Cargando…

Endoscopic pyloromyotomy for the treatment of severe and refractory gastroparesis: a pilot, randomised, sham-controlled trial

OBJECTIVE: Endoscopic pyloromyotomy (G-POEM) is a minimally invasive treatment option with promising uncontrolled outcome results in patients with gastroparesis. DESIGN: In this prospective randomised trial, we compared G-POEM with a sham procedure in patients with severe gastroparesis. The primary...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Martinek, Jan, Hustak, Rastislav, Mares, Jan, Vackova, Zuzana, Spicak, Julius, Kieslichova, Eva, Buncova, Marie, Pohl, Daniel, Amin, Sunil, Tack, Jan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9554080/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35470243
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2022-326904
_version_ 1784806613770567680
author Martinek, Jan
Hustak, Rastislav
Mares, Jan
Vackova, Zuzana
Spicak, Julius
Kieslichova, Eva
Buncova, Marie
Pohl, Daniel
Amin, Sunil
Tack, Jan
author_facet Martinek, Jan
Hustak, Rastislav
Mares, Jan
Vackova, Zuzana
Spicak, Julius
Kieslichova, Eva
Buncova, Marie
Pohl, Daniel
Amin, Sunil
Tack, Jan
author_sort Martinek, Jan
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Endoscopic pyloromyotomy (G-POEM) is a minimally invasive treatment option with promising uncontrolled outcome results in patients with gastroparesis. DESIGN: In this prospective randomised trial, we compared G-POEM with a sham procedure in patients with severe gastroparesis. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with treatment success (defined as a decrease in the Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI) by at least 50%) at 6 months. Patients randomised to the sham group with persistent symptoms were offered cross-over G-POEM. RESULTS: The enrolment was stopped after the interim analysis by the Data and Safety Monitoring Board prior to reaching the planned sample of 86 patients. A total of 41 patients (17 diabetic, 13 postsurgical, 11 idiopathic; 46% male) were randomised (21 G-POEM, 20-sham). Treatment success rate was 71% (95% CI 50 to 86) after G-POEM versus 22% (8–47) after sham (p=0.005). Treatment success in patients with diabetic, postsurgical and idiopathic gastroparesis was 89% (95% CI 56 to 98), 50% (18–82) and 67% (30–90) after G-POEM; the corresponding rates in the sham group were 17% (3–57), 29% (7–67) and 20% (3–67). Median gastric retention at 4 hours decreased from 22% (95% CI 17 to 31) to 12% (5–22) after G-POEM and did not change after sham: 26% (18–39) versus 24% (11–35). Twelve patients crossed over to G-POEM with 9 of them (75%) achieving treatment success. CONCLUSION: In severe gastroparesis, G-POEM is superior to a sham procedure for improving both symptoms and gastric emptying 6 months after the procedure. These results are not entirely conclusive in patients with idiopathic and postsurgical aetiologies. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03356067; ClinicalTrials.gov.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9554080
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95540802022-10-13 Endoscopic pyloromyotomy for the treatment of severe and refractory gastroparesis: a pilot, randomised, sham-controlled trial Martinek, Jan Hustak, Rastislav Mares, Jan Vackova, Zuzana Spicak, Julius Kieslichova, Eva Buncova, Marie Pohl, Daniel Amin, Sunil Tack, Jan Gut Stomach OBJECTIVE: Endoscopic pyloromyotomy (G-POEM) is a minimally invasive treatment option with promising uncontrolled outcome results in patients with gastroparesis. DESIGN: In this prospective randomised trial, we compared G-POEM with a sham procedure in patients with severe gastroparesis. