Cargando…

The Indirect Effects of a Mindfulness Mobile App on Productivity Through Changes in Sleep Among Retail Employees: Secondary Analysis

BACKGROUND: Chronic sleep disturbance is prevalent among United States employees and associated with costly productivity impairment. Mindfulness interventions improve sleep (ie, insomnia and daytime sleepiness) and productivity outcomes, and mobile apps provide scalable means of intervention deliver...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Espel-Huynh, Hallie, Baldwin, Matthew, Puzia, Megan, Huberty, Jennifer
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9557984/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36169994
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/40500
_version_ 1784807349266939904
author Espel-Huynh, Hallie
Baldwin, Matthew
Puzia, Megan
Huberty, Jennifer
author_facet Espel-Huynh, Hallie
Baldwin, Matthew
Puzia, Megan
Huberty, Jennifer
author_sort Espel-Huynh, Hallie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Chronic sleep disturbance is prevalent among United States employees and associated with costly productivity impairment. Mindfulness interventions improve sleep (ie, insomnia and daytime sleepiness) and productivity outcomes, and mobile apps provide scalable means of intervention delivery. However, few studies have examined the effects of mindfulness mobile apps on employees, and no research to date has tested the role of sleep improvement as a potential mechanism of action for productivity outcomes. OBJECTIVE: This study examined the effects of Calm, a consumer-based mindfulness app, and sleep coaching, on productivity impairment among retail employees through the indirect effects of changes in insomnia and daytime sleepiness. METHODS: This study was a secondary analysis of data from a randomized controlled trial (N=1029) comparing the use of Calm (n=585, 56.9%) to a waitlist control (n=444, 43.2%) for 8 weeks among employees of a large retail employer in the United States. A subset of individuals with elevated insomnia symptoms also had access to brief sleep coaching with Calm (n=101, 9.8%). Insomnia symptom severity, daytime sleepiness, and productivity impairment (ie, absenteeism, presenteeism, overall productivity impairment, and non–work activity impairment) were assessed at baseline and weeks 2, 4, 6, and 8. Indirect effects were evaluated with latent growth curve modeling to test whether the Calm intervention (Calm group vs waitlist control) was effective in reducing work productivity impairment through changes in sleep disturbance. RESULTS: No significant main effects of Calm intervention on productivity impairment were detected for any outcome at α level of .05, with the exception of non–work activity impairment models, in which Calm intervention reduced non–work activity impairment over time (P=.01 and P=.02 for insomnia and sleepiness models, respectively). Significant indirect effects of insomnia were detected for presenteeism (P=.002), overall work productivity (P=.01), and non–work activity impairment (P=.002); Calm intervention produced significantly greater reductions in insomnia symptoms (relative to waitlist control), and decreases in insomnia were associated with decreases in work productivity impairment. There was no significant indirect effect of change in insomnia on changes in absenteeism (P=.20). Furthermore, we detected no significant indirect effects of daytime sleepiness on productivity impairment. CONCLUSIONS: We found that Calm (plus sleep coaching for a small subset of individuals) had beneficial effects on employee sleep, and these benefits on sleep were related to indirect effects on productivity impairment (ie, presenteeism, overall work productivity impairment, and non–work activity impairment). There were no overall main effects of Calm intervention on productivity impairment; however, insomnia appears to be a mechanism associated with benefits for employee productivity. This is one of the first studies to suggest that sleep benefits of a mindfulness mobile app may also indirectly relate to benefits for workplace productivity. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05120310; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05120310
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9557984
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95579842022-10-14 The Indirect Effects of a Mindfulness Mobile App on Productivity Through Changes in Sleep Among Retail Employees: Secondary Analysis Espel-Huynh, Hallie Baldwin, Matthew Puzia, Megan Huberty, Jennifer JMIR Mhealth Uhealth Original Paper BACKGROUND: Chronic sleep disturbance is prevalent among United States employees and associated with costly productivity impairment. Mindfulness interventions improve sleep (ie, insomnia and daytime sleepiness) and productivity outcomes, and mobile apps provide scalable means of intervention delivery. However, few studies have examined the effects of mindfulness mobile apps on employees, and no research to date has tested the role of sleep improvement as a potential mechanism of action for productivity outcomes. OBJECTIVE: This study examined the effects of Calm, a consumer-based mindfulness app, and sleep coaching, on productivity impairment among retail employees