Cargando…

Interposition arthroplasty for post-traumatic osteoarthritis of the elbow: a systematic review

PURPOSE: Interposition arthroplasty for the post-traumatic osteoarthritic elbow is a salvage procedure used in young and active patients and remains a rare and unexplored therapeutic option. METHODS: We systematically reviewed the available literature searching electronic databases, MEDLINE using th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lanzerath, Fabian, Hackl, Michael, Pucher, Christoph-Johannes, Leschinger, Tim, Uschok, Stephan, Müller, Lars P., Wegmann, Kilian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9556353/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36042057
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00264-022-05562-3
_version_ 1784807059073531904
author Lanzerath, Fabian
Hackl, Michael
Pucher, Christoph-Johannes
Leschinger, Tim
Uschok, Stephan
Müller, Lars P.
Wegmann, Kilian
author_facet Lanzerath, Fabian
Hackl, Michael
Pucher, Christoph-Johannes
Leschinger, Tim
Uschok, Stephan
Müller, Lars P.
Wegmann, Kilian
author_sort Lanzerath, Fabian
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Interposition arthroplasty for the post-traumatic osteoarthritic elbow is a salvage procedure used in young and active patients and remains a rare and unexplored therapeutic option. METHODS: We systematically reviewed the available literature searching electronic databases, MEDLINE using the PubMed interface and EMBASE. The primary objective was to synthesize functional outcomes and to investigate revision frequencies, but also complication and subsequent surgery rates among patients with surviving grafts. The preferred reporting guidelines for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines were applied. RESULTS: Five studies were left for inclusion, all retrospective in design, comprising 67 patients. The mean age was 40 years, the mean follow-up period was 61 months, and 68.2% of the patients treated were male. Eleven patients (16.4%) were treated with fascia lata autografts, and 56 patients (83.6%) were treated with Achilles tendon allografts. The graft survived in 53 patients (79.1%); the post-operative Mayo Elbow Performance Score averaged 69 points. Fourteen patients (20.9%) required revision surgery. In the setting of graft survival, 39.1% of patients had complications not requiring further surgical treatment and 5.7% of patients with surviving grafts needed subsequent operative treatment within the follow-up period. CONCLUSION: Given graft survival, this systematic review demonstrated satisfactory functional outcomes following interposition arthroplasty of the post-traumatic osteoarthritic elbow, however, associated with a cumulative complication and subsequent operative treatment rate of 44.8%. In addition, a revision rate of 20.9% needs to be expected. Varus-valgus instability in the pre-operative clinical assessment seems to be associated with unsatisfactory post-operative elbow function. The superiority of either of the two main reported graft methods (fascia lata autograft and Achilles tendon allograft) remains pending, and the role of an external fixator in preventing post-operative instability remains unresolved.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9556353
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95563532022-10-14 Interposition arthroplasty for post-traumatic osteoarthritis of the elbow: a systematic review Lanzerath, Fabian Hackl, Michael Pucher, Christoph-Johannes Leschinger, Tim Uschok, Stephan Müller, Lars P. Wegmann, Kilian Int Orthop Original Paper PURPOSE: Interposition arthroplasty for the post-traumatic osteoarthritic elbow is a salvage procedure used in young and active patients and remains a rare and unexplored therapeutic option. METHODS: We systematically reviewed the available literature searching electronic databases, MEDLINE using the PubMed interface and EMBASE. The primary objective was to synthesize functional outcomes and to investigate revision frequencies, but also complication and subsequent surgery rates among patients with surviving grafts. The preferred reporting guidelines for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines were applied. RESULTS: Five studies were left for inclusion, all retrospective in design, comprising 67 patients. The mean age was 40 years, the mean follow-up period was 61 months, and 68.2% of the patients treated were male. Eleven patients (16.4%) were treated with fascia lata autografts, and 56 patients (83.6%) were treated with Achilles tendon allografts. The graft survived in 53 patients (79.1%); the post-operative Mayo Elbow Performance Score averaged 69 points. Fourteen patients (20.9%) required revision surgery. In the setting of graft survival, 39.1% of patients had complications not requiring further surgical treatment and 5.7% of patients with surviving grafts needed subsequent operative treatment within the follow-up period. CONCLUSION: Given graft survival, this systematic review demonstrated satisfactory functional outcomes following interposition arthroplasty of the post-traumatic osteoarthritic elbow, however, associated with a cumulative complication and subsequent operative treatment rate of 44.8%. In addition, a revision rate of 20.9% needs to be expected. Varus-valgus instability in the pre-operative clinical assessment seems to be associated with unsatisfactory post-operative elbow function. The superiority of either of the two main reported graft methods (fascia lata autograft and Achilles tendon allograft) remains pending, and the role of an external fixator in preventing post-operative instability remains unresolved. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-08-30 2022-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9556353/ /pubmed/36042057 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00264-022-05562-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Paper
Lanzerath, Fabian
Hackl, Michael
Pucher, Christoph-Johannes
Leschinger, Tim
Uschok, Stephan
Müller, Lars P.
Wegmann, Kilian
Interposition arthroplasty for post-traumatic osteoarthritis of the elbow: a systematic review
title Interposition arthroplasty for post-traumatic osteoarthritis of the elbow: a systematic review
title_full Interposition arthroplasty for post-traumatic osteoarthritis of the elbow: a systematic review
title_fullStr Interposition arthroplasty for post-traumatic osteoarthritis of the elbow: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Interposition arthroplasty for post-traumatic osteoarthritis of the elbow: a systematic review
title_short Interposition arthroplasty for post-traumatic osteoarthritis of the elbow: a systematic review
title_sort interposition arthroplasty for post-traumatic osteoarthritis of the elbow: a systematic review
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9556353/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36042057
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00264-022-05562-3
work_keys_str_mv AT lanzerathfabian interpositionarthroplastyforposttraumaticosteoarthritisoftheelbowasystematicreview
AT hacklmichael interpositionarthroplastyforposttraumaticosteoarthritisoftheelbowasystematicreview
AT pucherchristophjohannes interpositionarthroplastyforposttraumaticosteoarthritisoftheelbowasystematicreview
AT leschingertim interpositionarthroplastyforposttraumaticosteoarthritisoftheelbowasystematicreview
AT uschokstephan interpositionarthroplastyforposttraumaticosteoarthritisoftheelbowasystematicreview
AT mullerlarsp interpositionarthroplastyforposttraumaticosteoarthritisoftheelbowasystematicreview
AT wegmannkilian interpositionarthroplastyforposttraumaticosteoarthritisoftheelbowasystematicreview