Cargando…

Health Information Sourcing and Health Knowledge Quality: Repeated Cross-sectional Survey

BACKGROUND: People’s health-related knowledge influences health outcomes, as this knowledge may influence whether individuals follow advice from their doctors or public health agencies. Yet, little attention has been paid to where people obtain health information and how these information sources re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Korshakova, Elena, Marsh, Jessecae K, Kleinberg, Samantha
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9557754/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35998198
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/39274
_version_ 1784807295390056448
author Korshakova, Elena
Marsh, Jessecae K
Kleinberg, Samantha
author_facet Korshakova, Elena
Marsh, Jessecae K
Kleinberg, Samantha
author_sort Korshakova, Elena
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: People’s health-related knowledge influences health outcomes, as this knowledge may influence whether individuals follow advice from their doctors or public health agencies. Yet, little attention has been paid to where people obtain health information and how these information sources relate to the quality of knowledge. OBJECTIVE: We aim to discover what information sources people use to learn about health conditions, how these sources relate to the quality of their health knowledge, and how both the number of information sources and health knowledge change over time. METHODS: We surveyed 200 different individuals at 12 time points from March through September 2020. At each time point, we elicited participants’ knowledge about causes, risk factors, and preventative interventions for 8 viral (Ebola, common cold, COVID-19, Zika) and nonviral (food allergies, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis [ALS], strep throat, stroke) illnesses. Participants were further asked how they learned about each illness and to rate how much they trust various sources of health information. RESULTS: We found that participants used different information sources to obtain health information about common illnesses (food allergies, strep throat, stroke) compared to emerging illnesses (Ebola, common cold, COVID-19, Zika). Participants relied mainly on news media, government agencies, and social media for information about emerging illnesses, while learning about common illnesses from family, friends, and medical professionals. Participants relied on social media for information about COVID-19, with their knowledge accuracy of COVID-19 declining over the course of the pandemic. The number of information sources participants used was positively correlated with health knowledge quality, though there was no relationship with the specific source types consulted. CONCLUSIONS: Building on prior work on health information seeking and factors affecting health knowledge, we now find that people systematically consult different types of information sources by illness type and that the number of information sources people use affects the quality of individuals’ health knowledge. Interventions to disseminate health information may need to be targeted to where individuals are likely to seek out information, and these information sources differ systematically by illness type.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9557754
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95577542022-10-14 Health Information Sourcing and Health Knowledge Quality: Repeated Cross-sectional Survey Korshakova, Elena Marsh, Jessecae K Kleinberg, Samantha JMIR Form Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: People’s health-related knowledge influences health outcomes, as this knowledge may influence whether individuals follow advice from their doctors or public health agencies. Yet, little attention has been paid to where people obtain health information and how these information sources relate to the quality of knowledge. OBJECTIVE: We aim to discover what information sources people use to learn about health conditions, how these sources relate to the quality of their health knowledge, and how both the number of information sources and health knowledge change over time. METHODS: We surveyed 200 different individuals at 12 time points from March through September 2020. At each time point, we elicited participants’ knowledge about causes, risk factors, and preventative interventions for 8 viral (Ebola, common cold, COVID-19, Zika) and nonviral (food allergies, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis [ALS], strep throat, stroke) illnesses. Participants were further asked how they learned about each illness and to rate how much they trust various sources of health information. RESULTS: We found that participants used different information sources to obtain health information about common illnesses (food allergies, strep throat, stroke) compared to emerging illnesses (Ebola, common cold, COVID-19, Zika). Participants relied mainly on news media, government agencies, and social media for information about emerging illnesses, while learning about common illnesses from family, friends, and medical professionals. Participants relied on social media for information about COVID-19, with their knowledge accuracy of COVID-19 declining over the course of the pandemic. The number of information sources participants used was positively correlated with health knowledge quality, though there was no relationship with the specific source types consulted. CONCLUSIONS: Building on prior work on health information seeking and factors affecting health knowledge, we now find that people systematically consult different types of information sources by illness type and that the number of information sources people use affects the quality of individuals’ health knowledge. Interventions to disseminate health information may need to be targeted to where individuals are likely to seek out information, and these information sources differ systematically by illness type. JMIR Publications 2022-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9557754/ /pubmed/35998198 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/39274 Text en ©Elena Korshakova, Jessecae K Marsh, Samantha Kleinberg. Originally published in JMIR Formative Research (https://formative.jmir.org), 28.09.2022. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Formative Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://formative.jmir.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Korshakova, Elena
Marsh, Jessecae K
Kleinberg, Samantha
Health Information Sourcing and Health Knowledge Quality: Repeated Cross-sectional Survey
title Health Information Sourcing and Health Knowledge Quality: Repeated Cross-sectional Survey
title_full Health Information Sourcing and Health Knowledge Quality: Repeated Cross-sectional Survey
title_fullStr Health Information Sourcing and Health Knowledge Quality: Repeated Cross-sectional Survey
title_full_unstemmed Health Information Sourcing and Health Knowledge Quality: Repeated Cross-sectional Survey
title_short Health Information Sourcing and Health Knowledge Quality: Repeated Cross-sectional Survey
title_sort health information sourcing and health knowledge quality: repeated cross-sectional survey
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9557754/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35998198
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/39274
work_keys_str_mv AT korshakovaelena healthinformationsourcingandhealthknowledgequalityrepeatedcrosssectionalsurvey
AT marshjessecaek healthinformationsourcingandhealthknowledgequalityrepeatedcrosssectionalsurvey
AT kleinbergsamantha healthinformationsourcingandhealthknowledgequalityrepeatedcrosssectionalsurvey