Cargando…

Response of UK community hospitals to the COVID-19 pandemic: an appreciative inquiry

INTRODUCTION: The 500 community hospitals in the UK provide a range of services to their communities. The response of these small, mainly rural, hospitals to the COVID-19 pandemic has not yet been examined and so this study sought to address this gap. METHOD: Appreciative inquiry was used to underst...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Seamark, David Anthony, Prodger, Evelyn, Jay, Trish, Gibbard, Emma, Tucker, Helen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9556737/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36207053
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2022-001958
_version_ 1784807135913181184
author Seamark, David Anthony
Prodger, Evelyn
Jay, Trish
Gibbard, Emma
Tucker, Helen
author_facet Seamark, David Anthony
Prodger, Evelyn
Jay, Trish
Gibbard, Emma
Tucker, Helen
author_sort Seamark, David Anthony
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The 500 community hospitals in the UK provide a range of services to their communities. The response of these small, mainly rural, hospitals to the COVID-19 pandemic has not yet been examined and so this study sought to address this gap. METHOD: Appreciative inquiry was used to understand staff perspectives of how community hospitals responded to the COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic. A total of 20 organisations participated, representing 168 (34%) community hospitals in the UK. Qualitative interviews were conducted, with a total of 85 staff members, using an online video platform. 30 case studies were developed from these interviews. RESULTS: Staff described positive changes that were made in the context of the fear and uncertainty experienced in the pandemic. Quality improvements were reported in a wide range of services and models of care such as the use of the inpatient beds, and the access and management of urgent care services. Rapid changes were made in the way that services were managed, such as communications and leadership. Programmes of accelerated training were offered for existing and redeployed staff. Attention to staff health and well-being was a feature and there were a variety of innovations designed to support patients and their families. The impact of the changes was viewed as strengthening of integrated working between staff and sectors, the ability to rapidly innovate and improve quality, and the scope to use local decision-making to make changes. CONCLUSION: Staff of community hospitals described innovative and rapid quality improvements in their community hospitals in response to the pandemic. The case studies illustrated the features of community hospitals, showing that they can be resilient, flexible, responsive, creative, compassionate and integrated. The case studies of quality improvements are being used to encourage sharing and learning across community hospitals and beyond.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9556737
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95567372022-10-14 Response of UK community hospitals to the COVID-19 pandemic: an appreciative inquiry Seamark, David Anthony Prodger, Evelyn Jay, Trish Gibbard, Emma Tucker, Helen BMJ Open Qual Original Research INTRODUCTION: The 500 community hospitals in the UK provide a range of services to their communities. The response of these small, mainly rural, hospitals to the COVID-19 pandemic has not yet been examined and so this study sought to address this gap. METHOD: Appreciative inquiry was used to understand staff perspectives of how community hospitals responded to the COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic. A total of 20 organisations participated, representing 168 (34%) community hospitals in the UK. Qualitative interviews were conducted, with a total of 85 staff members, using an online video platform. 30 case studies were developed from these interviews. RESULTS: Staff described positive changes that were made in the context of the fear and uncertainty experienced in the pandemic. Quality improvements were reported in a wide range of services and models of care such as the use of the inpatient beds, and the access and management of urgent care services. Rapid changes were made in the way that services were managed, such as communications and leadership. Programmes of accelerated training were offered for existing and redeployed staff. Attention to staff health and well-being was a feature and there were a variety of innovations designed to support patients and their families. The impact of the changes was viewed as strengthening of integrated working between staff and sectors, the ability to rapidly innovate and improve quality, and the scope to use local decision-making to make changes. CONCLUSION: Staff of community hospitals described innovative and rapid quality improvements in their community hospitals in response to the pandemic. The case studies illustrated the features of community hospitals, showing that they can be resilient, flexible, responsive, creative, compassionate and integrated. The case studies of quality improvements are being used to encourage sharing and learning across community hospitals and beyond. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-10-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9556737/ /pubmed/36207053 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2022-001958 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Seamark, David Anthony
Prodger, Evelyn
Jay, Trish
Gibbard, Emma
Tucker, Helen
Response of UK community hospitals to the COVID-19 pandemic: an appreciative inquiry
title Response of UK community hospitals to the COVID-19 pandemic: an appreciative inquiry
title_full Response of UK community hospitals to the COVID-19 pandemic: an appreciative inquiry
title_fullStr Response of UK community hospitals to the COVID-19 pandemic: an appreciative inquiry
title_full_unstemmed Response of UK community hospitals to the COVID-19 pandemic: an appreciative inquiry
title_short Response of UK community hospitals to the COVID-19 pandemic: an appreciative inquiry
title_sort response of uk community hospitals to the covid-19 pandemic: an appreciative inquiry
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9556737/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36207053
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2022-001958
work_keys_str_mv AT seamarkdavidanthony responseofukcommunityhospitalstothecovid19pandemicanappreciativeinquiry
AT prodgerevelyn responseofukcommunityhospitalstothecovid19pandemicanappreciativeinquiry
AT jaytrish responseofukcommunityhospitalstothecovid19pandemicanappreciativeinquiry
AT gibbardemma responseofukcommunityhospitalstothecovid19pandemicanappreciativeinquiry
AT tuckerhelen responseofukcommunityhospitalstothecovid19pandemicanappreciativeinquiry