Cargando…
Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of mesenchymal stromal cells to treat coronavirus disease 2019: is it too late?
BACKGROUND AIMS: Evidence regarding the extent that mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) may improve clinical outcomes in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been limited by marked inter-study heterogeneity, inconsistent product characterization and appreciable risk of bias (RoB). Give...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
International Society for Cell & Gene Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9556962/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36333234 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcyt.2022.10.003 |
_version_ | 1784807193771507712 |
---|---|
author | Kirkham, Aidan M. Bailey, Adrian J.M. Shorr, Risa Lalu, Manoj M. Fergusson, Dean A. Allan, David S. |
author_facet | Kirkham, Aidan M. Bailey, Adrian J.M. Shorr, Risa Lalu, Manoj M. Fergusson, Dean A. Allan, David S. |
author_sort | Kirkham, Aidan M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AIMS: Evidence regarding the extent that mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) may improve clinical outcomes in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been limited by marked inter-study heterogeneity, inconsistent product characterization and appreciable risk of bias (RoB). Given the evolution of treatment options and trajectory of the pandemic, an updated analysis of high-quality evidence from randomized controlled trials is needed for a timely and conclusive understanding of the effectiveness of MSCs. METHODS: A systematic literature search through March 30, 2022, identified all English language, full-text randomized controlled trials examining the use of MSCs in the treatment of COVID-19. RESULTS: Eight studies were identified (316 patients, 165 administered MSCs and 151 controls). Controls evolved significantly over time with a broad range of comparison treatments. All studies reported mortality at study endpoint. Random effects meta-analysis revealed that MSCs decreased relative risk of death (risk ratio, 0.63, 95% confidence interval, 0.42–0.94, P = 0.02, I(2) = 14%) with no significant difference in absolute risk of death. MSCs decreased length of hospital stay and C-reactive protein levels and increased odds of clinical improvement at study endpoint compared with controls. Rates of adverse events and severe adverse events were similar between MSC and control groups. Only two (25%) studies reported all four International Society for Cell & Gene Therapy criteria for MSC characterization. Included studies had low (n = 7) or some (n = 1) concerns regarding RoB. CONCLUSIONS: MSCs may reduce risk of death in patients with severe or critical COVID-19 and improve secondary clinical outcomes. Variable outcome reporting, inconsistent product characterization and variable control group treatments remain barriers to higher-quality evidence and may constrain clinical usage. A master protocol is proposed and appears necessary for accelerated translation of higher-quality evidence for future applications of MSC therapy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9556962 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | International Society for Cell & Gene Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95569622022-10-16 Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of mesenchymal stromal cells to treat coronavirus disease 2019: is it too late? Kirkham, Aidan M. Bailey, Adrian J.M. Shorr, Risa Lalu, Manoj M. Fergusson, Dean A. Allan, David S. Cytotherapy Full-Length Article BACKGROUND AIMS: Evidence regarding the extent that mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) may improve clinical outcomes in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been limited by marked inter-study heterogeneity, inconsistent product characterization and appreciable risk of bias (RoB). Given the evolution of treatment options and trajectory of the pandemic, an updated analysis of high-quality evidence from randomized controlled trials is needed for a timely and conclusive understanding of the effectiveness of MSCs. METHODS: A systematic literature search through March 30, 2022, identified all English language, full-text randomized controlled trials examining the use of MSCs in the treatment of COVID-19. RESULTS: Eight studies were identified (316 patients, 165 administered MSCs and 151 controls). Controls evolved significantly over time with a broad range of comparison treatments. All studies reported mortality at study endpoint. Random effects meta-analysis revealed that MSCs decreased relative risk of death (risk ratio, 0.63, 95% confidence interval, 0.42–0.94, P = 0.02, I(2) = 14%) with no significant difference in absolute risk of death. MSCs decreased length of hospital stay and C-reactive protein levels and increased odds of clinical improvement at study endpoint compared with controls. Rates of adverse events and severe adverse events were similar between MSC and control groups. Only two (25%) studies reported all four International Society for Cell & Gene Therapy criteria for MSC characterization. Included studies had low (n = 7) or some (n = 1) concerns regarding RoB. CONCLUSIONS: MSCs may reduce risk of death in patients with severe or critical COVID-19 and improve secondary clinical outcomes. Variable outcome reporting, inconsistent product characterization and variable control group treatments remain barriers to higher-quality evidence and may constrain clinical usage. A master protocol is proposed and appears necessary for accelerated translation of higher-quality evidence for future applications of MSC therapy. International Society for Cell & Gene Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. 2023-03 2022-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9556962/ /pubmed/36333234 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcyt.2022.10.003 Text en © 2022 International Society for Cell & Gene Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Full-Length Article Kirkham, Aidan M. Bailey, Adrian J.M. Shorr, Risa Lalu, Manoj M. Fergusson, Dean A. Allan, David S. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of mesenchymal stromal cells to treat coronavirus disease 2019: is it too late? |
title | Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of mesenchymal stromal cells to treat coronavirus disease 2019: is it too late? |
title_full | Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of mesenchymal stromal cells to treat coronavirus disease 2019: is it too late? |
title_fullStr | Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of mesenchymal stromal cells to treat coronavirus disease 2019: is it too late? |
title_full_unstemmed | Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of mesenchymal stromal cells to treat coronavirus disease 2019: is it too late? |
title_short | Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of mesenchymal stromal cells to treat coronavirus disease 2019: is it too late? |
title_sort | systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of mesenchymal stromal cells to treat coronavirus disease 2019: is it too late? |
topic | Full-Length Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9556962/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36333234 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcyt.2022.10.003 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kirkhamaidanm systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsofmesenchymalstromalcellstotreatcoronavirusdisease2019isittoolate AT baileyadrianjm systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsofmesenchymalstromalcellstotreatcoronavirusdisease2019isittoolate AT shorrrisa systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsofmesenchymalstromalcellstotreatcoronavirusdisease2019isittoolate AT lalumanojm systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsofmesenchymalstromalcellstotreatcoronavirusdisease2019isittoolate AT fergussondeana systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsofmesenchymalstromalcellstotreatcoronavirusdisease2019isittoolate AT allandavids systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrialsofmesenchymalstromalcellstotreatcoronavirusdisease2019isittoolate |