A Review on Glaucoma Drainage Devices and its Complications

Glaucoma is one of the leading causes of blindness in the world. It is an ocular disorder that may have multiple etiologies and which can present as optic neuropathy and increased intraocular pressure (IOP), but in some cases like normotensive glaucoma, the IOP may remain normal. Its gradually progressive nature makes it important for early diagnosis; although the loss of vision is slow, lost vision can't be restored. Glaucoma drainage implant surgeries are an increasingly popular option in recent days in complicated cases of glaucoma where the previous trabeculectomy had failed and medical management was not responsive. Glaucoma drainage devices (GDD) are of various designs; they are implanted according to the patient condition and surgeons' preference. There are complications after the implantation of a GDD like hypotony, endophthalmitis, migration of the plate, extrusion, erosion of the mucous membrane, etc. In the market, there are various drainage devices present, but some of them are frequently used and popular. In this article, we will discuss some most commonly used GDDs and their complications. Among these, four are the most popular: Molteno, Baerveldt, Krupin, and Ahmed. The failure rate of the GDD is low. In many studies, it has been noted that only half of the GDD remains functional after five years. Therefore, further studies are still being conducted to refine the biomaterials, techniques, and shape of the GDD. The technique of surgery is also very much crucial in the success of GDD implantation. The glaucoma type is an essential factor in deciding the treatment, and the outcome of the surgery also depends on it.