel
Stringer, Jeffrey S. A.
Shetty, Shravya
author_facet Gomes, Ryan G.
Vwalika, Bellington
Lee, Chace
Willis, Angelica
Sieniek, Marcin
Price, Joan T.
Chen, Christina
Kasaro, Margaret P.
Taylor, James A.
Stringer, Elizabeth M.
McKinney, Scott Mayer
Sindano, Ntazana
Dahl, George E.
Goodnight, William
Gilmer, Justin
Chi, Benjamin H.
Lau, Charles
Spitz, Terry
Saensuksopa, T.
Liu, Kris
Tiyasirichokchai, Tiya
Wong, Jonny
Pilgrim, Rory
Uddin, Akib
Corrado, Greg
Peng, Lily
Chou, Katherine
Tse, Daniel
Stringer, Jeffrey S. A.
Shetty, Shravya
author_sort Gomes, Ryan G.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Fetal ultrasound is an important component of antenatal care, but shortage of adequately trained healthcare workers has limited its adoption in low-to-middle-income countries. This study investigated the use of artificial intelligence for fetal ultrasound in under-resourced settings. METHODS: Blind sweep ultrasounds, consisting of six freehand ultrasound sweeps, were collected by sonographers in the USA and Zambia, and novice operators in Zambia. We developed artificial intelligence (AI) models that used blind sweeps to predict gestational age (GA) and fetal malpresentation. AI GA estimates and standard fetal biometry estimates were compared to a previously established ground truth, and evaluated for difference in absolute error. Fetal malpresentation (non-cephalic vs cephalic) was compared to sonographer assessment. On-device AI model run-times were benchmarked on Android mobile phones. RESULTS: Here we show that GA estimation accuracy of the AI model is non-inferior to standard fetal biometry estimates (error difference −1.4 ± 4.5 days, 95% CI −1.8, −0.9, n = 406). Non-inferiority is maintained when blind sweeps are acquired by novice operators performing only two of six sweep motion types. Fetal malpresentation AUC-ROC is 0.977 (95% CI, 0.949, 1.00, n = 613), sonographers and novices have similar AUC-ROC. Software run-times on mobile phones for both diagnostic models are less than 3 s after completion of a sweep. CONCLUSIONS: The gestational age model is non-inferior to the clinical standard and the fetal malpresentation model has high AUC-ROCs across operators and devices. Our AI models are able to run on-device, without internet connectivity, and provide feedback scores to assist in upleveling the capabilities of lightly trained ultrasound operators in low resource settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9553916
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95539162022-10-13 A mobile-optimized artificial intelligence system for gestational age and fetal malpresentation assessment Gomes, Ryan G. Vwalika, Bellington Lee, Chace Willis, Angelica Sieniek, Marcin Price, Joan T. Chen, Christina Kasaro, Margaret P. Taylor, James A. Stringer, Elizabeth M. McKinney, Scott Mayer Sindano, Ntazana Dahl, George E. Goodnight, William Gilmer, Justin Chi, Benjamin H. Lau, Charles Spitz, Terry Saensuksopa, T. Liu, Kris Tiyasirichokchai, Tiya Wong, Jonny Pilgrim, Rory Uddin, Akib Corrado, Greg Peng, Lily Chou, Katherine Tse, Daniel Stringer, Jeffrey S. A. Shetty, Shravya Commun Med (Lond) Article BACKGROUND: Fetal ultrasound is an important component of antenatal care, but shortage of adequately trained healthcare workers has limited its adoption in low-to-middle-income countries. This study investigated the use of artificial intelligence for fetal ultrasound in under-resourced settings. METHODS: Blind sweep ultrasounds, consisting of six freehand ultrasound sweeps, were collected by sonographers in the USA and Zambia, and novice operators in Zambia. We developed artificial intelligence (AI) models that used blind sweeps to predict gestational age (GA) and fetal malpresentation. AI GA estimates and standard fetal biometry estimates were compared to a previously established ground truth, and evaluated for difference in absolute error. Fetal malpresentation (non-cephalic vs cephalic) was compared to sonographer assessment. On-device AI model run-times were benchmarked on Android mobile phones. RESULTS: Here we show that GA estimation accuracy of the AI model is non-inferior to standard fetal biometry estimates (error difference −1.4 ± 4.5 days, 95% CI −1.8, −0.9, n = 406). Non-inferiority is maintained when blind sweeps are acquired by novice operators performing only two of six sweep motion types. Fetal malpresentation AUC-ROC is 0.977 (95% CI, 0.949, 1.00, n = 613), sonographers and novices have similar AUC-ROC. Software run-times on mobile phones for both diagnostic models are less than 3 s after completion of a sweep. CONCLUSIONS: The gestational age model is non-inferior to the clinical standard and the fetal malpresentation model has high AUC-ROCs across operators and devices. Our AI models are able to run on-device, without internet connectivity, and provide feedback scores to assist in upleveling the capabilities of lightly trained ultrasound operators in low resource settings. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-10-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9553916/ /pubmed/36249461 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s43856-022-00194-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Gomes, Ryan G.
