Cargando…
Safety evaluation of early drain removal following pancreaticoduodenectomy: A single-center retrospective cohort study
OBJECTIVES: The effects of early drain removal (EDR) on postoperative complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) remains to be investigated. This single-center retrospective cohort study was designed to explore the safety of EDR after PD. METHODS: A total of 112 patients undergoing PD with dra...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9554647/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36249020 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.993901 |
_version_ | 1784806746185793536 |
---|---|
author | Xie, Xuehai Chen, Kai Liu, Zonghao Wang, Feng Ma, Yongsu Zhang, Shupeng Shao, Zhijiang Yang, Yinmo Tian, Xiaodong |
author_facet | Xie, Xuehai Chen, Kai Liu, Zonghao Wang, Feng Ma, Yongsu Zhang, Shupeng Shao, Zhijiang Yang, Yinmo Tian, Xiaodong |
author_sort | Xie, Xuehai |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The effects of early drain removal (EDR) on postoperative complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) remains to be investigated. This single-center retrospective cohort study was designed to explore the safety of EDR after PD. METHODS: A total of 112 patients undergoing PD with drain fluid amylase (DFA) on postoperative day (POD) 1 and 3 <= 5000 were divided into EDR and late drain removal (LDR). Propensity Score Matching (PSM) was used. We compared postoperative outcomes between two groups and explore the risk factors of total complications using univariate and multiple logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: No statistical differences were found in primary outcomes, including Grade B/C postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) (Original cohort: 5.71% vs. 3.90%; P = 1.000; PSM cohort: 3.33% vs. 6.67%; P = 1.000), and total complications (Original cohort: 17.14% vs. 32.47%; P = 0.093; PSM cohort: 13.33% vs. 33.33%; P = 0.067). The EDR was associated with shorter in-hospital stay (Original cohort: 11 days vs. 15 days; P < 0.0001; PSM cohort: 11 days vs. 15 days; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: EDR on POD 3 is safe for patients undergoing PD with low risk of POPF. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9554647 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95546472022-10-13 Safety evaluation of early drain removal following pancreaticoduodenectomy: A single-center retrospective cohort study Xie, Xuehai Chen, Kai Liu, Zonghao Wang, Feng Ma, Yongsu Zhang, Shupeng Shao, Zhijiang Yang, Yinmo Tian, Xiaodong Front Oncol Oncology OBJECTIVES: The effects of early drain removal (EDR) on postoperative complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) remains to be investigated. This single-center retrospective cohort study was designed to explore the safety of EDR after PD. METHODS: A total of 112 patients undergoing PD with drain fluid amylase (DFA) on postoperative day (POD) 1 and 3 <= 5000 were divided into EDR and late drain removal (LDR). Propensity Score Matching (PSM) was used. We compared postoperative outcomes between two groups and explore the risk factors of total complications using univariate and multiple logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: No statistical differences were found in primary outcomes, including Grade B/C postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) (Original cohort: 5.71% vs. 3.90%; P = 1.000; PSM cohort: 3.33% vs. 6.67%; P = 1.000), and total complications (Original cohort: 17.14% vs. 32.47%; P = 0.093; PSM cohort: 13.33% vs. 33.33%; P = 0.067). The EDR was associated with shorter in-hospital stay (Original cohort: 11 days vs. 15 days; P < 0.0001; PSM cohort: 11 days vs. 15 days; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: EDR on POD 3 is safe for patients undergoing PD with low risk of POPF. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9554647/ /pubmed/36249020 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.993901 Text en Copyright © 2022 Xie, Chen, Liu, Wang, Ma, Zhang, Shao, Yang and Tian https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Oncology Xie, Xuehai Chen, Kai Liu, Zonghao Wang, Feng Ma, Yongsu Zhang, Shupeng Shao, Zhijiang Yang, Yinmo Tian, Xiaodong Safety evaluation of early drain removal following pancreaticoduodenectomy: A single-center retrospective cohort study |
title | Safety evaluation of early drain removal following pancreaticoduodenectomy: A single-center retrospective cohort study |
title_full | Safety evaluation of early drain removal following pancreaticoduodenectomy: A single-center retrospective cohort study |
title_fullStr | Safety evaluation of early drain removal following pancreaticoduodenectomy: A single-center retrospective cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | Safety evaluation of early drain removal following pancreaticoduodenectomy: A single-center retrospective cohort study |
title_short | Safety evaluation of early drain removal following pancreaticoduodenectomy: A single-center retrospective cohort study |
title_sort | safety evaluation of early drain removal following pancreaticoduodenectomy: a single-center retrospective cohort study |
topic | Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9554647/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36249020 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.993901 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT xiexuehai safetyevaluationofearlydrainremovalfollowingpancreaticoduodenectomyasinglecenterretrospectivecohortstudy AT chenkai safetyevaluationofearlydrainremovalfollowingpancreaticoduodenectomyasinglecenterretrospectivecohortstudy AT liuzonghao safetyevaluationofearlydrainremovalfollowingpancreaticoduodenectomyasinglecenterretrospectivecohortstudy AT wangfeng safetyevaluationofearlydrainremovalfollowingpancreaticoduodenectomyasinglecenterretrospectivecohortstudy AT mayongsu safetyevaluationofearlydrainremovalfollowingpancreaticoduodenectomyasinglecenterretrospectivecohortstudy AT zhangshupeng safetyevaluationofearlydrainremovalfollowingpancreaticoduodenectomyasinglecenterretrospectivecohortstudy AT shaozhijiang safetyevaluationofearlydrainremovalfollowingpancreaticoduodenectomyasinglecenterretrospectivecohortstudy AT yangyinmo safetyevaluationofearlydrainremovalfollowingpancreaticoduodenectomyasinglecenterretrospectivecohortstudy AT tianxiaodong safetyevaluationofearlydrainremovalfollowingpancreaticoduodenectomyasinglecenterretrospectivecohortstudy |