Cargando…
Patient-reported outcomes via electronic health record portal versus telephone: a pragmatic randomized pilot trial of anxiety or depression symptoms in epilepsy
OBJECTIVE: To close gaps between research and clinical practice, tools are needed for efficient pragmatic trial recruitment and patient-reported outcome collection. The objective was to assess feasibility and process measures for patient-reported outcome collection in a randomized trial comparing el...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9555875/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36247085 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jamiaopen/ooac052 |
_version_ | 1784806948107976704 |
---|---|
author | Munger Clary, Heidi M Snively, Beverly M Topaloglu, Umit Duncan, Pamela Kimball, James Alexander, Halley Brenes, Gretchen A |
author_facet | Munger Clary, Heidi M Snively, Beverly M Topaloglu, Umit Duncan, Pamela Kimball, James Alexander, Halley Brenes, Gretchen A |
author_sort | Munger Clary, Heidi M |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To close gaps between research and clinical practice, tools are needed for efficient pragmatic trial recruitment and patient-reported outcome collection. The objective was to assess feasibility and process measures for patient-reported outcome collection in a randomized trial comparing electronic health record (EHR) patient portal questionnaires to telephone interview among adults with epilepsy and anxiety or depression symptoms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Recruitment for the randomized trial began at an epilepsy clinic visit, with EHR-embedded validated anxiety and depression instruments, followed by automated EHR-based research screening consent and eligibility assessment. Fully eligible individuals later completed telephone consent, enrollment, and randomization. Participants were randomized 1:1 to EHR portal versus telephone outcome assessment, and patient-reported and process outcomes were collected at 3 and 6 months, with primary outcome 6-month retention in EHR arm (feasibility target: ≥11 participants retained). RESULTS: Participants (N = 30) were 60% women, 77% White/non-Hispanic, with mean age 42.5 years. Among 15 individuals randomized to EHR portal, 10 (67%, CI 41.7%–84.8%) met the 6-month retention endpoint, versus 100% (CI 79.6%–100%) in the telephone group (P = 0.04). EHR outcome collection at 6 months required 11.8 min less research staff time per participant than telephone (5.9, CI 3.3–7.7 vs 17.7, CI 14.1–20.2). Subsequent telephone contact after unsuccessful EHR attempts enabled near complete data collection and still saved staff time. DISCUSSION: In this randomized study, EHR portal outcome assessment did not meet the retention feasibility target, but EHR method saved research staff time compared to telephone. CONCLUSION: While EHR portal outcome assessment was not feasible, hybrid EHR/telephone method was feasible and saved staff time. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9555875 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95558752022-10-13 Patient-reported outcomes via electronic health record portal versus telephone: a pragmatic randomized pilot trial of anxiety or depression symptoms in epilepsy Munger Clary, Heidi M Snively, Beverly M Topaloglu, Umit Duncan, Pamela Kimball, James Alexander, Halley Brenes, Gretchen A JAMIA Open Research and Applications OBJECTIVE: To close gaps between research and clinical practice, tools are needed for efficient pragmatic trial recruitment and patient-reported outcome collection. The objective was to assess feasibility and process measures for patient-reported outcome collection in a randomized trial comparing electronic health record (EHR) patient portal questionnaires to telephone interview among adults with epilepsy and anxiety or depression symptoms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Recruitment for the randomized trial began at an epilepsy clinic visit, with EHR-embedded validated anxiety and depression instruments, followed by automated EHR-based research screening consent and eligibility assessment. Fully eligible individuals later completed telephone consent, enrollment, and randomization. Participants were randomized 1:1 to EHR portal versus telephone outcome assessment, and patient-reported and process outcomes were collected at 3 and 6 months, with primary outcome 6-month retention in EHR arm (feasibility target: ≥11 participants retained). RESULTS: Participants (N = 30) were 60% women, 77% White/non-Hispanic, with mean age 42.5 years. Among 15 individuals randomized to EHR portal, 10 (67%, CI 41.7%–84.8%) met the 6-month retention endpoint, versus 100% (CI 79.6%–100%) in the telephone group (P = 0.04). EHR outcome collection at 6 months required 11.8 min less research staff time per participant than telephone (5.9, CI 3.3–7.7 vs 17.7, CI 14.1–20.2). Subsequent telephone contact after unsuccessful EHR attempts enabled near complete data collection and still saved staff time. DISCUSSION: In this randomized study, EHR portal outcome assessment did not meet the retention feasibility target, but EHR method saved research staff time compared to telephone. CONCLUSION: While EHR portal outcome assessment was not feasible, hybrid EHR/telephone method was feasible and saved staff time. Oxford University Press 2022-10-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9555875/ /pubmed/36247085 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jamiaopen/ooac052 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Medical Informatics Association. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Research and Applications Munger Clary, Heidi M Snively, Beverly M Topaloglu, Umit Duncan, Pamela Kimball, James Alexander, Halley Brenes, Gretchen A Patient-reported outcomes via electronic health record portal versus telephone: a pragmatic randomized pilot trial of anxiety or depression symptoms in epilepsy |
title | Patient-reported outcomes via electronic health record portal versus telephone: a pragmatic randomized pilot trial of anxiety or depression symptoms in epilepsy |
title_full | Patient-reported outcomes via electronic health record portal versus telephone: a pragmatic randomized pilot trial of anxiety or depression symptoms in epilepsy |
title_fullStr | Patient-reported outcomes via electronic health record portal versus telephone: a pragmatic randomized pilot trial of anxiety or depression symptoms in epilepsy |
title_full_unstemmed | Patient-reported outcomes via electronic health record portal versus telephone: a pragmatic randomized pilot trial of anxiety or depression symptoms in epilepsy |
title_short | Patient-reported outcomes via electronic health record portal versus telephone: a pragmatic randomized pilot trial of anxiety or depression symptoms in epilepsy |
title_sort | patient-reported outcomes via electronic health record portal versus telephone: a pragmatic randomized pilot trial of anxiety or depression symptoms in epilepsy |
topic | Research and Applications |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9555875/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36247085 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jamiaopen/ooac052 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mungerclaryheidim patientreportedoutcomesviaelectronichealthrecordportalversustelephoneapragmaticrandomizedpilottrialofanxietyordepressionsymptomsinepilepsy AT snivelybeverlym patientreportedoutcomesviaelectronichealthrecordportalversustelephoneapragmaticrandomizedpilottrialofanxietyordepressionsymptomsinepilepsy AT topalogluumit patientreportedoutcomesviaelectronichealthrecordportalversustelephoneapragmaticrandomizedpilottrialofanxietyordepressionsymptomsinepilepsy AT duncanpamela patientreportedoutcomesviaelectronichealthrecordportalversustelephoneapragmaticrandomizedpilottrialofanxietyordepressionsymptomsinepilepsy AT kimballjames patientreportedoutcomesviaelectronichealthrecordportalversustelephoneapragmaticrandomizedpilottrialofanxietyordepressionsymptomsinepilepsy AT alexanderhalley patientreportedoutcomesviaelectronichealthrecordportalversustelephoneapragmaticrandomizedpilottrialofanxietyordepressionsymptomsinepilepsy AT brenesgretchena patientreportedoutcomesviaelectronichealthrecordportalversustelephoneapragmaticrandomizedpilottrialofanxietyordepressionsymptomsinepilepsy |