Cargando…

Comparison of the anxiety level between the medical staff and the public during the early phase of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic

BACKGROUND: A sudden outbreak of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) started in December 2019 in Wuhan, China. Up-to-date, there have been limited studies examining the anxiety status of Chinese individuals in the early phase of the pandemic period (January 30, 2020–February 15, 2020). This surv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Luo, Guanguan, Liu, Yumin, Yao, Dongai, Ni, Shaozhou, Wu, Bangsheng, Lin, Liting, Wang, Yunming
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9555553/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37521813
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/EC9.0000000000000038
_version_ 1784806892016500736
author Luo, Guanguan
Liu, Yumin
Yao, Dongai
Ni, Shaozhou
Wu, Bangsheng
Lin, Liting
Wang, Yunming
author_facet Luo, Guanguan
Liu, Yumin
Yao, Dongai
Ni, Shaozhou
Wu, Bangsheng
Lin, Liting
Wang, Yunming
author_sort Luo, Guanguan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A sudden outbreak of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) started in December 2019 in Wuhan, China. Up-to-date, there have been limited studies examining the anxiety status of Chinese individuals in the early phase of the pandemic period (January 30, 2020–February 15, 2020). This survey aimed to compare the level of anxiety of the medical staff with that of the public and to provide a theoretical basis for developing an effective psychological intervention. METHOD: Questionnaires were sent on the Internet (http://www.wjx.cn) during this period. The anxiety levels of Chinese people were investigated using the Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), and the demographic data were collected simultaneously. RESULTS: A total of 1110 participants were enrolled in this study, with an effective response rate of 100%. A total of 482 respondents were medical staff (43.4%), while 628 were members of the general public (56.6%). The medical staff itself had a higher SAS score than the general public (48.36±13.40 vs. 45.74±11.79, P < 0.01), while the medical staff in Wuhan were more anxious than the public in Wuhan with a higher SAS score (54.17±14.08 vs. 48.53±11.92, P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant impact on the anxiety levels of the medical staff and the public, with the medical personnel showing a higher anxiety level than the public, especially female medical staff in Wuhan. Therefore, urgent intervention programs to reduce anxiety should be implemented.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9555553
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95555532022-10-14 Comparison of the anxiety level between the medical staff and the public during the early phase of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic Luo, Guanguan Liu, Yumin Yao, Dongai Ni, Shaozhou Wu, Bangsheng Lin, Liting Wang, Yunming Emergency and Critical Care Medicine Original Article BACKGROUND: A sudden outbreak of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) started in December 2019 in Wuhan, China. Up-to-date, there have been limited studies examining the anxiety status of Chinese individuals in the early phase of the pandemic period (January 30, 2020–February 15, 2020). This survey aimed to compare the level of anxiety of the medical staff with that of the public and to provide a theoretical basis for developing an effective psychological intervention. METHOD: Questionnaires were sent on the Internet (http://www.wjx.cn) during this period. The anxiety levels of Chinese people were investigated using the Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS), and the demographic data were collected simultaneously. RESULTS: A total of 1110 participants were enrolled in this study, with an effective response rate of 100%. A total of 482 respondents were medical staff (43.4%), while 628 were members of the general public (56.6%). The medical staff itself had a higher SAS score than the general public (48.36±13.40 vs. 45.74±11.79, P < 0.01), while the medical staff in Wuhan were more anxious than the public in Wuhan with a higher SAS score (54.17±14.08 vs. 48.53±11.92, P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant impact on the anxiety levels of the medical staff and the public, with the medical personnel showing a higher anxiety level than the public, especially female medical staff in Wuhan. Therefore, urgent intervention programs to reduce anxiety should be implemented. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-09 2022-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9555553/ /pubmed/37521813 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/EC9.0000000000000038 Text en Copyright © 2022 Shandong University, published by Wolters Kluwer, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the COVID-19 pandemic or until permissions are revoked in writing. Upon expiration of these permissions, PMC is granted a perpetual license to make this article available via PMC and Europe PMC, consistent with existing copyright protections.
spellingShingle Original Article
Luo, Guanguan
Liu, Yumin
Yao, Dongai
Ni, Shaozhou
Wu, Bangsheng
Lin, Liting
Wang, Yunming
Comparison of the anxiety level between the medical staff and the public during the early phase of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic
title Comparison of the anxiety level between the medical staff and the public during the early phase of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic
title_full Comparison of the anxiety level between the medical staff and the public during the early phase of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic
title_fullStr Comparison of the anxiety level between the medical staff and the public during the early phase of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the anxiety level between the medical staff and the public during the early phase of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic
title_short Comparison of the anxiety level between the medical staff and the public during the early phase of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic
title_sort comparison of the anxiety level between the medical staff and the public during the early phase of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9555553/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37521813
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/EC9.0000000000000038
work_keys_str_mv AT luoguanguan comparisonoftheanxietylevelbetweenthemedicalstaffandthepublicduringtheearlyphaseofthecoronavirusdisease2019pandemic
AT liuyumin comparisonoftheanxietylevelbetweenthemedicalstaffandthepublicduringtheearlyphaseofthecoronavirusdisease2019pandemic
AT yaodongai comparisonoftheanxietylevelbetweenthemedicalstaffandthepublicduringtheearlyphaseofthecoronavirusdisease2019pandemic
AT nishaozhou comparisonoftheanxietylevelbetweenthemedicalstaffandthepublicduringtheearlyphaseofthecoronavirusdisease2019pandemic
AT wubangsheng comparisonoftheanxietylevelbetweenthemedicalstaffandthepublicduringtheearlyphaseofthecoronavirusdisease2019pandemic
AT linliting comparisonoftheanxietylevelbetweenthemedicalstaffandthepublicduringtheearlyphaseofthecoronavirusdisease2019pandemic
AT wangyunming comparisonoftheanxietylevelbetweenthemedicalstaffandthepublicduringtheearlyphaseofthecoronavirusdisease2019pandemic