Cargando…

Randomised controlled trials in hand surgery: a scoping review

OBJECTIVES: To identify the evidence gaps that exist regarding the efficacy or effectiveness of hand surgery. SETTING: A scoping review. We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase and CENTRAL databases to identify all hand surgical randomised controlled trials from inception to 7 November 2020. RESU...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Heikkinen, Juuso, Das De, Soumen, Jokihaara, Jarkko, Jaatinen, Kati, Buchbinder, Rachelle, Karjalainen, Teemu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9557326/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36216426
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062773
_version_ 1784807279963406336
author Heikkinen, Juuso
Das De, Soumen
Jokihaara, Jarkko
Jaatinen, Kati
Buchbinder, Rachelle
Karjalainen, Teemu
author_facet Heikkinen, Juuso
Das De, Soumen
Jokihaara, Jarkko
Jaatinen, Kati
Buchbinder, Rachelle
Karjalainen, Teemu
author_sort Heikkinen, Juuso
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To identify the evidence gaps that exist regarding the efficacy or effectiveness of hand surgery. SETTING: A scoping review. We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase and CENTRAL databases to identify all hand surgical randomised controlled trials from inception to 7 November 2020. RESULTS: Of the 220 identified randomised controlled trials, none were fundamental efficacy trials, that is, compared surgery with placebo surgery. 172 (78%) trials compared the outcomes of different surgical techniques, and 143 (65%) trials were trauma related. We identified only 47 (21%) trials comparing surgery with non-operative care or injection. CONCLUSION: The evidence supporting use of surgery especially for chronic hand conditions is scarce. To determine optimal care for people with hand conditions, more resources should be aimed at placebo-controlled trials and pragmatic effectiveness trials comparing hand surgery with non-operative care. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019122710.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9557326
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95573262022-10-14 Randomised controlled trials in hand surgery: a scoping review Heikkinen, Juuso Das De, Soumen Jokihaara, Jarkko Jaatinen, Kati Buchbinder, Rachelle Karjalainen, Teemu BMJ Open Evidence Based Practice OBJECTIVES: To identify the evidence gaps that exist regarding the efficacy or effectiveness of hand surgery. SETTING: A scoping review. We systematically searched MEDLINE, Embase and CENTRAL databases to identify all hand surgical randomised controlled trials from inception to 7 November 2020. RESULTS: Of the 220 identified randomised controlled trials, none were fundamental efficacy trials, that is, compared surgery with placebo surgery. 172 (78%) trials compared the outcomes of different surgical techniques, and 143 (65%) trials were trauma related. We identified only 47 (21%) trials comparing surgery with non-operative care or injection. CONCLUSION: The evidence supporting use of surgery especially for chronic hand conditions is scarce. To determine optimal care for people with hand conditions, more resources should be aimed at placebo-controlled trials and pragmatic effectiveness trials comparing hand surgery with non-operative care. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019122710. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-10-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9557326/ /pubmed/36216426 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062773 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Evidence Based Practice
Heikkinen, Juuso
Das De, Soumen
Jokihaara, Jarkko
Jaatinen, Kati
Buchbinder, Rachelle
Karjalainen, Teemu
Randomised controlled trials in hand surgery: a scoping review
title Randomised controlled trials in hand surgery: a scoping review
title_full Randomised controlled trials in hand surgery: a scoping review
title_fullStr Randomised controlled trials in hand surgery: a scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Randomised controlled trials in hand surgery: a scoping review
title_short Randomised controlled trials in hand surgery: a scoping review
title_sort randomised controlled trials in hand surgery: a scoping review
topic Evidence Based Practice
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9557326/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36216426
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062773
work_keys_str_mv AT heikkinenjuuso randomisedcontrolledtrialsinhandsurgeryascopingreview
AT dasdesoumen randomisedcontrolledtrialsinhandsurgeryascopingreview
AT jokihaarajarkko randomisedcontrolledtrialsinhandsurgeryascopingreview
AT jaatinenkati randomisedcontrolledtrialsinhandsurgeryascopingreview
AT buchbinderrachelle randomisedcontrolledtrialsinhandsurgeryascopingreview
AT karjalainenteemu randomisedcontrolledtrialsinhandsurgeryascopingreview