Cargando…
The effects of different stress on intestinal mucosal barrier and intestinal microecology were discussed based on three typical animal models
Recent studies have revealed that the effect of intestinal microecological disorders on organismal physiology is not limited to the digestive system, which provides new perspectives for microecological studies and new ideas for clinical diagnosis and prevention of microecology-related diseases. Stre...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9557054/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36250050 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2022.953474 |
_version_ | 1784807216193208320 |
---|---|
author | Guo, Junfeng Lou, Xiaokun Gong, Wenyan Bian, Jing Liao, Yuhan Wu, Qi Jiao, Qibin Zhang, Xingwei |
author_facet | Guo, Junfeng Lou, Xiaokun Gong, Wenyan Bian, Jing Liao, Yuhan Wu, Qi Jiao, Qibin Zhang, Xingwei |
author_sort | Guo, Junfeng |
collection | PubMed |
description | Recent studies have revealed that the effect of intestinal microecological disorders on organismal physiology is not limited to the digestive system, which provides new perspectives for microecological studies and new ideas for clinical diagnosis and prevention of microecology-related diseases. Stress triggers impairment of intestinal mucosal barrier function, which could be duplicated by animal models. In this paper, pathological animal models with high prevalence and typical stressors—corresponding to three major stressors of external environmental factors, internal environmental factors, and social psychological factors, respectively exemplified by burns, intestinal ischemia-reperfusion injury (IIRI), and depression models—were selected. We summarized the construction and evaluation of these typical animal models and the effects of stress on the organism and intestinal barrier, as well as systematically discussed the effects of different stresses on the intestinal mucosal barrier and intestinal microecology. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9557054 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95570542022-10-14 The effects of different stress on intestinal mucosal barrier and intestinal microecology were discussed based on three typical animal models Guo, Junfeng Lou, Xiaokun Gong, Wenyan Bian, Jing Liao, Yuhan Wu, Qi Jiao, Qibin Zhang, Xingwei Front Cell Infect Microbiol Cellular and Infection Microbiology Recent studies have revealed that the effect of intestinal microecological disorders on organismal physiology is not limited to the digestive system, which provides new perspectives for microecological studies and new ideas for clinical diagnosis and prevention of microecology-related diseases. Stress triggers impairment of intestinal mucosal barrier function, which could be duplicated by animal models. In this paper, pathological animal models with high prevalence and typical stressors—corresponding to three major stressors of external environmental factors, internal environmental factors, and social psychological factors, respectively exemplified by burns, intestinal ischemia-reperfusion injury (IIRI), and depression models—were selected. We summarized the construction and evaluation of these typical animal models and the effects of stress on the organism and intestinal barrier, as well as systematically discussed the effects of different stresses on the intestinal mucosal barrier and intestinal microecology. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9557054/ /pubmed/36250050 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2022.953474 Text en Copyright © 2022 Guo, Lou, Gong, Bian, Liao, Wu, Jiao and Zhang https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Cellular and Infection Microbiology Guo, Junfeng Lou, Xiaokun Gong, Wenyan Bian, Jing Liao, Yuhan Wu, Qi Jiao, Qibin Zhang, Xingwei The effects of different stress on intestinal mucosal barrier and intestinal microecology were discussed based on three typical animal models |
title | The effects of different stress on intestinal mucosal barrier and intestinal microecology were discussed based on three typical animal models |
title_full | The effects of different stress on intestinal mucosal barrier and intestinal microecology were discussed based on three typical animal models |
title_fullStr | The effects of different stress on intestinal mucosal barrier and intestinal microecology were discussed based on three typical animal models |
title_full_unstemmed | The effects of different stress on intestinal mucosal barrier and intestinal microecology were discussed based on three typical animal models |
title_short | The effects of different stress on intestinal mucosal barrier and intestinal microecology were discussed based on three typical animal models |
title_sort | effects of different stress on intestinal mucosal barrier and intestinal microecology were discussed based on three typical animal models |
topic | Cellular and Infection Microbiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9557054/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36250050 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcimb.2022.953474 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT guojunfeng theeffectsofdifferentstressonintestinalmucosalbarrierandintestinalmicroecologywerediscussedbasedonthreetypicalanimalmodels AT louxiaokun theeffectsofdifferentstressonintestinalmucosalbarrierandintestinalmicroecologywerediscussedbasedonthreetypicalanimalmodels AT gongwenyan theeffectsofdifferentstressonintestinalmucosalbarrierandintestinalmicroecologywerediscussedbasedonthreetypicalanimalmodels AT bianjing theeffectsofdifferentstressonintestinalmucosalbarrierandintestinalmicroecologywerediscussedbasedonthreetypicalanimalmodels AT liaoyuhan theeffectsofdifferentstressonintestinalmucosalbarrierandintestinalmicroecologywerediscussedbasedonthreetypicalanimalmodels AT wuqi theeffectsofdifferentstressonintestinalmucosalbarrierandintestinalmicroecologywerediscussedbasedonthreetypicalanimalmodels AT jiaoqibin theeffectsofdifferentstressonintestinalmucosalbarrierandintestinalmicroecologywerediscussedbasedonthreetypicalanimalmodels AT zhangxingwei theeffectsofdifferentstressonintestinalmucosalbarrierandintestinalmicroecologywerediscussedbasedonthreetypicalanimalmodels AT guojunfeng effectsofdifferentstressonintestinalmucosalbarrierandintestinalmicroecologywerediscussedbasedonthreetypicalanimalmodels AT louxiaokun effectsofdifferentstressonintestinalmucosalbarrierandintestinalmicroecologywerediscussedbasedonthreetypicalanimalmodels AT gongwenyan effectsofdifferentstressonintestinalmucosalbarrierandintestinalmicroecologywerediscussedbasedonthreetypicalanimalmodels AT bianjing effectsofdifferentstressonintestinalmucosalbarrierandintestinalmicroecologywerediscussedbasedonthreetypicalanimalmodels AT liaoyuhan effectsofdifferentstressonintestinalmucosalbarrierandintestinalmicroecologywerediscussedbasedonthreetypicalanimalmodels AT wuqi effectsofdifferentstressonintestinalmucosalbarrierandintestinalmicroecologywerediscussedbasedonthreetypicalanimalmodels AT jiaoqibin effectsofdifferentstressonintestinalmucosalbarrierandintestinalmicroecologywerediscussedbasedonthreetypicalanimalmodels AT zhangxingwei effectsofdifferentstressonintestinalmucosalbarrierandintestinalmicroecologywerediscussedbasedonthreetypicalanimalmodels |