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with treatment success (defined as a decrease in the Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI) by at least 50%) at 6 months. Patients randomised to the sham group with persistent symptoms were offered cross-over G-POEM. RESULTS: The enrolment was stopped after the interim analysis by the Data and Safety Monitoring Board prior to reaching the planned sample of 86 patients. A total of 41 patients (17 diabetic, 13 postsurgical, 11 idiopathic; 46% male) were randomised (21 G-POEM, 20-sham). Treatment success rate was 71% (95% CI 50 to 86) after G-POEM versus 22% (8–47) after sham (p=0.005). Treatment success in patients with diabetic, postsurgical and idiopathic gastroparesis was 89% (95% CI 56 to 98), 50% (18–82) and 67% (30–90) after G-POEM; the corresponding rates in the sham group were 17% (3–57), 29% (7–67) and 20% (3–67). Median gastric retention at 4 hours decreased from 22% (95% CI 17 to 31) to 12% (5–22) after G-POEM and did not change after sham: 26% (18–39) versus 24% (11–35). Twelve patients crossed over to G-POEM with 9 of them (75%) achieving treatment success. CONCLUSION: In severe gastroparesis, G-POEM is superior to a sham procedure for improving both symptoms and gastric emptying 6 months after the procedure. These results are not entirely conclusive in patients with idiopathic and postsurgical aetiologies. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03356067; ClinicalTrials.gov. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-11 2022-04-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9554080/ /pubmed/35470243 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2022-326904 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Stomach
Martinek, Jan
Hustak, Rastislav
Mares, Jan
Vackova, Zuzana
Spicak, Julius
Kieslichova, Eva
Buncova, Marie
Pohl, Daniel
Amin, Sunil
Tack, Jan
Endoscopic pyloromyotomy for the treatment of severe and refractory gastroparesis: a pilot, randomised, sham-controlled trial
title Endoscopic pyloromyotomy for the treatment of severe and refractory gastroparesis: a pilot, randomised, sham-controlled trial
title_full Endoscopic pyloromyotomy for the treatment of severe and refractory gastroparesis: a pilot, randomised, sham-controlled trial
title_fullStr Endoscopic pyloromyotomy for the treatment of severe and refractory gastroparesis: a pilot, randomised, sham-controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Endoscopic pyloromyotomy for the treatment of severe and refractory gastroparesis: a pilot, randomised, sham-controlled trial
title_short Endoscopic pyloromyotomy for the treatment of severe and refractory gastroparesis: a pilot, randomised, sham-controlled trial
title_sort endoscopic pyloromyotomy for the treatment of severe and refractory gastroparesis: a pilot, randomised, sham-controlled trial
topic Stomach
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9554080/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35470243
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2022-326904
work_keys_str_mv AT martinekjan endoscopicpyloromyotomyforthetreatmentofsevereandrefractorygastroparesisapilotrandomisedshamcontrolledtrial
AT hustakrastislav endoscopicpyloromyotomyforthetreatmentofsevereandrefractorygastroparesisapilotrandomisedshamcontrolledtrial
AT maresjan endoscopicpyloromyotomyforthetreatmentofsevereandrefractorygastroparesisapilotrandomisedshamcontrolledtrial
AT vackovazuzana endoscopicpyloromyotomyforthetreatmentofsevereandrefractorygastroparesisapilotrandomisedshamcontrolledtrial
AT spicakjulius endoscopicpyloromyotomyforthetreatmentofsevereandrefractorygastroparesisapilotrandomisedshamcontrolledtrial
AT kieslichovaeva endoscopicpyloromyotomyforthetreatmentofsevereandrefractorygastroparesisapilotrandomisedshamcontrolledtrial
AT buncovamarie endoscopicpyloromyotomyforthetreatmentofsevereandrefractorygastroparesisapilotrandomisedshamcontrolledtrial
AT pohldaniel endoscopicpyloromyotomyforthetreatmentofsevereandrefractorygastroparesisapilotrandomisedshamcontrolledtrial
AT aminsunil endoscopicpyloromyotomyforthetreatmentofsevereandrefractorygastroparesisapilotrandomisedshamcontrolledtrial
AT tackjan endoscopicpyloromyotomyforthetreatmentofsevereandrefractorygastroparesisapilotrandomisedshamcontrolledtrial