Vwalika, Bellington
Lee, Chace
Willis, Angelica
Sieniek, Marcin
Price, Joan T.
Chen, Christina
Kasaro, Margaret P.
Taylor, James A.
Stringer, Elizabeth M.
McKinney, Scott Mayer
Sindano, Ntazana
Dahl, George E.
Goodnight, William
Gilmer, Justin
Chi, Benjamin H.
Lau, Charles
Spitz, Terry
Saensuksopa, T.
Liu, Kris
Tiyasirichokchai, Tiya
Wong, Jonny
Pilgrim, Rory
Uddin, Akib
Corrado, Greg
Peng, Lily
Chou, Katherine
Tse, Daniel
Stringer, Jeffrey S. A.
Shetty, Shravya
A mobile-optimized artificial intelligence system for gestational age and fetal malpresentation assessment
title A mobile-optimized artificial intelligence system for gestational age and fetal malpresentation assessment
title_full A mobile-optimized artificial intelligence system for gestational age and fetal malpresentation assessment
title_fullStr A mobile-optimized artificial intelligence system for gestational age and fetal malpresentation assessment
title_full_unstemmed A mobile-optimized artificial intelligence system for gestational age and fetal malpresentation assessment
title_short A mobile-optimized artificial intelligence system for gestational age and fetal malpresentation assessment
title_sort mobile-optimized artificial intelligence system for gestational age and fetal malpresentation assessment
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9553916/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36249461
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s43856-022-00194-5
work_keys_str_mv AT gomesryang amobileoptimizedartificialintelligencesystemforgestationalageandfetalmalpresentationassessment
AT vwalikabellington amobileoptimizedartificialintelligencesystemforgestationalageandfetalmalpresentationassessment
AT leechace amobileoptimizedartificialintelligencesystemforgestationalageandfetalmalpresentationassessment
AT willisangelica amobileoptimizedartificialintelligencesystemforgestationalageandfetalmalpresentationassessment
AT sieniekmarcin amobileoptimizedartificialintelligencesystemforgestationalageandfetalmalpresentationassessment
AT pricejoant amobileoptimizedartificialintelligencesystemforgestationalageandfetalmalpresentationassessment
AT chenchristina amobileoptimizedartificialintelligencesystemforgestationalageandfetalmalpresentationassessment
AT kasaromargaretp amobileoptimizedartificialintelligencesystemforgestationalageandfetalmalpresentationassessment
AT taylorjamesa amobileoptimizedartificialintelligencesystemforgestationalageandfetalmalpresentationassessment
AT stringerelizabethm amobileoptimizedartificialintelligencesystemforgestationalageandfetalmalpresentationassessment
AT mckinneyscottmayer amobileoptimizedartificialintelligencesystemforgestationalageandfetalmalpresentationassessment
AT sindanontazana amobileoptimizedartificialintelligencesystemforgestationalageandfetalmalpresentationassessment
AT dahlgeorgee amobileoptimizedartificialintelligencesystemforgestationalageandfetalmalpresentationassessment
AT goodnightwilliam amobileoptimizedartificialintelligencesystemforgestationalageandfetalmalpresentationassessment
AT gilmerjustin amobileoptimizedartificialintelligencesystemforgestationalageandfetalmalpresentationassessment
AT chibenjaminh amobileoptimizedartificialintelligencesystemforgestationalageandfetalmalpresentationassessment
AT laucharles amobileoptimizedartificialintelligencesystemforgestationalageandfetalmalpresentationassessment
AT spitzterry amobileoptimizedartificialintelligencesystemforgestationalageandfetalmalpresentationassessment
AT saensuksopat amobileoptimizedartificialintelligencesystemforgestationalageandfetalmalpresentationassessment
AT liukris amobileoptimizedartificialintelligencesystemforgestationalageandfetalmalpresentationassessment
AT tiyasirichokchaitiya amobileoptimizedartificialintelligencesystemforgestationalageandfetalmalpresentationassessment
AT wongjonny amobileoptimizedartificialintelligencesystemforgestationalageandfetalmalpresentationassessment
AT pilgrimrory amobileoptimizedartificialintelligencesystemforgestationalageandfetalmalpresentationassessment
