Cargando…

Potential tolerability of ancient grains in non-celiac wheat sensitivity patients: A preliminary evaluation

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: A wheat-free diet (WFD) represents the elective treatment for Non-celiac Wheat Sensitivity (NCWS) patients. Preliminary reports have shown a possible better tolerability of ancient grains in these subjects. The aim of this observational study was to evaluate the frequency of con...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Seidita, Aurelio, Mansueto, Pasquale, Giuliano, Alessandra, Chiavetta, Marta, Mandreucci, Francesca, Soresi, Maurizio, Pistone, Mattia, Compagnoni, Stella, Castellucci, Daniele, Bisso, Gianluca, Faraci, Francesco, Maestri, Salvatore, Disclafani, Rosaria, Sapone, Anna, Fasano, Alessio, Carroccio, Antonio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9554215/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36250065
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.995019
_version_ 1784806642197463040
author Seidita, Aurelio
Mansueto, Pasquale
Giuliano, Alessandra
Chiavetta, Marta
Mandreucci, Francesca
Soresi, Maurizio
Pistone, Mattia
Compagnoni, Stella
Castellucci, Daniele
Bisso, Gianluca
Faraci, Francesco
Maestri, Salvatore
Disclafani, Rosaria
Sapone, Anna
Fasano, Alessio
Carroccio, Antonio
author_facet Seidita, Aurelio
Mansueto, Pasquale
Giuliano, Alessandra
Chiavetta, Marta
Mandreucci, Francesca
Soresi, Maurizio
Pistone, Mattia
Compagnoni, Stella
Castellucci, Daniele
Bisso, Gianluca
Faraci, Francesco
Maestri, Salvatore
Disclafani, Rosaria
Sapone, Anna
Fasano, Alessio
Carroccio, Antonio
author_sort Seidita, Aurelio
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: A wheat-free diet (WFD) represents the elective treatment for Non-celiac Wheat Sensitivity (NCWS) patients. Preliminary reports have shown a possible better tolerability of ancient grains in these subjects. The aim of this observational study was to evaluate the frequency of consumption of ancient grains and its correlation with clinical manifestations in NCWS patients. METHODS: 223 NCWS patients were recruited, and their consumption of ancient grains was monitored. Participants were first administered a modified version of the Pavia/Biagi questionnaire to investigate their adherence to “modern WFD.” The appearance/exacerbation of symptoms after ingestion of ancient grains was then assessed with WHO toxicity grading scale. RESULTS: 50.2% of the recruited patients reported consuming ancient grains before NCWS diagnosis; the diagnostic delay in this group was significantly higher than in non-consumers [median (range) 72 (6–612) vs. 60 months (3–684), P = 0.03] and these patients reported lower frequency of constipation (P = 0.04). Of the 107 patients with optimal adherence to modern WFD, 14 reported eating ancient wheat after NCWS diagnosis. Among them, 5 reported milder symptoms than those caused by modern wheat intake and 3 had an excellent tolerability without symptoms. Timilia/Tumminia variety was the most frequently used ancient grain. CONCLUSIONS: NCWS patients who consume ancient grains may receive a late diagnosis due to the possible clinical benefit (tolerability) obtained with these grains. Even after diagnosis, 10% of the patients still consumed ancient grains and had mild or no symptoms. Further studies are required to define the pathophysiological mechanism behind their putative greater tolerability.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9554215
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95542152022-10-13 Potential tolerability of ancient grains in non-celiac wheat sensitivity patients: A preliminary evaluation Seidita, Aurelio Mansueto, Pasquale Giuliano, Alessandra Chiavetta, Marta Mandreucci, Francesca Soresi, Maurizio Pistone, Mattia Compagnoni, Stella Castellucci, Daniele Bisso, Gianluca Faraci, Francesco Maestri, Salvatore Disclafani, Rosaria Sapone, Anna Fasano, Alessio Carroccio, Antonio Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine BACKGROUND AND AIMS: A wheat-free diet (WFD) represents the elective treatment for Non-celiac Wheat Sensitivity (NCWS) patients. Preliminary reports have shown a possible better tolerability of ancient grains in these subjects. The aim of this observational study was to evaluate the frequency of consumption of ancient grains and its correlation with clinical manifestations in NCWS patients. METHODS: 223 NCWS patients were recruited, and their consumption of ancient grains was monitored. Participants were first administered a modified version of the Pavia/Biagi questionnaire to investigate their adherence to “modern WFD.” The