Cargando…
Telehealth Made EASY: Understanding Provider Perceptions of Telehealth Appropriateness in Outpatient Rheumatology Encounters
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate a novel scoring system, the Encounter Appropriateness Score for You (EASY), to assess provider perceptions of telehealth appropriateness in rheumatology encounters. METHODS: The EASY scoring system prompts providers to rate their own encounters as...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9555194/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35855564 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acr2.11470 |
_version_ | 1784806854789955584 |
---|---|
author | Smith, Isaac D. Coles, Theresa M. Howe, Catherine Overton, Robert Economou‐Zavlanos, Nicoleta Solomon, Mary J. Zhao, Rong Adagarla, Bhargav Doss, Jayanth Henao, Ricardo Clowse, Megan E. B. Leverenz, David L. |
author_facet | Smith, Isaac D. Coles, Theresa M. Howe, Catherine Overton, Robert Economou‐Zavlanos, Nicoleta Solomon, Mary J. Zhao, Rong Adagarla, Bhargav Doss, Jayanth Henao, Ricardo Clowse, Megan E. B. Leverenz, David L. |
author_sort | Smith, Isaac D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate a novel scoring system, the Encounter Appropriateness Score for You (EASY), to assess provider perceptions of telehealth appropriateness in rheumatology encounters. METHODS: The EASY scoring system prompts providers to rate their own encounters as follows: in‐person or telehealth acceptable, EASY = 1; in‐person preferred, EASY = 2; or telehealth preferred, EASY = 3. Assessment of the EASY scoring system occurred at a single academic institution from January 1, 2021, to August 31, 2021. Data were collected in three rounds: 1) initial survey (31 providers) assessing EASY responsiveness to five hypothetical scenarios, 2) follow‐up survey (34 providers) exploring EASY responsiveness to 11 scenario modifications, and 3) assessment of EASYs documented in clinic care. RESULTS: The initial and follow‐up surveys demonstrated responsiveness of EASYs to different clinical and nonclinical factors. For instance, less than 20% of providers accepted telehealth when starting a biologic for active rheumatoid arthritis, although more than 35% accepted telehealth in the same scenario if the patient lived far away or was well known to the provider. Regarding EASY documentation, 27 providers provided EASYs for 12,381 encounters. According to these scores, telehealth was acceptable or preferred for 29.7% of all encounters, including 21.4% of in‐person encounters. Conversely, 24.4% of telehealth encounters were scored as in‐person preferred. CONCLUSION: EASY is simple, understandable, and responsive to changes in the clinical scenario. We have successfully accumulated 12,381 EASYs that can be studied in future work to better understand telehealth utility and optimize telehealth triage. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9555194 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Wiley Periodicals, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95551942022-10-16 Telehealth Made EASY: Understanding Provider Perceptions of Telehealth Appropriateness in Outpatient Rheumatology Encounters Smith, Isaac D. Coles, Theresa M. Howe, Catherine Overton, Robert Economou‐Zavlanos, Nicoleta Solomon, Mary J. Zhao, Rong Adagarla, Bhargav Doss, Jayanth Henao, Ricardo Clowse, Megan E. B. Leverenz, David L. ACR Open Rheumatol Original Articles OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate a novel scoring system, the Encounter Appropriateness Score for You (EASY), to assess provider perceptions of telehealth appropriateness in rheumatology encounters. METHODS: The EASY scoring system prompts providers to rate their own encounters as follows: in‐person or telehealth acceptable, EASY = 1; in‐person preferred, EASY = 2; or telehealth preferred, EASY = 3. Assessment of the EASY scoring system occurred at a single academic institution from January 1, 2021, to August 31, 2021. Data were collected in three rounds: 1) initial survey (31 providers) assessing EASY responsiveness to five hypothetical scenarios, 2) follow‐up survey (34 providers) exploring EASY responsiveness to 11 scenario modifications, and 3) assessment of