Cargando…

A comparison of iStent combined with phacoemulsification and endocyclophotocoagulation (ICE2) with the PreserFlo MicroShunt and XEN-45 implants

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS), including minimally invasive bleb surgery (MIBS), is a rapidly evolving area of research and clinical interest in ophthalmology. The growing number of devices has necessitated evaluations to identify subtle differences in outcomes between treat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Qidwai, Umair, Jones, Lee, Ratnarajan, Gokulan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9554128/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36246954
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/25158414221125697
_version_ 1784806624414662656
author Qidwai, Umair
Jones, Lee
Ratnarajan, Gokulan
author_facet Qidwai, Umair
Jones, Lee
Ratnarajan, Gokulan
author_sort Qidwai, Umair
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS), including minimally invasive bleb surgery (MIBS), is a rapidly evolving area of research and clinical interest in ophthalmology. The growing number of devices has necessitated evaluations to identify subtle differences in outcomes between treatments. OBJECTIVES: To compare clinical effectiveness and safety outcomes of iStent combined with endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation (ICE2) with bleb forming PreserFlo MicroShunt (PMS) and XEN-45 gel implant in a 24-month retrospective review. DESIGN: A retrospective review of patient records. METHODS: We compared outcomes of 247 patients undergoing one of three glaucoma procedures (ICE2 = 162; PMS = 48; XEN-45 = 37) at a single facility in the United Kingdom. Clinical records were reviewed retrospectively between July 2016 and May 2020. Pairwise comparisons and within group analyses were performed to assess intraocular pressure (IOP), best-corrected LogMAR visual acuity (BCVA), the Humphrey visual fields and antiglaucoma medication outcomes across the three treatment groups. RESULTS: No statistically significantly differences in IOP between the groups at day 7, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months. PMS had statistically significantly change in IOP between baseline and day 7 compared with ICE2 (p = 0.003). BCVA was statistically significant different at 24 months between the ICE2 compared with PMS group (0.12 versus 0.33 LogMAR; p = 0.002). PMS group achieved the largest decline in medication usage between baseline a 24-month follow-up (2.9 versus 0.9; p < 0.001), with no statistically significant difference in the number of antiglaucoma medications being used between groups at 24 months. Postoperative complications in all three groups were transient and could be resolved with office-based interventions. CONCLUSION: Real-world outcomes after 24 months were similar between patients undergoing MIGS and MIBS procedures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9554128
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95541282022-10-13 A comparison of iStent combined with phacoemulsification and endocyclophotocoagulation (ICE2) with the PreserFlo MicroShunt and XEN-45 implants Qidwai, Umair Jones, Lee Ratnarajan, Gokulan Ther Adv Ophthalmol Original Research BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS), including minimally invasive bleb surgery (MIBS), is a rapidly evolving area of research and clinical interest in ophthalmology. The growing number of devices has necessitated evaluations to identify subtle differences in outcomes between treatments. OBJECTIVES: To compare clinical effectiveness and safety outcomes of iStent combined with endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation (ICE2) with bleb forming PreserFlo MicroShunt (PMS) and XEN-45 gel implant in a 24-month retrospective review. DESIGN: A retrospective review of patient records. METHODS: We compared outcomes of 247 patients undergoing one of three glaucoma procedures (ICE2 = 162; PMS = 48; XEN-45 = 37) at a single facility in the United Kingdom. Clinical records were reviewed retrospectively between July 2016 and May 2020. Pairwise comparisons and within group analyses were performed to assess intraocular pressure (IOP), best-corrected LogMAR visual acuity (BCVA), the Humphrey visual fields and antiglaucoma medication outcomes across the three treatment groups. RESULTS: No statistically significantly differences in IOP between the groups at day 7, 6 months, 12 months and 24 months. PMS had statistically significantly change in IOP between baseline and day 7 compared with ICE2 (p = 0.003). BCVA was statistically significant different at 24 months between the ICE2 compared with PMS group (0.12 versus 0.33 LogMAR; p = 0.002). PMS group achieved the largest decline in medication usage between baseline a 24-month follow-up (2.9 versus 0.9; p < 0.001), with no statistically significant difference in the number of antiglaucoma medications being used between groups at 24 months. Postoperative complications in all three groups were transient and could be resolved with office-based interventions. CONCLUSION: Real-world outcomes after 24 months were similar between patients undergoing MIGS and MIBS procedures. SAGE Publications 2022-10-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9554128/ /pubmed/36246954 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/25158414221125697 Text en © The Author(s), 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page(https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research
Qidwai, Umair
Jones, Lee
Ratnarajan, Gokulan
A comparison of iStent combined with phacoemulsification and endocyclophotocoagulation (ICE2) with the PreserFlo MicroShunt and XEN-45 implants
title A comparison of iStent combined with phacoemulsification and endocyclophotocoagulation (ICE2) with the PreserFlo MicroShunt and XEN-45 implants
title_full A comparison of iStent combined with phacoemulsification and endocyclophotocoagulation (ICE2) with the PreserFlo MicroShunt and XEN-45 implants
title_fullStr A comparison of iStent combined with phacoemulsification and endocyclophotocoagulation (ICE2) with the PreserFlo MicroShunt and XEN-45 implants
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of iStent combined with phacoemulsification and endocyclophotocoagulation (ICE2) with the PreserFlo MicroShunt and XEN-45 implants
title_short A comparison of iStent combined with phacoemulsification and endocyclophotocoagulation (ICE2) with the PreserFlo MicroShunt and XEN-45 implants
title_sort comparison of istent combined with phacoemulsification and endocyclophotocoagulation (ice2) with the preserflo microshunt and xen-45 implants
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9554128/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36246954
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/25158414221125697
work_keys_str_mv AT qidwaiumair acomparisonofistentcombinedwithphacoemulsificationandendocyclophotocoagulationice2withthepreserflomicroshuntandxen45implants
AT joneslee acomparisonofistentcombinedwithphacoemulsificationandendocyclophotocoagulationice2withthepreserflomicroshuntandxen45implants
AT ratnarajangokulan acomparisonofistentcombinedwithphacoemulsificationandendocyclophotocoagulationice2withthepreserflomicroshuntandxen45implants
AT qidwaiumair comparisonofistentcombinedwithphacoemulsificationandendocyclophotocoagulationice2withthepreserflomicroshuntandxen45implants
AT joneslee comparisonofistentcombinedwithphacoemulsificationandendocyclophotocoagulationice2withthepreserflomicroshuntandxen45implants
AT ratnarajangokulan comparisonofistentcombinedwithphacoemulsificationandendocyclophotocoagulationice2withthepreserflomicroshuntandxen45implants