Cargando…

High visceral adipose tissue area is independently associated with early allograft dysfunction in liver transplantation recipients: a propensity score analysis

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the association between adipose tissue distribution and early allograft dysfunction (EAD) in liver transplantation (LT) recipients. METHODS: A total of 175 patients who received LT from April 2015 to September 2020 were enrolled in this retrospective study. The areas of abdom...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yuan, Guanjie, Li, Shichao, Liang, Ping, Chen, Gen, Luo, Yan, Shen, Yaqi, Hu, Xuemei, Hu, Daoyu, Li, Jiali, Li, Zhen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Vienna 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9554174/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36219263
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13244-022-01302-8
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the association between adipose tissue distribution and early allograft dysfunction (EAD) in liver transplantation (LT) recipients. METHODS: A total of 175 patients who received LT from April 2015 to September 2020 were enrolled in this retrospective study. The areas of abdominal adipose tissue and skeletal muscle of all patients were measured based on the preoperative CT images. The appropriate statistical methods including the propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis were performed to identify the association between adipose tissue distribution and EAD. RESULTS: Of 175 LT recipients, 55 patients (31.4%) finally developed EAD. The multivariate logistic analysis revealed that preoperative serum albumin (odds ratio (OR) 0.34, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.17–0.70), platelet–lymphocyte ratio (OR 2.35, 95% CI 1.18–4.79), and visceral adipose tissue (VAT) area (OR 3.17, 95% CI 1.56–6.43) were independent associated with EAD. After PSM analysis, VAT area was still significantly associated with EAD (OR 3.95, 95% CI 1.16–13.51). In survival analysis, no significant difference was identified in one-year graft failure (log-rank: p = 0.487), and conversely result was identified in overall survival (OS) (log-rank: p = 0.012; hazard ratio (HR) 4.10, 95% CI 1.27–13.16). CONCLUSIONS: LT recipients with high VAT area have higher risk for the occurrence of EAD, and high VAT area might have certain clinical value for predicting the poor OS of patients. For LT candidates with large amount of VAT, the clinicians can take clinical interventions by suggesting physical and nutritional treatments to improve outcomes after LT.