Cargando…
Identification of actions to be taken by managers to facilitate the return to work of cancer survivors: Consensus between managers and cancer survivors
BACKGROUND: Managers are considered to be main stakeholders in the return to work (RTW) of cancer survivors. However, the perspectives of cancer survivors and managers differ on what managerial actions should be taken during the RTW of cancer survivors. This difference might put effective collaborat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9555691/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36224592 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-14271-w |
_version_ | 1784806916814274560 |
---|---|
author | Porro, B. Tamminga, S. J. de Boer, A. G.E.M. Petit, A. Roquelaure, Y. Greidanus, M. A. |
author_facet | Porro, B. Tamminga, S. J. de Boer, A. G.E.M. Petit, A. Roquelaure, Y. Greidanus, M. A. |
author_sort | Porro, B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Managers are considered to be main stakeholders in the return to work (RTW) of cancer survivors. However, the perspectives of cancer survivors and managers differ on what managerial actions should be taken during the RTW of cancer survivors. This difference might put effective collaboration and successful RTW at risk. Therefore, this study aims to reach consensus among managers and cancer survivors on the managerial actions to be taken during the four different RTW phases of cancer survivors (i.e., Disclosure, Treatment, RTW plan, Actual RTW). METHODS: The Technique for Research of Information by Animation of a Group of Experts (TRIAGE) was implemented with managers and cancer survivors (hereafter referred to as “experts”). An initial list of 24 actions was derived from a previous study. Firstly, for each action, fifteen experts were asked to indicate individually how important this action is per RTW phase (Likert scale from 1 – “Not important at all” to 6 – “Very important”). Consensus was reached when ≥ 80% (i.e., ≥ twelve experts) of the experts rated that action ≥5. Secondly, for each phase of the RTW process, the 15 actions with the highest percentage were discussed with eight experts during the collective consultation, except for the actions that already reached consensus. After discussion, the experts voted whether each action was important (“yes” / “no”) and consensus required ≥ 87.5% (i.e., ≥ seven experts) of the experts to consider an action as important. RESULTS: Twenty-five managerial actions were finally retained for at least one of the RTW phases, e.g., Disclosure: “respect privacy” and “radiate a positive attitude”, Treatment: “show appreciation” and “allow sufficient sick leave”, RTW Plan: “tailor” and “communicate”, and Actual RTW: “support practically” and “balance interest”. CONCLUSION: Cancer survivors and managers reached consensus on the importance of 25 managerial actions, distributed into each phase of the RTW process. These actions should be considered an interplay of managerial actions by different stakeholders on the part of the employer (e.g., direct supervisor, HR-manager), and should be a responsibility that is shared by these stakeholders. The collective implementation of these actions within the company will help cancer survivors feel fully supported. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-022-14271-w. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9555691 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95556912022-10-13 Identification of actions to be taken by managers to facilitate the return to work of cancer survivors: Consensus between managers and cancer survivors Porro, B. Tamminga, S. J. de Boer, A. G.E.M. Petit, A. Roquelaure, Y. Greidanus, M. A. BMC Public Health Research BACKGROUND: Managers are considered to be main stakeholders in the return to work (RTW) of cancer survivors. However, the perspectives of cancer survivors and managers differ on what managerial actions should be taken during the RTW of cancer survivors. This difference might put effective collaboration and successful RTW at risk. Therefore, this study aims to reach consensus among managers and cancer survivors on the managerial actions to be taken during the four different RTW phases of cancer survivors (i.e., Disclosure, Treatment, RTW plan, Actual RTW). METHODS: The Technique for Research of Information by Animation of a Group of Experts (TRIAGE) was implemented with managers and cancer survivors (hereafter referred to as “experts”). An initial list of 24 actions was derived from a previous study. Firstly, for each action, fifteen experts were asked to indicate individually how important this action is per RTW phase (Likert scale from 1 – “Not important at all” to 6 – “Very important”). Consensus was reached when ≥ 80% (i.e., ≥ twelve experts) of the experts rated that action ≥5. Secondly, for each phase of the RTW process, the 15 actions with the highest percentage were discussed with eight experts during the collective consultation, except for the actions that already reached consensus. After discussion, the experts voted whether each action was important (“yes” / “no”) and consensus required ≥ 87.5% (i.e., ≥ seven experts) of the experts to consider an action as important. RESULTS: Twenty-five managerial actions were finally retained for at least one of the RTW phases, e.g., Disclosure: “respect privacy” and “radiate a positive attitude”, Treatment: “show appreciation” and “allow sufficient sick leave”, RTW Plan: “tailor” and “communicate”, and Actual RTW: “support practically” and “balance interest”. CONCLUSION: Cancer survivors and managers reached consensus on the importance of 25 managerial actions, distributed into each phase of the RTW process. These actions should be considered an interplay of managerial actions by different stakeholders on the part of the employer (e.g., direct supervisor, HR-manager), and should be a responsibility that is shared by these stakeholders. The collective implementation of these actions within the company will help cancer survivors feel fully supported. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12889-022-14271-w. BioMed Central 2022-10-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9555691/ /pubmed/36224592 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-14271-w Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Porro, B. Tamminga, S. J. de Boer, A. G.E.M. Petit, A. Roquelaure, Y. Greidanus, M. A. Identification of actions to be taken by managers to facilitate the return to work of cancer survivors: Consensus between managers and cancer survivors |
title | Identification of actions to be taken by managers to facilitate the return to work of cancer survivors: Consensus between managers and cancer survivors |
title_full | Identification of actions to be taken by managers to facilitate the return to work of cancer survivors: Consensus between managers and cancer survivors |
title_fullStr | Identification of actions to be taken by managers to facilitate the return to work of cancer survivors: Consensus between managers and cancer survivors |
title_full_unstemmed | Identification of actions to be taken by managers to facilitate the return to work of cancer survivors: Consensus between managers and cancer survivors |
title_short | Identification of actions to be taken by managers to facilitate the return to work of cancer survivors: Consensus between managers and cancer survivors |
title_sort | identification of actions to be taken by managers to facilitate the return to work of cancer survivors: consensus between managers and cancer survivors |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9555691/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36224592 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-14271-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT porrob identificationofactionstobetakenbymanagerstofacilitatethereturntoworkofcancersurvivorsconsensusbetweenmanagersandcancersurvivors AT tammingasj identificationofactionstobetakenbymanagerstofacilitatethereturntoworkofcancersurvivorsconsensusbetweenmanagersandcancersurvivors AT deboeragem identificationofactionstobetakenbymanagerstofacilitatethereturntoworkofcancersurvivorsconsensusbetweenmanagersandcancersurvivors AT petita identificationofactionstobetakenbymanagerstofacilitatethereturntoworkofcancersurvivorsconsensusbetweenmanagersandcancersurvivors AT roquelaurey identificationofactionstobetakenbymanagerstofacilitatethereturntoworkofcancersurvivorsconsensusbetweenmanagersandcancersurvivors AT greidanusma identificationofactionstobetakenbymanagerstofacilitatethereturntoworkofcancersurvivorsconsensusbetweenmanagersandcancersurvivors |