Cargando…

Safety evaluation of early drain removal following pancreaticoduodenectomy: A single-center retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVES: The effects of early drain removal (EDR) on postoperative complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) remains to be investigated. This single-center retrospective cohort study was designed to explore the safety of EDR after PD. METHODS: A total of 112 patients undergoing PD with dra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xie, Xuehai, Chen, Kai, Liu, Zonghao, Wang, Feng, Ma, Yongsu, Zhang, Shupeng, Shao, Zhijiang, Yang, Yinmo, Tian, Xiaodong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9554647/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36249020
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.993901
_version_ 1784806746185793536
author Xie, Xuehai
Chen, Kai
Liu, Zonghao
Wang, Feng
Ma, Yongsu
Zhang, Shupeng
Shao, Zhijiang
Yang, Yinmo
Tian, Xiaodong
author_facet Xie, Xuehai
Chen, Kai
Liu, Zonghao
Wang, Feng
Ma, Yongsu
Zhang, Shupeng
Shao, Zhijiang
Yang, Yinmo
Tian, Xiaodong
author_sort Xie, Xuehai
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The effects of early drain removal (EDR) on postoperative complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) remains to be investigated. This single-center retrospective cohort study was designed to explore the safety of EDR after PD. METHODS: A total of 112 patients undergoing PD with drain fluid amylase (DFA) on postoperative day (POD) 1 and 3 <= 5000 were divided into EDR and late drain removal (LDR). Propensity Score Matching (PSM) was used. We compared postoperative outcomes between two groups and explore the risk factors of total complications using univariate and multiple logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: No statistical differences were found in primary outcomes, including Grade B/C postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) (Original cohort: 5.71% vs. 3.90%; P = 1.000; PSM cohort: 3.33% vs. 6.67%; P = 1.000), and total complications (Original cohort: 17.14% vs. 32.47%; P = 0.093; PSM cohort: 13.33% vs. 33.33%; P = 0.067). The EDR was associated with shorter in-hospital stay (Original cohort: 11 days vs. 15 days; P < 0.0001; PSM cohort: 11 days vs. 15 days; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: EDR on POD 3 is safe for patients undergoing PD with low risk of POPF.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9554647
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95546472022-10-13 Safety evaluation of early drain removal following pancreaticoduodenectomy: A single-center retrospective cohort study Xie, Xuehai Chen, Kai Liu, Zonghao Wang, Feng Ma, Yongsu Zhang, Shupeng Shao, Zhijiang Yang, Yinmo Tian, Xiaodong Front Oncol Oncology OBJECTIVES: The effects of early drain removal (EDR) on postoperative complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) remains to be investigated. This single-center retrospective cohort study was designed to explore the safety of EDR after PD. METHODS: A total of 112 patients undergoing PD with drain fluid amylase (DFA) on postoperative day (POD) 1 and 3 <= 5000 were divided into EDR and late drain removal (LDR). Propensity Score Matching (PSM) was used. We compared postoperative outcomes between two groups and explore the risk factors of total complications using univariate and multiple logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: No statistical differences were found in primary outcomes, including Grade B/C postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) (Original cohort: 5.71% vs. 3.90%; P = 1.000; PSM cohort: 3.33% vs. 6.67%; P = 1.000), and total complications (Original cohort: 17.14% vs. 32.47%; P = 0.093; PSM cohort: 13.33% vs. 33.33%; P = 0.067). The EDR was associated with shorter in-hospital stay (Original cohort: 11 days vs. 15 days; P < 0.0001; PSM cohort: 11 days vs. 15 days; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: EDR on POD 3 is safe for patients undergoing PD with low risk of POPF. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9554647/ /pubmed/36249020 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.993901 Text en Copyright © 2022 Xie, Chen, Liu, Wang, Ma, Zhang, Shao, Yang and Tian https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Xie, Xuehai
Chen, Kai
Liu, Zonghao
Wang, Feng
Ma, Yongsu
Zhang, Shupeng
Shao, Zhijiang
Yang, Yinmo
Tian, Xiaodong
Safety evaluation of early drain removal following pancreaticoduodenectomy: A single-center retrospective cohort study
title Safety evaluation of early drain removal following pancreaticoduodenectomy: A single-center retrospective cohort study
title_full Safety evaluation of early drain removal following pancreaticoduodenectomy: A single-center retrospective cohort study
title_fullStr Safety evaluation of early drain removal following pancreaticoduodenectomy: A single-center retrospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Safety evaluation of early drain removal following pancreaticoduodenectomy: A single-center retrospective cohort study
title_short Safety evaluation of early drain removal following pancreaticoduodenectomy: A single-center retrospective cohort study
title_sort safety evaluation of early drain removal following pancreaticoduodenectomy: a single-center retrospective cohort study
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9554647/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36249020
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.993901
work_keys_str_mv AT xiexuehai safetyevaluationofearlydrainremovalfollowingpancreaticoduodenectomyasinglecenterretrospectivecohortstudy
AT chenkai safetyevaluationofearlydrainremovalfollowingpancreaticoduodenectomyasinglecenterretrospectivecohortstudy
AT liuzonghao safetyevaluationofearlydrainremovalfollowingpancreaticoduodenectomyasinglecenterretrospectivecohortstudy
AT wangfeng safetyevaluationofearlydrainremovalfollowingpancreaticoduodenectomyasinglecenterretrospectivecohortstudy
AT mayongsu safetyevaluationofearlydrainremovalfollowingpancreaticoduodenectomyasinglecenterretrospectivecohortstudy
AT zhangshupeng safetyevaluationofearlydrainremovalfollowingpancreaticoduodenectomyasinglecenterretrospectivecohortstudy
AT shaozhijiang safetyevaluationofearlydrainremovalfollowingpancreaticoduodenectomyasinglecenterretrospectivecohortstudy
AT yangyinmo safetyevaluationofearlydrainremovalfollowingpancreaticoduodenectomyasinglecenterretrospectivecohortstudy
AT tianxiaodong safetyevaluationofearlydrainremovalfollowingpancreaticoduodenectomyasinglecenterretrospectivecohortstudy