through the indirect effects of changes in insomnia and daytime sleepiness. METHODS: This study was a secondary analysis of data from a randomized controlled trial (N=1029) comparing the use of Calm (n=585, 56.9%) to a waitlist control (n=444, 43.2%) for 8 weeks among employees of a large retail employer in the United States. A subset of individuals with elevated insomnia symptoms also had access to brief sleep coaching with Calm (n=101, 9.8%). Insomnia symptom severity, daytime sleepiness, and productivity impairment (ie, absenteeism, presenteeism, overall productivity impairment, and non–work activity impairment) were assessed at baseline and weeks 2, 4, 6, and 8. Indirect effects were evaluated with latent growth curve modeling to test whether the Calm intervention (Calm group vs waitlist control) was effective in reducing work productivity impairment through changes in sleep disturbance. RESULTS: No significant main effects of Calm intervention on productivity impairment were detected for any outcome at α level of .05, with the exception of non–work activity impairment models, in which Calm intervention reduced non–work activity impairment over time (P=.01 and P=.02 for insomnia and sleepiness models, respectively). Significant indirect effects of insomnia were detected for presenteeism (P=.002), overall work productivity (P=.01), and non–work activity impairment (P=.002); Calm intervention produced significantly greater reductions in insomnia symptoms (relative to waitlist control), and decreases in insomnia were associated with decreases in work productivity impairment. There was no significant indirect effect of change in insomnia on changes in absenteeism (P=.20). Furthermore, we detected no significant indirect effects of daytime sleepiness on productivity impairment. CONCLUSIONS: We found that Calm (plus sleep coaching for a small subset of individuals) had beneficial effects on employee sleep, and these benefits on sleep were related to indirect effects on productivity impairment (ie, presenteeism, overall work productivity impairment, and non–work activity impairment). There were no overall main effects of Calm intervention on productivity impairment; however, insomnia appears to be a mechanism associated with benefits for employee productivity. This is one of the first studies to suggest that sleep benefits of a mindfulness mobile app may also indirectly relate to benefits for workplace productivity. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05120310; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05120310 JMIR Publications 2022-09-28 /pmc/articles/PMC9557984/ /pubmed/36169994 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/40500 Text en ©Hallie Espel-Huynh, Matthew Baldwin, Megan Puzia, Jennifer Huberty. Originally published in JMIR mHealth and uHealth (https://mhealth.jmir.org), 28.09.2022. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://mhealth.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Espel-Huynh, Hallie
Baldwin, Matthew
Puzia, Megan
Huberty, Jennifer
The Indirect Effects of a Mindfulness Mobile App on Productivity Through Changes in Sleep Among Retail Employees: Secondary Analysis
title The Indirect Effects of a Mindfulness Mobile App on Productivity Through Changes in Sleep Among Retail Employees: Secondary Analysis
title_full The Indirect Effects of a Mindfulness Mobile App on Productivity Through Changes in Sleep Among Retail Employees: Secondary Analysis
title_fullStr The Indirect Effects of a Mindfulness Mobile App on Productivity Through Changes in Sleep Among Retail Employees: Secondary Analysis
title_full_unstemmed The Indirect Effects of a Mindfulness Mobile App on Productivity Through Changes in Sleep Among Retail Employees: Secondary Analysis
title_short The Indirect Effects of a Mindfulness Mobile App on Productivity Through Changes in Sleep Among Retail Employees: Secondary Analysis
title_sort indirect effects of a mindfulness mobile app on productivity through changes in sleep among retail employees: secondary analysis
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9557984/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36169994
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/40500
work_keys_str_mv AT espelhuynhhallie theindirecteffectsofamindfulnessmobileapponproductivitythroughchangesinsleepamongretailemployeessecondaryanalysis
AT baldwinmatthew theindirecteffectsofamindfulnessmobileapponproductivitythroughchangesinsleepamongretailemployeessecondaryanalysis
AT puziamegan theindirecteffectsofamindfulnessmobileapponproductivitythroughchangesinsleepamongretailemployeessecondaryanalysis
AT hubertyjennifer theindirecteffectsofamindfulnessmobileapponproductivitythroughchangesinsleepamongretailemployeessecondaryanalysis
AT espelhuynhhallie indirecteffectsofamindfulnessmobileapponproductivitythroughchangesinsleepamongretailemployeessecondaryanalysis
AT baldwinmatthew indirecteffectsofamindfulnessmobileapponproductivitythroughchangesinsleepamongretailemployeessecondaryanalysis
AT puziamegan indirecteffectsofamindfulnessmobileapponproductivitythroughchangesinsleepamongretailemployeessecondaryanalysis
AT hubertyjennifer indirecteffectsofamindfulnessmobileapponproductivitythroughchangesinsleepamongretailemployeessecondaryanalysis