Cargando…

Telehealth Made EASY: Understanding Provider Perceptions of Telehealth Appropriateness in Outpatient Rheumatology Encounters

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate a novel scoring system, the Encounter Appropriateness Score for You (EASY), to assess provider perceptions of telehealth appropriateness in rheumatology encounters. METHODS: The EASY scoring system prompts providers to rate their own encounters as...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Smith, Isaac D., Coles, Theresa M., Howe, Catherine, Overton, Robert, Economou‐Zavlanos, Nicoleta, Solomon, Mary J., Zhao, Rong, Adagarla, Bhargav, Doss, Jayanth, Henao, Ricardo, Clowse, Megan E. B., Leverenz, David L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wiley Periodicals, Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9555194/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35855564
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acr2.11470
_version_ 1784806854789955584
author Smith, Isaac D.
Coles, Theresa M.
Howe, Catherine
Overton, Robert
Economou‐Zavlanos, Nicoleta
Solomon, Mary J.
Zhao, Rong
Adagarla, Bhargav
Doss, Jayanth
Henao, Ricardo
Clowse, Megan E. B.
Leverenz, David L.
author_facet Smith, Isaac D.
Coles, Theresa M.
Howe, Catherine
Overton, Robert
Economou‐Zavlanos, Nicoleta
Solomon, Mary J.
Zhao, Rong
Adagarla, Bhargav
Doss, Jayanth
Henao, Ricardo
Clowse, Megan E. B.
Leverenz, David L.
author_sort Smith, Isaac D.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate a novel scoring system, the Encounter Appropriateness Score for You (EASY), to assess provider perceptions of telehealth appropriateness in rheumatology encounters. METHODS: The EASY scoring system prompts providers to rate their own encounters as follows: in‐person or telehealth acceptable, EASY = 1; in‐person preferred, EASY = 2; or telehealth preferred, EASY = 3. Assessment of the EASY scoring system occurred at a single academic institution from January 1, 2021, to August 31, 2021. Data were collected in three rounds: 1) initial survey (31 providers) assessing EASY responsiveness to five hypothetical scenarios, 2) follow‐up survey (34 providers) exploring EASY responsiveness to 11 scenario modifications, and 3) assessment of EASYs documented in clinic care. RESULTS: The initial and follow‐up surveys demonstrated responsiveness of EASYs to different clinical and nonclinical factors. For instance, less than 20% of providers accepted telehealth when starting a biologic for active rheumatoid arthritis, although more than 35% accepted telehealth in the same scenario if the patient lived far away or was well known to the provider. Regarding EASY documentation, 27 providers provided EASYs for 12,381 encounters. According to these scores, telehealth was acceptable or preferred for 29.7% of all encounters, including 21.4% of in‐person encounters. Conversely, 24.4% of telehealth encounters were scored as in‐person preferred. CONCLUSION: EASY is simple, understandable, and responsive to changes in the clinical scenario. We have successfully accumulated 12,381 EASYs that can be studied in future work to better understand telehealth utility and optimize telehealth triage.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9555194
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95551942022-10-16 Telehealth Made EASY: Understanding Provider Perceptions of Telehealth Appropriateness in Outpatient Rheumatology Encounters Smith, Isaac D. Coles, Theresa M. Howe, Catherine Overton, Robert Economou‐Zavlanos, Nicoleta Solomon, Mary J. Zhao, Rong Adagarla, Bhargav Doss, Jayanth Henao, Ricardo Clowse, Megan E. B. Leverenz, David L. ACR Open Rheumatol Original Articles OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate a novel scoring system, the Encounter Appropriateness Score for You (EASY), to assess provider perceptions of telehealth appropriateness in rheumatology encounters. METHODS: The EASY scoring system prompts providers to rate their own encounters as follows: in‐person or telehealth acceptable, EASY = 1; in‐person preferred, EASY = 2; or telehealth preferred, EASY = 3. Assessment of the EASY scoring system occurred at a single academic institution from January 1, 2021, to August 31, 2021. Data were collected in three rounds: 1) initial survey (31 providers) assessing EASY responsiveness to five hypothetical scenarios, 2) follow‐up survey (34 providers) exploring EASY responsiveness to 11 scenario modifications, and 3) assessment of EASYs documented in clinic care. RESULTS: The initial and follow‐up surveys demonstrated responsiveness of EASYs to different clinical and nonclinical factors. For instance, less than 20% of providers accepted telehealth when starting a biologic for active rheumatoid arthritis, although more than 35% accepted telehealth in the same scenario if the patient lived far away or was well known to the provider. Regarding EASY documentation, 27 providers provided EASYs for 12,381 encounters. According to these scores, telehealth was acceptable or preferred for 29.7% of all encounters, including 21.4% of in‐person encounters. Conversely, 24.4% of telehealth encounters were scored as in‐person preferred. CONCLUSION: EASY is simple, understandable, and responsive to changes in the clinical scenario. We have successfully accumulated 12,381 EASYs that can be studied in future work to better understand telehealth utility and optimize telehealth triage. Wiley Periodicals, Inc. 2022-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9555194/ /pubmed/35855564 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acr2.11470 Text en © 2022 The Authors. ACR Open Rheumatology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Rheumatology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Smith, Isaac D.