appearance/exacerbation of symptoms after ingestion of ancient grains was then assessed with WHO toxicity grading scale. RESULTS: 50.2% of the recruited patients reported consuming ancient grains before NCWS diagnosis; the diagnostic delay in this group was significantly higher than in non-consumers [median (range) 72 (6–612) vs. 60 months (3–684), P = 0.03] and these patients reported lower frequency of constipation (P = 0.04). Of the 107 patients with optimal adherence to modern WFD, 14 reported eating ancient wheat after NCWS diagnosis. Among them, 5 reported milder symptoms than those caused by modern wheat intake and 3 had an excellent tolerability without symptoms. Timilia/Tumminia variety was the most frequently used ancient grain. CONCLUSIONS: NCWS patients who consume ancient grains may receive a late diagnosis due to the possible clinical benefit (tolerability) obtained with these grains. Even after diagnosis, 10% of the patients still consumed ancient grains and had mild or no symptoms. Further studies are required to define the pathophysiological mechanism behind their putative greater tolerability. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9554215/ /pubmed/36250065 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.995019 Text en Copyright © 2022 Seidita, Mansueto, Giuliano, Chiavetta, Mandreucci, Soresi, Pistone, Compagnoni, Castellucci, Bisso, Faraci, Maestri, Disclafani, Sapone, Fasano and Carroccio. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Medicine
Seidita, Aurelio
Mansueto, Pasquale
Giuliano, Alessandra
Chiavetta, Marta
Mandreucci, Francesca
Soresi, Maurizio
Pistone, Mattia
Compagnoni, Stella
Castellucci, Daniele
Bisso, Gianluca
Faraci, Francesco
Maestri, Salvatore
Disclafani, Rosaria
Sapone, Anna
Fasano, Alessio
Carroccio, Antonio
Potential tolerability of ancient grains in non-celiac wheat sensitivity patients: A preliminary evaluation
title Potential tolerability of ancient grains in non-celiac wheat sensitivity patients: A preliminary evaluation
title_full Potential tolerability of ancient grains in non-celiac wheat sensitivity patients: A preliminary evaluation
title_fullStr Potential tolerability of ancient grains in non-celiac wheat sensitivity patients: A preliminary evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Potential tolerability of ancient grains in non-celiac wheat sensitivity patients: A preliminary evaluation
title_short Potential tolerability of ancient grains in non-celiac wheat sensitivity patients: A preliminary evaluation
title_sort potential tolerability of ancient grains in non-celiac wheat sensitivity patients: a preliminary evaluation
topic Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9554215/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36250065
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.995019
work_keys_str_mv AT seiditaaurelio potentialtolerabilityofancientgrainsinnonceliacwheatsensitivitypatientsapreliminaryevaluation
AT mansuetopasquale potentialtolerabilityofancientgrainsinnonceliacwheatsensitivitypatientsapreliminaryevaluation
AT giulianoalessandra potentialtolerabilityofancientgrainsinnonceliacwheatsensitivitypatientsapreliminaryevaluation
AT chiavettamarta potentialtolerabilityofancientgrainsinnonceliacwheatsensitivitypatientsapreliminaryevaluation
AT mandreuccifrancesca potentialtolerabilityofancientgrainsinnonceliacwheatsensitivitypatientsapreliminaryevaluation
AT soresimaurizio potentialtolerabilityofancientgrainsinnonceliacwheatsensitivitypatientsapreliminaryevaluation
AT pistonemattia potentialtolerabilityofancientgrainsinnonceliacwheatsensitivitypatientsapreliminaryevaluation
AT compagnonistella potentialtolerabilityofancientgrainsinnonceliacwheatsensitivitypatientsapreliminaryevaluation
AT castelluccidaniele potentialtolerabilityofancientgrainsinnonceliacwheatsensitivitypatientsapreliminaryevaluation
AT bissogianluca potentialtolerabilityofancientgrainsinnonceliacwheatsensitivitypatientsapreliminaryevaluation
AT faracifrancesco potentialtolerabilityofancientgrainsinnonceliacwheatsensitivitypatientsapreliminaryevaluation
AT maestrisalvatore potentialtolerabilityofancientgrainsinnonceliacwheatsensitivitypatientsapreliminaryevaluation
AT disclafanirosaria potentialtolerabilityofancientgrainsinnonceliacwheatsensitivitypatientsapreliminaryevaluation
AT saponeanna potentialtolerabilityofancientgrainsinnonceliacwheatsensitivitypatientsapreliminaryevaluation
AT fasanoalessio potentialtolerabilityofancientgrainsinnonceliacwheatsensitivitypatientsapreliminaryevaluation
AT carroccioantonio potentialtolerabilityofancientgrainsinnonceliacwheatsensitivitypatientsapreliminaryevaluation