Correlation study between multiplanar reconstruction trigeminal nerve angulation and trigeminal neuralgia

OBJECTIVES: Neurovascular compression (NVC) produces morphological changes on the trigeminal nerve root is considered the cause of trigeminal neuralgia (TN), but there were some patients with TN found no NVC, and also NVC was found in asymptomatic individuals. Many studies found tight relationships of TN and morphological structures of trigeminal nerve. We designed this study to explore the correlation between multiplanar reconstruction (MPR) trigeminal nerve angulation (TNA) and TN. METHODS: Patients with classical symptoms of TN were recruited as observation group (OG) in this study, 50 healthy controls were enrolled as control group (CG), the OG was further subtyped into young patients (YP), middle-aged patients (MP) and old patients (OP) based to the onset age of symptoms, and also divided into patients with or without trigger maneuvers (TM) based on the presence of TM or not. All the participants underwent magnetic resonance (MR) examinations in same device, bilateral TNA measurements were carried out in OG and CG, then TNA was compared between different groups or subgroups. All images were interpreted by two radiologists who were blinded to the study, diagnosis of TN was made by two senior neurosurgery professors. RESULT: Ultimately, 95 patients with primary TN were recruited in OG, aged from 25 to 84 (61.15 ± 12.70) years with a course of 0.5 to 30 (5.03 ± 5.41) years, their onset age ranged from 24 to 82 (56.13 ± 11.98) years. There were 34 males and 61 females in OG, and 58 cases involved right side. The CG aged from 22 to 85 (61.86 ± 13.03) years. No statistical difference was found between the age of OG and CG(p = 0.76), and also the bilateral TNA of CG (154.92 ± 16.90° vs 155.55 ± 17.03°, p > 0.05), while TNA of OG was significantly smaller than CG (150.78 ± 11.29° vs 155.24 ± 16.88°, p = 0.019). In OG, TNA on the affected side was significantly smaller than the unaffected side (149.29 ± 12.44° vs 152.27 ± 9.85°, p = 0.014). TNA showed a positive correlation with onset age of patients with TN, as TNA on the affected side of YP was significantly smaller than MP and OP (139.00 ± 11.64° vs 148.86 ± 11.54°, 139.00 ± 11.64° vs 152.18 ± 12.61°, p = 0.004 and 0.026). Furthermore, patients with TM showed smaller TNA than those without TM (147.05 ± 11.30° vs 164.75 ± 8.39°, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggested that TNA might play a role in TN, small TNA could be a risk factor of TN. Furthermore, patients with small TNA are more likely to combine with TM, but more studies are needed to explore the exact role of TNA in TN.