Coles, Theresa M.
Howe, Catherine
Overton, Robert
Economou‐Zavlanos, Nicoleta
Solomon, Mary J.
Zhao, Rong
Adagarla, Bhargav
Doss, Jayanth
Henao, Ricardo
Clowse, Megan E. B.
Leverenz, David L.
Telehealth Made EASY: Understanding Provider Perceptions of Telehealth Appropriateness in Outpatient Rheumatology Encounters
title Telehealth Made EASY: Understanding Provider Perceptions of Telehealth Appropriateness in Outpatient Rheumatology Encounters
title_full Telehealth Made EASY: Understanding Provider Perceptions of Telehealth Appropriateness in Outpatient Rheumatology Encounters
title_fullStr Telehealth Made EASY: Understanding Provider Perceptions of Telehealth Appropriateness in Outpatient Rheumatology Encounters
title_full_unstemmed Telehealth Made EASY: Understanding Provider Perceptions of Telehealth Appropriateness in Outpatient Rheumatology Encounters
title_short Telehealth Made EASY: Understanding Provider Perceptions of Telehealth Appropriateness in Outpatient Rheumatology Encounters
title_sort telehealth made easy: understanding provider perceptions of telehealth appropriateness in outpatient rheumatology encounters
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9555194/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35855564
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acr2.11470
work_keys_str_mv AT smithisaacd telehealthmadeeasyunderstandingproviderperceptionsoftelehealthappropriatenessinoutpatientrheumatologyencounters
AT colestheresam telehealthmadeeasyunderstandingproviderperceptionsoftelehealthappropriatenessinoutpatientrheumatologyencounters
AT howecatherine telehealthmadeeasyunderstandingproviderperceptionsoftelehealthappropriatenessinoutpatientrheumatologyencounters
AT overtonrobert telehealthmadeeasyunderstandingproviderperceptionsoftelehealthappropriatenessinoutpatientrheumatologyencounters
AT economouzavlanosnicoleta telehealthmadeeasyunderstandingproviderperceptionsoftelehealthappropriatenessinoutpatientrheumatologyencounters
AT solomonmaryj telehealthmadeeasyunderstandingproviderperceptionsoftelehealthappropriatenessinoutpatientrheumatologyencounters
AT zhaorong telehealthmadeeasyunderstandingproviderperceptionsoftelehealthappropriatenessinoutpatientrheumatologyencounters
AT adagarlabhargav telehealthmadeeasyunderstandingproviderperceptionsoftelehealthappropriatenessinoutpatientrheumatologyencounters
AT dossjayanth telehealthmadeeasyunderstandingproviderperceptionsoftelehealthappropriatenessinoutpatientrheumatologyencounters
AT henaoricardo telehealthmadeeasyunderstandingproviderperceptionsoftelehealthappropriatenessinoutpatientrheumatologyencounters
AT clowsemeganeb telehealthmadeeasyunderstandingproviderperceptionsoftelehealthappropriatenessinoutpatientrheumatologyencounters
AT leverenzdavidl telehealthmadeeasyunderstandingproviderperceptionsoftelehealthappropriatenessinoutpatientrheumatologyencounters