Cargando…
Remdesivir-related cost-effectiveness and cost and resource use evidence in COVID-19: a systematic review
BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has been a global health emergency since December 2019, leading to millions of deaths worldwide and placing significant pressures, including economic burden, on individual patients and healthcare systems. As of February 2022, remdesivir is...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9555695/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36224452 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s15010-022-01930-8 |
_version_ | 1784806917809373184 |
---|---|
author | Murton, Molly Drane, Emma Jarrett, James Cornely, Oliver A. Soriano, Alex |
author_facet | Murton, Molly Drane, Emma Jarrett, James Cornely, Oliver A. Soriano, Alex |
author_sort | Murton, Molly |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has been a global health emergency since December 2019, leading to millions of deaths worldwide and placing significant pressures, including economic burden, on individual patients and healthcare systems. As of February 2022, remdesivir is the only US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved treatment for severe COVID-19. This systematic literature review (SLR) aimed to summarise economic evaluations, and cost and resource use (CRU) evidence related to remdesivir during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Searches of MEDLINE, Embase the International Health Technology Assessment (HTA) database, reference lists, congresses and grey literature were performed in May 2021. Articles were reviewed for relevance against pre-specified criteria by two independent reviewers and study quality was assessed using published checklists. RESULTS: Eight studies reported resource use and five reported costs related to remdesivir. Over time, the prescription rate of remdesivir increased and time from disease onset to remdesivir initiation decreased. Remdesivir was associated with a 6% to 21.3% decrease in bed occupancy. Cost estimates for remdesivir ranged widely, from $10 to $780 for a 10-day course. In three out of four included economic evaluations, remdesivir treatment scenarios were cost-effective, ranging from ~ 8 to ~ 23% of the willingness-to-pay threshold for the respective country. CONCLUSIONS: Economic evidence relating to remdesivir should be interpreted with consideration of the broader clinical context, including patients’ characteristics and the timing of its administration. Nonetheless, remdesivir remains an important option for physicians in aiming to provide optimal care and relieve pressure on healthcare systems through shifting phases of the pandemic. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s15010-022-01930-8. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9555695 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95556952022-10-13 Remdesivir-related cost-effectiveness and cost and resource use evidence in COVID-19: a systematic review Murton, Molly Drane, Emma Jarrett, James Cornely, Oliver A. Soriano, Alex Infection Review BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has been a global health emergency since December 2019, leading to millions of deaths worldwide and placing significant pressures, including economic burden, on individual patients and healthcare systems. As of February 2022, remdesivir is the only US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved treatment for severe COVID-19. This systematic literature review (SLR) aimed to summarise economic evaluations, and cost and resource use (CRU) evidence related to remdesivir during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Searches of MEDLINE, Embase the International Health Technology Assessment (HTA) database, reference lists, congresses and grey literature were performed in May 2021. Articles were reviewed for relevance against pre-specified criteria by two independent reviewers and study quality was assessed using published checklists. RESULTS: Eight studies reported resource use and five reported costs related to remdesivir. Over time, the prescription rate of remdesivir increased and time from disease onset to remdesivir initiation decreased. Remdesivir was associated with a 6% to 21.3% decrease in bed occupancy. Cost estimates for remdesivir ranged widely, from $10 to $780 for a 10-day course. In three out of four included economic evaluations, remdesivir treatment scenarios were cost-effective, ranging from ~ 8 to ~ 23% of the willingness-to-pay threshold for the respective country. CONCLUSIONS: Economic evidence relating to remdesivir should be interpreted with consideration of the broader clinical context, including patients’ characteristics and the timing of its administration. Nonetheless, remdesivir remains an important option for physicians in aiming to provide optimal care and relieve pressure on healthcare systems through shifting phases of the pandemic. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s15010-022-01930-8. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-10-12 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9555695/ /pubmed/36224452 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s15010-022-01930-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Murton, Molly Drane, Emma Jarrett, James Cornely, Oliver A. Soriano, Alex Remdesivir-related cost-effectiveness and cost and resource use evidence in COVID-19: a systematic review |
title | Remdesivir-related cost-effectiveness and cost and resource use evidence in COVID-19: a systematic review |
title_full | Remdesivir-related cost-effectiveness and cost and resource use evidence in COVID-19: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Remdesivir-related cost-effectiveness and cost and resource use evidence in COVID-19: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Remdesivir-related cost-effectiveness and cost and resource use evidence in COVID-19: a systematic review |
title_short | Remdesivir-related cost-effectiveness and cost and resource use evidence in COVID-19: a systematic review |
title_sort | remdesivir-related cost-effectiveness and cost and resource use evidence in covid-19: a systematic review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9555695/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36224452 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s15010-022-01930-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT murtonmolly remdesivirrelatedcosteffectivenessandcostandresourceuseevidenceincovid19asystematicreview AT draneemma remdesivirrelatedcosteffectivenessandcostandresourceuseevidenceincovid19asystematicreview AT jarrettjames remdesivirrelatedcosteffectivenessandcostandresourceuseevidenceincovid19asystematicreview AT cornelyolivera remdesivirrelatedcosteffectivenessandcostandresourceuseevidenceincovid19asystematicreview AT sorianoalex remdesivirrelatedcosteffectivenessandcostandresourceuseevidenceincovid19asystematicreview |