Cargando…
Organizational responses to the COVID-19 pandemic in Victoria, Australia: A qualitative study across four healthcare settings
OBJECTIVE: Organizational responses that support healthcare workers (HCWs) and mitigate health risks are necessary to offset the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. We aimed to understand how HCWs and key personnel working in healthcare settings in Melbourne, Australia perceived their employing organiz...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9557753/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36249244 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.965664 |
_version_ | 1784807295136301056 |
---|---|
author | McGuinness, Sarah L. Josphin, Johnson Eades, Owen Clifford, Sharon Fisher, Jane Kirkman, Maggie Russell, Grant Hodgson, Carol L. Kelsall, Helen L. Lane, Riki Skouteris, Helen Smith, Karen L. Leder, Karin |
author_facet | McGuinness, Sarah L. Josphin, Johnson Eades, Owen Clifford, Sharon Fisher, Jane Kirkman, Maggie Russell, Grant Hodgson, Carol L. Kelsall, Helen L. Lane, Riki Skouteris, Helen Smith, Karen L. Leder, Karin |
author_sort | McGuinness, Sarah L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Organizational responses that support healthcare workers (HCWs) and mitigate health risks are necessary to offset the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. We aimed to understand how HCWs and key personnel working in healthcare settings in Melbourne, Australia perceived their employing organizations' responses to the COVID-19 pandemic. METHOD: In this qualitative study, conducted May-July 2021 as part of the longitudinal Coronavirus in Victorian Healthcare and Aged Care Workers (COVIC-HA) study, we purposively sampled and interviewed HCWs and key personnel from healthcare organizations across hospital, ambulance, aged care and primary care (general practice) settings. We also examined HCWs' free-text responses to a question about organizational resources and/or supports from the COVIC-HA Study's baseline survey. We thematically analyzed data using an iterative process. RESULTS: We analyzed data from interviews with 28 HCWs and 21 key personnel and free-text responses from 365 HCWs, yielding three major themes: navigating a changing and uncertain environment, maintaining service delivery during a pandemic, and meeting the safety and psychological needs of staff . HCWs valued organizational efforts to engage openly and honesty with staff, and proactive responses such as strategies to enhance workplace safety (e.g., personal protective equipment spotters). Suggestions for improvement identified in the themes included streamlined information processes, greater involvement of HCWs in decision-making, increased investment in staff wellbeing initiatives and sustainable approaches to strengthen the healthcare workforce. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides in-depth insights into the challenges and successes of organizational responses across four healthcare settings in the uncertain environment of a pandemic. Future efforts to mitigate the impact of acute stressors on HCWs should include a strong focus on bidirectional communication, effective and realistic strategies to strengthen and sustain the healthcare workforce, and greater investment in flexible and meaningful psychological support and wellbeing initiatives for HCWs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9557753 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95577532022-10-14 Organizational responses to the COVID-19 pandemic in Victoria, Australia: A qualitative study across four healthcare settings McGuinness, Sarah L. Josphin, Johnson Eades, Owen Clifford, Sharon Fisher, Jane Kirkman, Maggie Russell, Grant Hodgson, Carol L. Kelsall, Helen L. Lane, Riki Skouteris, Helen Smith, Karen L. Leder, Karin Front Public Health Public Health OBJECTIVE: Organizational responses that support healthcare workers (HCWs) and mitigate health risks are necessary to offset the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. We aimed to understand how HCWs and key personnel working in healthcare settings in Melbourne, Australia perceived their employing organizations' responses to the COVID-19 pandemic. METHOD: In this qualitative study, conducted May-July 2021 as part of the longitudinal Coronavirus in Victorian Healthcare and Aged Care Workers (COVIC-HA) study, we purposively sampled and interviewed HCWs and key personnel from healthcare organizations across hospital, ambulance, aged care and primary care (general practice) settings. We also examined HCWs' free-text responses to a question about organizational resources and/or supports from the COVIC-HA Study's baseline survey. We thematically analyzed data