Cargando…

Variations induced by body weight and background lesion normalization in standardized uptake value estimated by F18-FDG PET/CT

AIM: This work aims to study the impact of different SUV variants in terms of mean and maximum measures as well as various normalization methods with respect to body weight, body mass index, body surface area, and lean body mass in patients with lymphoma. METHODS: Sixty-nine patients (34 male–35 fem...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Badawe, Eman M., Abdel Gawad, Hesham, El-Nagdy, Mohamed S., Khalil, Magdy M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9556683/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36224438
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41824-022-00142-5
_version_ 1784807120645914624
author Badawe, Eman M.
Abdel Gawad, Hesham
El-Nagdy, Mohamed S.
Khalil, Magdy M.
author_facet Badawe, Eman M.
Abdel Gawad, Hesham
El-Nagdy, Mohamed S.
Khalil, Magdy M.
author_sort Badawe, Eman M.
collection PubMed
description AIM: This work aims to study the impact of different SUV variants in terms of mean and maximum measures as well as various normalization methods with respect to body weight, body mass index, body surface area, and lean body mass in patients with lymphoma. METHODS: Sixty-nine patients (34 male–35 female) were retrospectively selected. All patients had undergone F18-FDG PET/CT using the standard imaging protocol. In the first part of this study, SUVmean and SUVmax of patients’ lesions and three background sites including liver, aorta, and muscle were determined. Then, the normalization of lesion SUV to body weight and body background sites was performed. The ratio of lesion SUVmax to body background sites (muscle, aorta, and liver) SUVmax was determined in addition to the ratio of lesion SUVmean to body background sites SUVmean. The second part of the study included the calculations of the body mass index (BMI), body surface area (BSA), and lean body mass (LBM). The normalization of lesion, liver, aorta, and muscle SUV to BMI, BSA, and LBM was calculated and compared to each other. RESULTS: After performing the appropriate statistical calculations, the results showed that there is a significant difference in SUV measurements between the three background sites. Lesions normalized to the liver were significantly lower than those normalized to aorta and muscle and the results also showed a higher magnitude of lesions normalized to muscle in comparison to the aorta. The SUVmax and SUVmean normalized to different body weight indices showed the lowest variation with BSA and BMI while being increasingly higher with lean body mass using the two methods James and Janmahasatian, respectively, and then highest with body weight. CONCLUSION: The SUVmax and SUVmean showed lower variance in comparison to other background regions. Less variation was also remarkable in SUVmean normalized to BSA and Janma lean mass and also when SUVmax is normalized to James lean body mass. The SUVmax normalized to lean (i.e., James) as well as SUVmean normalized to lean (i.e., Janma) and BSA showed a significant independence with body weight.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9556683
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95566832022-10-14 Variations induced by body weight and background lesion normalization in standardized uptake value estimated by F18-FDG PET/CT Badawe, Eman M. Abdel Gawad, Hesham El-Nagdy, Mohamed S. Khalil, Magdy M. Eur J Hybrid Imaging Original Article AIM: This work aims to study the impact of different SUV variants in terms of mean and maximum measures as well as various normalization methods with respect to body weight, body mass index, body surface area, and lean body mass in patients with lymphoma. METHODS: Sixty-nine patients (34 male–35 female) were retrospectively selected. All patients had undergone F18-FDG PET/CT using the standard imaging protocol. In the first part of this study, SUVmean and SUVmax of patients’ lesions and three background sites including liver, aorta, and muscle were determined. Then, the normalization of lesion SUV to body weight and body background sites was performed. The ratio of lesion SUVmax to body background sites (muscle, aorta, and liver) SUVmax was determined in addition to the ratio of lesion SUVmean to body background sites SUVmean. The second part of the study included the calculations of the body mass index (BMI), body surface area (BSA), and lean body mass (LBM). The normalization of lesion, liver, aorta, and muscle SUV to BMI, BSA, and LBM was calculated and compared to each other. RESULTS: After performing the appropriate statistical calculations, the results showed that there is a significant difference in SUV measurements between the three background sites. Lesions normalized to the liver were significantly lower than those normalized to aorta and muscle and the results also showed a higher magnitude of lesions normalized to muscle in comparison to the aorta. The SUVmax and SUVmean normalized to different body weight indices showed the lowest variation with BSA and BMI while being increasingly higher with lean body mass using the two methods James and Janmahasatian, respectively, and then highest with body weight. CONCLUSION: The SUVmax and SUVmean showed lower variance in comparison to other background regions. Less variation was also remarkable in SUVmean normalized to BSA and Janma lean mass and also when SUVmax is normalized to James lean body mass. The SUVmax normalized to lean (i.e., James) as well as SUVmean normalized to lean (i.e., Janma) and BSA showed a significant independence with body weight. Springer International Publishing 2022-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9556683/ /pubmed/36224438 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41824-022-00142-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Badawe, Eman M.
Abdel Gawad, Hesham
El-Nagdy, Mohamed S.
Khalil, Magdy M.
Variations induced by body weight and background lesion normalization in standardized uptake value estimated by F18-FDG PET/CT
title Variations induced by body weight and background lesion normalization in standardized uptake value estimated by F18-FDG PET/CT
title_full Variations induced by body weight and background lesion normalization in standardized uptake value estimated by F18-FDG PET/CT
title_fullStr Variations induced by body weight and background lesion normalization in standardized uptake value estimated by F18-FDG PET/CT
title_full_unstemmed Variations induced by body weight and background lesion normalization in standardized uptake value estimated by F18-FDG PET/CT
title_short Variations induced by body weight and background lesion normalization in standardized uptake value estimated by F18-FDG PET/CT
title_sort variations induced by body weight and background lesion normalization in standardized uptake value estimated by f18-fdg pet/ct
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9556683/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36224438
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41824-022-00142-5
work_keys_str_mv AT badaweemanm variationsinducedbybodyweightandbackgroundlesionnormalizationinstandardizeduptakevalueestimatedbyf18fdgpetct
AT abdelgawadhesham variationsinducedbybodyweightandbackgroundlesionnormalizationinstandardizeduptakevalueestimatedbyf18fdgpetct
AT elnagdymohameds variationsinducedbybodyweightandbackgroundlesionnormalizationinstandardizeduptakevalueestimatedbyf18fdgpetct
AT khalilmagdym variationsinducedbybodyweightandbackgroundlesionnormalizationinstandardizeduptakevalueestimatedbyf18fdgpetct