Cargando…
Interposition arthroplasty for post-traumatic osteoarthritis of the elbow: a systematic review
PURPOSE: Interposition arthroplasty for the post-traumatic osteoarthritic elbow is a salvage procedure used in young and active patients and remains a rare and unexplored therapeutic option. METHODS: We systematically reviewed the available literature searching electronic databases, MEDLINE using th...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9556353/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36042057 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00264-022-05562-3 |
_version_ | 1784807059073531904 |
---|---|
author | Lanzerath, Fabian Hackl, Michael Pucher, Christoph-Johannes Leschinger, Tim Uschok, Stephan Müller, Lars P. Wegmann, Kilian |
author_facet | Lanzerath, Fabian Hackl, Michael Pucher, Christoph-Johannes Leschinger, Tim Uschok, Stephan Müller, Lars P. Wegmann, Kilian |
author_sort | Lanzerath, Fabian |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Interposition arthroplasty for the post-traumatic osteoarthritic elbow is a salvage procedure used in young and active patients and remains a rare and unexplored therapeutic option. METHODS: We systematically reviewed the available literature searching electronic databases, MEDLINE using the PubMed interface and EMBASE. The primary objective was to synthesize functional outcomes and to investigate revision frequencies, but also complication and subsequent surgery rates among patients with surviving grafts. The preferred reporting guidelines for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines were applied. RESULTS: Five studies were left for inclusion, all retrospective in design, comprising 67 patients. The mean age was 40 years, the mean follow-up period was 61 months, and 68.2% of the patients treated were male. Eleven patients (16.4%) were treated with fascia lata autografts, and 56 patients (83.6%) were treated with Achilles tendon allografts. The graft survived in 53 patients (79.1%); the post-operative Mayo Elbow Performance Score averaged 69 points. Fourteen patients (20.9%) required revision surgery. In the setting of graft survival, 39.1% of patients had complications not requiring further surgical treatment and 5.7% of patients with surviving grafts needed subsequent operative treatment within the follow-up period. CONCLUSION: Given graft survival, this systematic review demonstrated satisfactory functional outcomes following interposition arthroplasty of the post-traumatic osteoarthritic elbow, however, associated with a cumulative complication and subsequent operative treatment rate of 44.8%. In addition, a revision rate of 20.9% needs to be expected. Varus-valgus instability in the pre-operative clinical assessment seems to be associated with unsatisfactory post-operative elbow function. The superiority of either of the two main reported graft methods (fascia lata autograft and Achilles tendon allograft) remains pending, and the role of an external fixator in preventing post-operative instability remains unresolved. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9556353 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95563532022-10-14 Interposition arthroplasty for post-traumatic osteoarthritis of the elbow: a systematic review Lanzerath, Fabian Hackl, Michael Pucher, Christoph-Johannes Leschinger, Tim Uschok, Stephan Müller, Lars P. Wegmann, Kilian Int Orthop Original Paper PURPOSE: Interposition arthroplasty for the post-traumatic osteoarthritic elbow is a salvage procedure used in young and active patients and remains a rare and unexplored therapeutic option. METHODS: We systematically reviewed the available literature searching electronic databases, MEDLINE using the PubMed interface and EMBASE. The primary objective was to synthesize functional outcomes and to investigate revision frequencies, but also complication and subsequent surgery rates among patients with surviving grafts. The preferred reporting guidelines for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines were applied. RESULTS: Five studies were left for inclusion, all retrospective in design, comprising 67 patients. The mean age was 40 years, the mean follow-up period was 61 months, and 68.2% of the patients treated were male. Eleven patients (16.4%) were treated with fascia lata autografts, and 56 patients (83.6%) were treated with Achilles tendon allografts. The graft survived in 53 patients (79.1%); the post-operative Mayo Elbow Performance Score averaged 69 points. Fourteen patients (20.9%) required revision surgery. In the setting of graft survival, 39.1% of patients had complications not requiring further surgical treatment and 5.7% of patients with surviving grafts needed subsequent operative treatment within the follow-up period. CONCLUSION: Given graft survival, this systematic review demonstrated satisfactory functional outcomes following interposition arthroplasty of the post-traumatic osteoarthritic elbow, however, associated with a cumulative complication and subsequent operative treatment rate of 44.8%. In addition, a revision rate of 20.9% needs to be expected. Varus-valgus instability in the pre-operative clinical assessment seems to be associated with unsatisfactory post-operative elbow function. The superiority of either of the two main reported graft methods (fascia lata autograft and Achilles tendon allograft) remains pending, and the role of an external fixator in preventing post-operative instability remains unresolved. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-08-30 2022-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9556353/ /pubmed/36042057 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00264-022-05562-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Lanzerath, Fabian Hackl, Michael Pucher, Christoph-Johannes Leschinger, Tim Uschok, Stephan Müller, Lars P. Wegmann, Kilian Interposition arthroplasty for post-traumatic osteoarthritis of the elbow: a systematic review |
title | Interposition arthroplasty for post-traumatic osteoarthritis of the elbow: a systematic review |
title_full | Interposition arthroplasty for post-traumatic osteoarthritis of the elbow: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Interposition arthroplasty for post-traumatic osteoarthritis of the elbow: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Interposition arthroplasty for post-traumatic osteoarthritis of the elbow: a systematic review |
title_short | Interposition arthroplasty for post-traumatic osteoarthritis of the elbow: a systematic review |
title_sort | interposition arthroplasty for post-traumatic osteoarthritis of the elbow: a systematic review |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9556353/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36042057 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00264-022-05562-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lanzerathfabian interpositionarthroplastyforposttraumaticosteoarthritisoftheelbowasystematicreview AT hacklmichael interpositionarthroplastyforposttraumaticosteoarthritisoftheelbowasystematicreview AT pucherchristophjohannes interpositionarthroplastyforposttraumaticosteoarthritisoftheelbowasystematicreview AT leschingertim interpositionarthroplastyforposttraumaticosteoarthritisoftheelbowasystematicreview AT uschokstephan interpositionarthroplastyforposttraumaticosteoarthritisoftheelbowasystematicreview AT mullerlarsp interpositionarthroplastyforposttraumaticosteoarthritisoftheelbowasystematicreview AT wegmannkilian interpositionarthroplastyforposttraumaticosteoarthritisoftheelbowasystematicreview |