using an iterative process. RESULTS: We analyzed data from interviews with 28 HCWs and 21 key personnel and free-text responses from 365 HCWs, yielding three major themes: navigating a changing and uncertain environment, maintaining service delivery during a pandemic, and meeting the safety and psychological needs of staff . HCWs valued organizational efforts to engage openly and honesty with staff, and proactive responses such as strategies to enhance workplace safety (e.g., personal protective equipment spotters). Suggestions for improvement identified in the themes included streamlined information processes, greater involvement of HCWs in decision-making, increased investment in staff wellbeing initiatives and sustainable approaches to strengthen the healthcare workforce. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides in-depth insights into the challenges and successes of organizational responses across four healthcare settings in the uncertain environment of a pandemic. Future efforts to mitigate the impact of acute stressors on HCWs should include a strong focus on bidirectional communication, effective and realistic strategies to strengthen and sustain the healthcare workforce, and greater investment in flexible and meaningful psychological support and wellbeing initiatives for HCWs. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-09-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9557753/ /pubmed/36249244 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.965664 Text en Copyright © 2022 McGuinness, Josphin, Eades, Clifford, Fisher, Kirkman, Russell, Hodgson, Kelsall, Lane, Skouteris, Smith and Leder. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Public Health McGuinness, Sarah L. Josphin, Johnson Eades, Owen Clifford, Sharon Fisher, Jane Kirkman, Maggie Russell, Grant Hodgson, Carol L. Kelsall, Helen L. Lane, Riki Skouteris, Helen Smith, Karen L. Leder, Karin Organizational responses to the COVID-19 pandemic in Victoria, Australia: A qualitative study across four healthcare settings |
title | Organizational responses to the COVID-19 pandemic in Victoria, Australia: A qualitative study across four healthcare settings |
title_full | Organizational responses to the COVID-19 pandemic in Victoria, Australia: A qualitative study across four healthcare settings |
title_fullStr | Organizational responses to the COVID-19 pandemic in Victoria, Australia: A qualitative study across four healthcare settings |
title_full_unstemmed | Organizational responses to the COVID-19 pandemic in Victoria, Australia: A qualitative study across four healthcare settings |
title_short | Organizational responses to the COVID-19 pandemic in Victoria, Australia: A qualitative study across four healthcare settings |
title_sort | organizational responses to the covid-19 pandemic in victoria, australia: a qualitative study across four healthcare settings |
topic | Public Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9557753/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36249244 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.965664 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mcguinnesssarahl organizationalresponsestothecovid19pandemicinvictoriaaustraliaaqualitativestudyacrossfourhealthcaresettings AT josphinjohnson organizationalresponsestothecovid19pandemicinvictoriaaustraliaaqualitativestudyacrossfourhealthcaresettings AT eadesowen organizationalresponsestothecovid19pandemicinvictoriaaustraliaaqualitativestudyacrossfourhealthcaresettings AT cliffordsharon organizationalresponsestothecovid19pandemicinvictoriaaustraliaaqualitativestudyacrossfourhealthcaresettings AT fisherjane organizationalresponsestothecovid19pandemicinvictoriaaustraliaaqualitativestudyacrossfourhealthcaresettings AT kirkmanmaggie organizationalresponsestothecovid19pandemicinvictoriaaustraliaaqualitativestudyacrossfourhealthcaresettings AT russellgrant organizationalresponsestothecovid19pandemicinvictoriaaustraliaaqualitativestudyacrossfourhealthcaresettings AT hodgsoncaroll organizationalresponsestothecovid19pandemicinvictoriaaustraliaaqualitativestudyacrossfourhealthcaresettings AT kelsallhelenl organizationalresponsestothecovid19pandemicinvictoriaaustraliaaqualitativestudyacrossfourhealthcaresettings AT laneriki organizationalresponsestothecovid19pandemicinvictoriaaustraliaaqualitativestudyacrossfourhealthcaresettings AT skouterishelen organizationalresponsestothecovid19pandemicinvictoriaaustraliaaqualitativestudyacrossfourhealthcaresettings AT smithkarenl organizationalresponsestothecovid19pandemicinvictoriaaustraliaaqualitativestudyacrossfourhealthcaresettings AT lederkarin organizationalresponsestothecovid19pandemicinvictoriaaustraliaaqualitativestudyacrossfourhealthcaresettings |