Cargando…
Endoscopic pyloromyotomy for the treatment of severe and refractory gastroparesis: a pilot, randomised, sham-controlled trial
OBJECTIVE: Endoscopic pyloromyotomy (G-POEM) is a minimally invasive treatment option with promising uncontrolled outcome results in patients with gastroparesis. DESIGN: In this prospective randomised trial, we compared G-POEM with a sham procedure in patients with severe gastroparesis. The primary...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9554080/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35470243 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2022-326904 |
_version_ | 1784806613770567680 |
---|---|
author | Martinek, Jan Hustak, Rastislav Mares, Jan Vackova, Zuzana Spicak, Julius Kieslichova, Eva Buncova, Marie Pohl, Daniel Amin, Sunil Tack, Jan |
author_facet | Martinek, Jan Hustak, Rastislav Mares, Jan Vackova, Zuzana Spicak, Julius Kieslichova, Eva Buncova, Marie Pohl, Daniel Amin, Sunil Tack, Jan |
author_sort | Martinek, Jan |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Endoscopic pyloromyotomy (G-POEM) is a minimally invasive treatment option with promising uncontrolled outcome results in patients with gastroparesis. DESIGN: In this prospective randomised trial, we compared G-POEM with a sham procedure in patients with severe gastroparesis. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with treatment success (defined as a decrease in the Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI) by at least 50%) at 6 months. Patients randomised to the sham group with persistent symptoms were offered cross-over G-POEM. RESULTS: The enrolment was stopped after the interim analysis by the Data and Safety Monitoring Board prior to reaching the planned sample of 86 patients. A total of 41 patients (17 diabetic, 13 postsurgical, 11 idiopathic; 46% male) were randomised (21 G-POEM, 20-sham). Treatment success rate was 71% (95% CI 50 to 86) after G-POEM versus 22% (8–47) after sham (p=0.005). Treatment success in patients with diabetic, postsurgical and idiopathic gastroparesis was 89% (95% CI 56 to 98), 50% (18–82) and 67% (30–90) after G-POEM; the corresponding rates in the sham group were 17% (3–57), 29% (7–67) and 20% (3–67). Median gastric retention at 4 hours decreased from 22% (95% CI 17 to 31) to 12% (5–22) after G-POEM and did not change after sham: 26% (18–39) versus 24% (11–35). Twelve patients crossed over to G-POEM with 9 of them (75%) achieving treatment success. CONCLUSION: In severe gastroparesis, G-POEM is superior to a sham procedure for improving both symptoms and gastric emptying 6 months after the procedure. These results are not entirely conclusive in patients with idiopathic and postsurgical aetiologies. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03356067; ClinicalTrials.gov. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9554080 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95540802022-10-13 Endoscopic pyloromyotomy for the treatment of severe and refractory gastroparesis: a pilot, randomised, sham-controlled trial Martinek, Jan Hustak, Rastislav Mares, Jan Vackova, Zuzana Spicak, Julius Kieslichova, Eva Buncova, Marie Pohl, Daniel Amin, Sunil Tack, Jan Gut Stomach OBJECTIVE: Endoscopic pyloromyotomy (G-POEM) is a minimally invasive treatment option with promising uncontrolled outcome results in patients with gastroparesis. DESIGN: In this prospective randomised trial, we compared G-POEM with a sham procedure in patients with severe gastroparesis. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with treatment success (defined as a decrease in the Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI) by at least 50%) at 6 months. Patients randomised to the sham group with persistent symptoms were offered cross-over G-POEM. RESULTS: The enrolment was stopped after the interim analysis by the Data and Safety Monitoring Board prior to reaching the planned sample of 86 patients. A total of 41 patients (17 diabetic, 13 postsurgical, 11 idiopathic; 46% male) were randomised (21 G-POEM, 20-sham). Treatment success rate was 71% (95% CI 50 to 86) after G-POEM versus 22% (8–47) after sham (p=0.005). Treatment success in patients with diabetic, postsurgical and idiopathic gastroparesis was 89% (95% CI 56 to 98), 50% (18–82) and 67% (30–90) after G-POEM; the corresponding rates in the sham group were 17% (3–57), 29% (7–67) and 20% (3–67). Median gastric retention at 4 hours decreased from 22% (95% CI 17 to 31) to 12% (5–22) after G-POEM and did not change after sham: 26% (18–39) versus 24% (11–35). Twelve patients crossed over to G-POEM with 9 of them (75%) achieving treatment success. CONCLUSION: In severe gastroparesis, G-POEM is superior to a sham procedure for improving both symptoms and gastric emptying 6 months after the procedure. These results are not entirely conclusive in patients with idiopathic and postsurgical aetiologies. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03356067; ClinicalTrials.gov. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-11 2022-04-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9554080/ /pubmed/35470243 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2022-326904 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Stomach Martinek, Jan Hustak, Rastislav Mares, Jan Vackova, Zuzana Spicak, Julius Kieslichova, Eva Buncova, Marie Pohl, Daniel Amin, Sunil Tack, Jan Endoscopic pyloromyotomy for the treatment of severe and refractory gastroparesis: a pilot, randomised, sham-controlled trial |
title | Endoscopic pyloromyotomy for the treatment of severe and refractory gastroparesis: a pilot, randomised, sham-controlled trial |
title_full | Endoscopic pyloromyotomy for the treatment of severe and refractory gastroparesis: a pilot, randomised, sham-controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Endoscopic pyloromyotomy for the treatment of severe and refractory gastroparesis: a pilot, randomised, sham-controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Endoscopic pyloromyotomy for the treatment of severe and refractory gastroparesis: a pilot, randomised, sham-controlled trial |
title_short | Endoscopic pyloromyotomy for the treatment of severe and refractory gastroparesis: a pilot, randomised, sham-controlled trial |
title_sort | endoscopic pyloromyotomy for the treatment of severe and refractory gastroparesis: a pilot, randomised, sham-controlled trial |
topic | Stomach |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9554080/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35470243 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2022-326904 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT martinekjan endoscopicpyloromyotomyforthetreatmentofsevereandrefractorygastroparesisapilotrandomisedshamcontrolledtrial AT hustakrastislav endoscopicpyloromyotomyforthetreatmentofsevereandrefractorygastroparesisapilotrandomisedshamcontrolledtrial AT maresjan endoscopicpyloromyotomyforthetreatmentofsevereandrefractorygastroparesisapilotrandomisedshamcontrolledtrial AT vackovazuzana endoscopicpyloromyotomyforthetreatmentofsevereandrefractorygastroparesisapilotrandomisedshamcontrolledtrial AT spicakjulius endoscopicpyloromyotomyforthetreatmentofsevereandrefractorygastroparesisapilotrandomisedshamcontrolledtrial AT kieslichovaeva endoscopicpyloromyotomyforthetreatmentofsevereandrefractorygastroparesisapilotrandomisedshamcontrolledtrial AT buncovamarie endoscopicpyloromyotomyforthetreatmentofsevereandrefractorygastroparesisapilotrandomisedshamcontrolledtrial AT pohldaniel endoscopicpyloromyotomyforthetreatmentofsevereandrefractorygastroparesisapilotrandomisedshamcontrolledtrial AT aminsunil endoscopicpyloromyotomyforthetreatmentofsevereandrefractorygastroparesisapilotrandomisedshamcontrolledtrial AT tackjan endoscopicpyloromyotomyforthetreatmentofsevereandrefractorygastroparesisapilotrandomisedshamcontrolledtrial |