EASYs documented in clinic care. RESULTS: The initial and follow‐up surveys demonstrated responsiveness of EASYs to different clinical and nonclinical factors. For instance, less than 20% of providers accepted telehealth when starting a biologic for active rheumatoid arthritis, although more than 35% accepted telehealth in the same scenario if the patient lived far away or was well known to the provider. Regarding EASY documentation, 27 providers provided EASYs for 12,381 encounters. According to these scores, telehealth was acceptable or preferred for 29.7% of all encounters, including 21.4% of in‐person encounters. Conversely, 24.4% of telehealth encounters were scored as in‐person preferred. CONCLUSION: EASY is simple, understandable, and responsive to changes in the clinical scenario. We have successfully accumulated 12,381 EASYs that can be studied in future work to better understand telehealth utility and optimize telehealth triage. Wiley Periodicals, Inc. 2022-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9555194/ /pubmed/35855564 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acr2.11470 Text en © 2022 The Authors. ACR Open Rheumatology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Rheumatology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Smith, Isaac D. Coles, Theresa M. Howe, Catherine Overton, Robert Economou‐Zavlanos, Nicoleta Solomon, Mary J. Zhao, Rong Adagarla, Bhargav Doss, Jayanth Henao, Ricardo Clowse, Megan E. B. Leverenz, David L. Telehealth Made EASY: Understanding Provider Perceptions of Telehealth Appropriateness in Outpatient Rheumatology Encounters |
title | Telehealth Made EASY: Understanding Provider Perceptions of Telehealth Appropriateness in Outpatient Rheumatology Encounters |
title_full | Telehealth Made EASY: Understanding Provider Perceptions of Telehealth Appropriateness in Outpatient Rheumatology Encounters |
title_fullStr | Telehealth Made EASY: Understanding Provider Perceptions of Telehealth Appropriateness in Outpatient Rheumatology Encounters |
title_full_unstemmed | Telehealth Made EASY: Understanding Provider Perceptions of Telehealth Appropriateness in Outpatient Rheumatology Encounters |
title_short | Telehealth Made EASY: Understanding Provider Perceptions of Telehealth Appropriateness in Outpatient Rheumatology Encounters |
title_sort | telehealth made easy: understanding provider perceptions of telehealth appropriateness in outpatient rheumatology encounters |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9555194/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35855564 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acr2.11470 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT smithisaacd telehealthmadeeasyunderstandingproviderperceptionsoftelehealthappropriatenessinoutpatientrheumatologyencounters AT colestheresam telehealthmadeeasyunderstandingproviderperceptionsoftelehealthappropriatenessinoutpatientrheumatologyencounters AT howecatherine telehealthmadeeasyunderstandingproviderperceptionsoftelehealthappropriatenessinoutpatientrheumatologyencounters AT overtonrobert telehealthmadeeasyunderstandingproviderperceptionsoftelehealthappropriatenessinoutpatientrheumatologyencounters AT economouzavlanosnicoleta telehealthmadeeasyunderstandingproviderperceptionsoftelehealthappropriatenessinoutpatientrheumatologyencounters AT solomonmaryj telehealthmadeeasyunderstandingproviderperceptionsoftelehealthappropriatenessinoutpatientrheumatologyencounters AT zhaorong telehealthmadeeasyunderstandingproviderperceptionsoftelehealthappropriatenessinoutpatientrheumatologyencounters AT adagarlabhargav telehealthmadeeasyunderstandingproviderperceptionsoftelehealthappropriatenessinoutpatientrheumatologyencounters AT dossjayanth telehealthmadeeasyunderstandingproviderperceptionsoftelehealthappropriatenessinoutpatientrheumatologyencounters AT henaoricardo telehealthmadeeasyunderstandingproviderperceptionsoftelehealthappropriatenessinoutpatientrheumatologyencounters AT clowsemeganeb telehealthmadeeasyunderstandingproviderperceptionsoftelehealthappropriatenessinoutpatientrheumatologyencounters AT leverenzdavidl telehealthmadeeasyunderstandingproviderperceptionsoftelehealthappropriatenessinoutpatientrheumatologyencounters |