Cargando…

A review of artificial intelligence in prostate cancer detection on imaging

A multitude of studies have explored the role of artificial intelligence (AI) in providing diagnostic support to radiologists, pathologists, and urologists in prostate cancer detection, risk-stratification, and management. This review provides a comprehensive overview of relevant literature regardin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bhattacharya, Indrani, Khandwala, Yash S., Vesal, Sulaiman, Shao, Wei, Yang, Qianye, Soerensen, Simon J.C., Fan, Richard E., Ghanouni, Pejman, Kunder, Christian A., Brooks, James D., Hu, Yipeng, Rusu, Mirabela, Sonn, Geoffrey A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9554123/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36249889
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17562872221128791
_version_ 1784806623212994560
author Bhattacharya, Indrani
Khandwala, Yash S.
Vesal, Sulaiman
Shao, Wei
Yang, Qianye
Soerensen, Simon J.C.
Fan, Richard E.
Ghanouni, Pejman
Kunder, Christian A.
Brooks, James D.
Hu, Yipeng
Rusu, Mirabela
Sonn, Geoffrey A.
author_facet Bhattacharya, Indrani
Khandwala, Yash S.
Vesal, Sulaiman
Shao, Wei
Yang, Qianye
Soerensen, Simon J.C.
Fan, Richard E.
Ghanouni, Pejman
Kunder, Christian A.
Brooks, James D.
Hu, Yipeng
Rusu, Mirabela
Sonn, Geoffrey A.
author_sort Bhattacharya, Indrani
collection PubMed
description A multitude of studies have explored the role of artificial intelligence (AI) in providing diagnostic support to radiologists, pathologists, and urologists in prostate cancer detection, risk-stratification, and management. This review provides a comprehensive overview of relevant literature regarding the use of AI models in (1) detecting prostate cancer on radiology images (magnetic resonance and ultrasound imaging), (2) detecting prostate cancer on histopathology images of prostate biopsy tissue, and (3) assisting in supporting tasks for prostate cancer detection (prostate gland segmentation, MRI-histopathology registration, MRI-ultrasound registration). We discuss both the potential of these AI models to assist in the clinical workflow of prostate cancer diagnosis, as well as the current limitations including variability in training data sets, algorithms, and evaluation criteria. We also discuss ongoing challenges and what is needed to bridge the gap between academic research on AI for prostate cancer and commercial solutions that improve routine clinical care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9554123
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95541232022-10-13 A review of artificial intelligence in prostate cancer detection on imaging Bhattacharya, Indrani Khandwala, Yash S. Vesal, Sulaiman Shao, Wei Yang, Qianye Soerensen, Simon J.C. Fan, Richard E. Ghanouni, Pejman Kunder, Christian A. Brooks, James D. Hu, Yipeng Rusu, Mirabela Sonn, Geoffrey A. Ther Adv Urol Current Best Practice for Prostate Biopsy: What is the evidence? A multitude of studies have explored the role of artificial intelligence (AI) in providing diagnostic support to radiologists, pathologists, and urologists in prostate cancer detection, risk-stratification, and management. This review provides a comprehensive overview of relevant literature regarding the use of AI models in (1) detecting prostate cancer on radiology images (magnetic resonance and ultrasound imaging), (2) detecting prostate cancer on histopathology images of prostate biopsy tissue, and (3) assisting in supporting tasks for prostate cancer detection (prostate gland segmentation, MRI-histopathology registration, MRI-ultrasound registration). We discuss both the potential of these AI models to assist in the clinical workflow of prostate cancer diagnosis, as well as the current limitations including variability in training data sets, algorithms, and evaluation criteria. We also discuss ongoing challenges and what is needed to bridge the gap between academic research on AI for prostate cancer and commercial solutions that improve routine clinical care. SAGE Publications 2022-10-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9554123/ /pubmed/36249889 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17562872221128791 Text en © The Author(s), 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Current Best Practice for Prostate Biopsy: What is the evidence?
Bhattacharya, Indrani
Khandwala, Yash S.
Vesal, Sulaiman
Shao, Wei
Yang, Qianye
Soerensen, Simon J.C.
Fan, Richard E.
Ghanouni, Pejman
Kunder, Christian A.
Brooks, James D.
Hu, Yipeng
Rusu, Mirabela
Sonn, Geoffrey A.
A review of artificial intelligence in prostate cancer detection on imaging
title A review of artificial intelligence in prostate cancer detection on imaging
title_full A review of artificial intelligence in prostate cancer detection on imaging
title_fullStr A review of artificial intelligence in prostate cancer detection on imaging
title_full_unstemmed A review of artificial intelligence in prostate cancer detection on imaging
title_short A review of artificial intelligence in prostate cancer detection on imaging
title_sort review of artificial intelligence in prostate cancer detection on imaging
topic Current Best Practice for Prostate Biopsy: What is the evidence?
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9554123/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36249889
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17562872221128791
work_keys_str_mv AT bhattacharyaindrani areviewofartificialintelligenceinprostatecancerdetectiononimaging
AT khandwalayashs areviewofartificialintelligenceinprostatecancerdetectiononimaging
AT vesalsulaiman areviewofartificialintelligenceinprostatecancerdetectiononimaging
AT shaowei areviewofartificialintelligenceinprostatecancerdetectiononimaging
AT yangqianye areviewofartificialintelligenceinprostatecancerdetectiononimaging
AT soerensensimonjc areviewofartificialintelligenceinprostatecancerdetectiononimaging
AT fanricharde areviewofartificialintelligenceinprostatecancerdetectiononimaging
AT ghanounipejman areviewofartificialintelligenceinprostatecancerdetectiononimaging
AT kunderchristiana areviewofartificialintelligenceinprostatecancerdetectiononimaging
AT brooksjamesd areviewofartificialintelligenceinprostatecancerdetectiononimaging
AT huyipeng areviewofartificialintelligenceinprostatecancerdetectiononimaging
AT rusumirabela areviewofartificialintelligenceinprostatecancerdetectiononimaging
AT sonngeoffreya areviewofartificialintelligenceinprostatecancerdetectiononimaging
AT bhattacharyaindrani reviewofartificialintelligenceinprostatecancerdetectiononimaging
AT khandwalayashs reviewofartificialintelligenceinprostatecancerdetectiononimaging
AT vesalsulaiman reviewofartificialintelligenceinprostatecancerdetectiononimaging
AT shaowei reviewofartificialintelligenceinprostatecancerdetectiononimaging
AT yangqianye reviewofartificialintelligenceinprostatecancerdetectiononimaging
AT soerensensimonjc reviewofartificialintelligenceinprostatecancerdetectiononimaging
AT fanricharde reviewofartificialintelligenceinprostatecancerdetectiononimaging
AT ghanounipejman reviewofartificialintelligenceinprostatecancerdetectiononimaging
AT kunderchristiana reviewofartificialintelligenceinprostatecancerdetectiononimaging
AT brooksjamesd reviewofartificialintelligenceinprostatecancerdetectiononimaging
AT huyipeng reviewofartificialintelligenceinprostatecancerdetectiononimaging
AT rusumirabela reviewofartificialintelligenceinprostatecancerdetectiononimaging
AT sonngeoffreya reviewofartificialintelligenceinprostatecancerdetectiononimaging