Cargando…

Getting the Story Right: Reflecting on an Indigenous Rubric to Guide the Interpretation of Mortality Data

The Family Violence Death Review Committee (FVDRC) is one of five Mortality Review Committees (MRCs) that sit within the Health Quality & Safety Commission, Aotearoa, New Zealand. A key goal of the work of these committees is the reduction of the unequal burden of disparities shouldered by Māori...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cram, Fiona, Cannell, Heidi, Gulliver, Pauline
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9554367/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34490821
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/08862605211042565
_version_ 1784806678489726976
author Cram, Fiona
Cannell, Heidi
Gulliver, Pauline
author_facet Cram, Fiona
Cannell, Heidi
Gulliver, Pauline
author_sort Cram, Fiona
collection PubMed
description The Family Violence Death Review Committee (FVDRC) is one of five Mortality Review Committees (MRCs) that sit within the Health Quality & Safety Commission, Aotearoa, New Zealand. A key goal of the work of these committees is the reduction of the unequal burden of disparities shouldered by Māori (Indigenous peoples). Guidance to the committees on interpreting and reporting Māori mortality comes from Te Pou (the pillar/post), a Māori responsiveness rubric published in 2019 by Ngā Pou Arawhenua (the caucus of Māori MRC members). This guidance was called upon by the FVDRC in the preparation of its sixth report, “Men who use violence,” published in 2020. In this article, the FVDRC reflects on how it strove to uphold responsibilities toward Te Titiriti o Waitangi() in its sixth report to get the story right (Tika—to be correct or true), be culturally and socially responsive (Manaakitanga—hospitability, kindness, support), advance equity, self-determination and social justice (Mana—prestige, authority, spiritual power), and establish relationship for positive change (Mahi Tahi—working together). Opportunities for improved responsiveness in FVDRC reporting are identified, alongside suggestions for extending the guidance in Te Pou. Reflective practice on responsiveness to Māori/Indigenous peoples is recommended more generally for MRCs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9554367
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95543672022-10-13 Getting the Story Right: Reflecting on an Indigenous Rubric to Guide the Interpretation of Mortality Data Cram, Fiona Cannell, Heidi Gulliver, Pauline J Interpers Violence Original Articles The Family Violence Death Review Committee (FVDRC) is one of five Mortality Review Committees (MRCs) that sit within the Health Quality & Safety Commission, Aotearoa, New Zealand. A key goal of the work of these committees is the reduction of the unequal burden of disparities shouldered by Māori (Indigenous peoples). Guidance to the committees on interpreting and reporting Māori mortality comes from Te Pou (the pillar/post), a Māori responsiveness rubric published in 2019 by Ngā Pou Arawhenua (the caucus of Māori MRC members). This guidance was called upon by the FVDRC in the preparation of its sixth report, “Men who use violence,” published in 2020. In this article, the FVDRC reflects on how it strove to uphold responsibilities toward Te Titiriti o Waitangi() in its sixth report to get the story right (Tika—to be correct or true), be culturally and socially responsive (Manaakitanga—hospitability, kindness, support), advance equity, self-determination and social justice (Mana—prestige, authority, spiritual power), and establish relationship for positive change (Mahi Tahi—working together). Opportunities for improved responsiveness in FVDRC reporting are identified, alongside suggestions for extending the guidance in Te Pou. Reflective practice on responsiveness to Māori/Indigenous peoples is recommended more generally for MRCs. SAGE Publications 2021-09-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9554367/ /pubmed/34490821 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/08862605211042565 Text en © 2021 SAGE Publications https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Articles
Cram, Fiona
Cannell, Heidi
Gulliver, Pauline
Getting the Story Right: Reflecting on an Indigenous Rubric to Guide the Interpretation of Mortality Data
title Getting the Story Right: Reflecting on an Indigenous Rubric to Guide the Interpretation of Mortality Data
title_full Getting the Story Right: Reflecting on an Indigenous Rubric to Guide the Interpretation of Mortality Data
title_fullStr Getting the Story Right: Reflecting on an Indigenous Rubric to Guide the Interpretation of Mortality Data
title_full_unstemmed Getting the Story Right: Reflecting on an Indigenous Rubric to Guide the Interpretation of Mortality Data
title_short Getting the Story Right: Reflecting on an Indigenous Rubric to Guide the Interpretation of Mortality Data
title_sort getting the story right: reflecting on an indigenous rubric to guide the interpretation of mortality data
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9554367/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34490821
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/08862605211042565
work_keys_str_mv AT cramfiona gettingthestoryrightreflectingonanindigenousrubrictoguidetheinterpretationofmortalitydata
AT cannellheidi gettingthestoryrightreflectingonanindigenousrubrictoguidetheinterpretationofmortalitydata
AT gulliverpauline gettingthestoryrightreflectingonanindigenousrubrictoguidetheinterpretationofmortalitydata