Cargando…
Getting the Story Right: Reflecting on an Indigenous Rubric to Guide the Interpretation of Mortality Data
The Family Violence Death Review Committee (FVDRC) is one of five Mortality Review Committees (MRCs) that sit within the Health Quality & Safety Commission, Aotearoa, New Zealand. A key goal of the work of these committees is the reduction of the unequal burden of disparities shouldered by Māori...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9554367/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34490821 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/08862605211042565 |
_version_ | 1784806678489726976 |
---|---|
author | Cram, Fiona Cannell, Heidi Gulliver, Pauline |
author_facet | Cram, Fiona Cannell, Heidi Gulliver, Pauline |
author_sort | Cram, Fiona |
collection | PubMed |
description | The Family Violence Death Review Committee (FVDRC) is one of five Mortality Review Committees (MRCs) that sit within the Health Quality & Safety Commission, Aotearoa, New Zealand. A key goal of the work of these committees is the reduction of the unequal burden of disparities shouldered by Māori (Indigenous peoples). Guidance to the committees on interpreting and reporting Māori mortality comes from Te Pou (the pillar/post), a Māori responsiveness rubric published in 2019 by Ngā Pou Arawhenua (the caucus of Māori MRC members). This guidance was called upon by the FVDRC in the preparation of its sixth report, “Men who use violence,” published in 2020. In this article, the FVDRC reflects on how it strove to uphold responsibilities toward Te Titiriti o Waitangi() in its sixth report to get the story right (Tika—to be correct or true), be culturally and socially responsive (Manaakitanga—hospitability, kindness, support), advance equity, self-determination and social justice (Mana—prestige, authority, spiritual power), and establish relationship for positive change (Mahi Tahi—working together). Opportunities for improved responsiveness in FVDRC reporting are identified, alongside suggestions for extending the guidance in Te Pou. Reflective practice on responsiveness to Māori/Indigenous peoples is recommended more generally for MRCs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9554367 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95543672022-10-13 Getting the Story Right: Reflecting on an Indigenous Rubric to Guide the Interpretation of Mortality Data Cram, Fiona Cannell, Heidi Gulliver, Pauline J Interpers Violence Original Articles The Family Violence Death Review Committee (FVDRC) is one of five Mortality Review Committees (MRCs) that sit within the Health Quality & Safety Commission, Aotearoa, New Zealand. A key goal of the work of these committees is the reduction of the unequal burden of disparities shouldered by Māori (Indigenous peoples). Guidance to the committees on interpreting and reporting Māori mortality comes from Te Pou (the pillar/post), a Māori responsiveness rubric published in 2019 by Ngā Pou Arawhenua (the caucus of Māori MRC members). This guidance was called upon by the FVDRC in the preparation of its sixth report, “Men who use violence,” published in 2020. In this article, the FVDRC reflects on how it strove to uphold responsibilities toward Te Titiriti o Waitangi() in its sixth report to get the story right (Tika—to be correct or true), be culturally and socially responsive (Manaakitanga—hospitability, kindness, support), advance equity, self-determination and social justice (Mana—prestige, authority, spiritual power), and establish relationship for positive change (Mahi Tahi—working together). Opportunities for improved responsiveness in FVDRC reporting are identified, alongside suggestions for extending the guidance in Te Pou. Reflective practice on responsiveness to Māori/Indigenous peoples is recommended more generally for MRCs. SAGE Publications 2021-09-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9554367/ /pubmed/34490821 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/08862605211042565 Text en © 2021 SAGE Publications https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Cram, Fiona Cannell, Heidi Gulliver, Pauline Getting the Story Right: Reflecting on an Indigenous Rubric to Guide the Interpretation of Mortality Data |
title | Getting the Story Right: Reflecting on an Indigenous Rubric to Guide
the Interpretation of Mortality Data |
title_full | Getting the Story Right: Reflecting on an Indigenous Rubric to Guide
the Interpretation of Mortality Data |
title_fullStr | Getting the Story Right: Reflecting on an Indigenous Rubric to Guide
the Interpretation of Mortality Data |
title_full_unstemmed | Getting the Story Right: Reflecting on an Indigenous Rubric to Guide
the Interpretation of Mortality Data |
title_short | Getting the Story Right: Reflecting on an Indigenous Rubric to Guide
the Interpretation of Mortality Data |
title_sort | getting the story right: reflecting on an indigenous rubric to guide
the interpretation of mortality data |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9554367/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34490821 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/08862605211042565 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cramfiona gettingthestoryrightreflectingonanindigenousrubrictoguidetheinterpretationofmortalitydata AT cannellheidi gettingthestoryrightreflectingonanindigenousrubrictoguidetheinterpretationofmortalitydata AT gulliverpauline gettingthestoryrightreflectingonanindigenousrubrictoguidetheinterpretationofmortalitydata |