AT uddinakib amobileoptimizedartificialintelligencesystemforgestationalageandfetalmalpresentationassessment
AT corradogreg amobileoptimizedartificialintelligencesystemforgestationalageandfetalmalpresentationassessment
AT penglily amobileoptimizedartificialintelligencesystemforgestationalageandfetalmalpresentationassessment
AT choukatherine amobileoptimizedartificialintelligencesystemforgestationalageandfetalmalpresentationassessment
AT tsedaniel amobileoptimizedartificialintelligencesystemforgestationalageandfetalmalpresentationassessment
AT stringerjeffreysa amobileoptimizedartificialintelligencesystemforgestationalageandfetalmalpresentationassessment
AT shettyshravya amobileoptimizedartificialintelligencesystemforgestationalageandfetalmalpresentationassessment
AT gomesryang mobileoptimizedartificialintelligencesystemforgestationalageandfetalmalpresentationassessment
AT vwalikabellington mobileoptimizedartificialintelligencesystemforgestationalageandfetalmalpresentationassessment
AT leechace mobileoptimizedartificialintelligencesystemforgestationalageandfetalmalpresentationassessment
AT willisangelica mobileoptimizedartificialintelligencesystemforgestationalageandfetalmalpresentationassessment
AT sieniekmarcin mobileoptimizedartificialintelligencesystemforgestationalageandfetalmalpresentationassessment
AT pricejoant mobileoptimizedartificialintelligencesystemforgestationalageandfetalmalpresentationassessment
AT chenchristina mobileoptimizedartificialintelligencesystemforgestationalageandfetalmalpresentationassessment
AT kasaromargaretp mobileoptimizedartificialintelligencesystemforgestationalageandfetalmalpresentationassessment
AT taylorjamesa mobileoptimizedartificialintelligencesystemforgestationalageandfetalmalpresentationassessment
AT stringerelizabethm mobileoptimizedartificialintelligencesystemforgestationalageandfetalmalpresentationassessment
AT mckinneyscottmayer mobileoptimizedartificialintelligencesystemforgestationalageandfetalmalpresentationassessment
AT sindanontazana mobileoptimizedartificialintelligencesystemforgestationalageandfetalmalpresentationassessment
AT dahlgeorgee mobileoptimizedartificialintelligencesystemforgestationalageandfetalmalpresentationassessment
AT goodnightwilliam mobileoptimizedartificialintelligencesystemforgestationalageandfetalmalpresentationassessment
AT gilmerjustin mobileoptimizedartificialintelligencesystemforgestationalageandfetalmalpresentationassessment
AT chibenjaminh mobileoptimizedartificialintelligencesystemforgestationalageandfetalmalpresentationassessment
AT laucharles mobileoptimizedartificialintelligencesystemforgestationalageandfetalmalpresentationassessment
AT spitzterry mobileoptimizedartificialintelligencesystemforgestationalageandfetalmalpresentationassessment
AT saensuksopat mobileoptimizedartificialintelligencesystemforgestationalageandfetalmalpresentationassessment
AT liukris mobileoptimizedartificialintelligencesystemforgestationalageandfetalmalpresentationassessment
AT tiyasirichokchaitiya mobileoptimizedartificialintelligencesystemforgestationalageandfetalmalpresentationassessment
AT wongjonny mobileoptimizedartificialintelligencesystemforgestationalageandfetalmalpresentationassessment
AT pilgrimrory mobileoptimizedartificialintelligencesystemforgestationalageandfetalmalpresentationassessment
AT uddinakib mobileoptimizedartificialintelligencesystemforgestationalageandfetalmalpresentationassessment
AT corradogreg mobileoptimizedartificialintelligencesystemforgestationalageandfetalmalpresentationassessment
AT penglily mobileoptimizedartificialintelligencesystemforgestationalageandfetalmalpresentationassessment
AT choukatherine mobileoptimizedartificialintelligencesystemforgestationalageandfetalmalpresentationassessment
AT tsedaniel mobileoptimizedartificialintelligencesystemforgestationalageandfetalmalpresentationassessment
AT stringerjeffreysa mobileoptimizedartificialintelligencesystemforgestationalageandfetalmalpresentationassessment
AT shettyshravya mobileoptimizedartificialintelligencesystemforgestationalageandfetalmalpresentationassessment