Cargando…
Safety, Pharmacodynamic Response, and Treatment Satisfaction With OnabotulinumtoxinA 40 U, 60 U, and 80 U in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Dynamic Glabellar Lines
BACKGROUND: OnabotulinumtoxinA 20 U reduces glabellar line (GL) severity at maximum frown for approximately 3 to 4 months. Small studies have suggested that >20-U doses may increase the efficacy and duration of response for GLs. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate safety, pharmacody...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9558451/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35704394 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjac157 |
_version_ | 1784807443957547008 |
---|---|
author | Joseph, John H Maas, Corey Palm, Melanie D Lain, Edward Glaser, Dee Anna Bruce, Suzanne Yoelin, Steven Cox, Sue Ellen Fagien, Steven Sangha, Sara Maltman, John Lei, Xiaofang Brin, Mitchell F |
author_facet | Joseph, John H Maas, Corey Palm, Melanie D Lain, Edward Glaser, Dee Anna Bruce, Suzanne Yoelin, Steven Cox, Sue Ellen Fagien, Steven Sangha, Sara Maltman, John Lei, Xiaofang Brin, Mitchell F |
author_sort | Joseph, John H |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: OnabotulinumtoxinA 20 U reduces glabellar line (GL) severity at maximum frown for approximately 3 to 4 months. Small studies have suggested that >20-U doses may increase the efficacy and duration of response for GLs. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate safety, pharmacodynamic response, and treatment satisfaction with onabotulinumtoxinA doses ≥20 U for GLs. METHODS: This 48-week, double-blind study compared 40, 60, and 80 U onabotulinumtoxinA vs 20 U and placebo in women with moderate or severe dynamic GLs on the Allergan Facial Wrinkle Scale. The following parameters were evaluated: the percentage of subjects with investigator-assessed ≥1-grade Facial Wrinkle Scale improvement from baseline at maximum frown (responders) at Week 24; the estimated median duration of response; the proportion of mostly/very satisfied responders on the Facial Line Satisfaction Questionnaire follow-up Items 1 to 5; and treatment-emergent adverse events. RESULTS: The modified intent-to-treat population (N = 226) had a mean age of 48.0 years, with similar baseline GL severity between treatment groups. Week 24 responder rates were 0% for placebo and 16.0%, 32.0%, 30.6%, and 38.5% for onabotulinumtoxinA 20, 40, 60, and 80 U, with significant (P < 0.05) differences for 40 and 80 U vs 20 U. Median duration of response was longer with all higher doses vs 20 U (≥24.0 vs 19.7 weeks; P < 0.05 vs 20 U at Week 24). Facial Line Satisfaction Questionnaire results indicated high subject satisfaction. The incidence and severity of treatment-emergent adverse events did not exhibit a dose-response effect. CONCLUSIONS: GL treatment with onabotulinumtoxinA doses >20 U demonstrated longer duration of response and higher patient-reported satisfaction vs the on-label 20-U dose with no apparent impact on safety variables. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2: [Image: see text] |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9558451 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95584512022-10-14 Safety, Pharmacodynamic Response, and Treatment Satisfaction With OnabotulinumtoxinA 40 U, 60 U, and 80 U in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Dynamic Glabellar Lines Joseph, John H Maas, Corey Palm, Melanie D Lain, Edward Glaser, Dee Anna Bruce, Suzanne Yoelin, Steven Cox, Sue Ellen Fagien, Steven Sangha, Sara Maltman, John Lei, Xiaofang Brin, Mitchell F Aesthet Surg J Cosmetic Medicine BACKGROUND: OnabotulinumtoxinA 20 U reduces glabellar line (GL) severity at maximum frown for approximately 3 to 4 months. Small studies have suggested that >20-U doses may increase the efficacy and duration of response for GLs. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate safety, pharmacodynamic response, and treatment satisfaction with onabotulinumtoxinA doses ≥20 U for GLs. METHODS: This 48-week, double-blind study compared 40, 60, and 80 U onabotulinumtoxinA vs 20 U and placebo in women with moderate or severe dynamic GLs on the Allergan Facial Wrinkle Scale. The following parameters were evaluated: the percentage of subjects with investigator-assessed ≥1-grade Facial Wrinkle Scale improvement from baseline at maximum frown (responders) at Week 24; the estimated median duration of response; the proportion of mostly/very satisfied responders on the Facial Line Satisfaction Questionnaire follow-up Items 1 to 5; and treatment-emergent adverse events. RESULTS: The modified intent-to-treat population (N = 226) had a mean age of 48.0 years, with similar baseline GL severity between treatment groups. Week 24 responder rates were 0% for placebo and 16.0%, 32.0%, 30.6%, and 38.5% for onabotulinumtoxinA 20, 40, 60, and 80 U, with significant (P < 0.05) differences for 40 and 80 U vs 20 U. Median duration of response was longer with all higher doses vs 20 U (≥24.0 vs 19.7 weeks; P < 0.05 vs 20 U at Week 24). Facial Line Satisfaction Questionnaire results indicated high subject satisfaction. The incidence and severity of treatment-emergent adverse events did not exhibit a dose-response effect. CONCLUSIONS: GL treatment with onabotulinumtoxinA doses >20 U demonstrated longer duration of response and higher patient-reported satisfaction vs the on-label 20-U dose with no apparent impact on safety variables. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2: [Image: see text] Oxford University Press 2022-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9558451/ /pubmed/35704394 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjac157 Text en © 2022 The Aesthetic Society. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Cosmetic Medicine Joseph, John H Maas, Corey Palm, Melanie D Lain, Edward Glaser, Dee Anna Bruce, Suzanne Yoelin, Steven Cox, Sue Ellen Fagien, Steven Sangha, Sara Maltman, John Lei, Xiaofang Brin, Mitchell F Safety, Pharmacodynamic Response, and Treatment Satisfaction With OnabotulinumtoxinA 40 U, 60 U, and 80 U in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Dynamic Glabellar Lines |
title | Safety, Pharmacodynamic Response, and Treatment Satisfaction With OnabotulinumtoxinA 40 U, 60 U, and 80 U in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Dynamic Glabellar Lines |
title_full | Safety, Pharmacodynamic Response, and Treatment Satisfaction With OnabotulinumtoxinA 40 U, 60 U, and 80 U in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Dynamic Glabellar Lines |
title_fullStr | Safety, Pharmacodynamic Response, and Treatment Satisfaction With OnabotulinumtoxinA 40 U, 60 U, and 80 U in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Dynamic Glabellar Lines |
title_full_unstemmed | Safety, Pharmacodynamic Response, and Treatment Satisfaction With OnabotulinumtoxinA 40 U, 60 U, and 80 U in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Dynamic Glabellar Lines |
title_short | Safety, Pharmacodynamic Response, and Treatment Satisfaction With OnabotulinumtoxinA 40 U, 60 U, and 80 U in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Dynamic Glabellar Lines |
title_sort | safety, pharmacodynamic response, and treatment satisfaction with onabotulinumtoxina 40 u, 60 u, and 80 u in subjects with moderate to severe dynamic glabellar lines |
topic | Cosmetic Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9558451/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35704394 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjac157 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT josephjohnh safetypharmacodynamicresponseandtreatmentsatisfactionwithonabotulinumtoxina40u60uand80uinsubjectswithmoderatetoseveredynamicglabellarlines AT maascorey safetypharmacodynamicresponseandtreatmentsatisfactionwithonabotulinumtoxina40u60uand80uinsubjectswithmoderatetoseveredynamicglabellarlines AT palmmelanied safetypharmacodynamicresponseandtreatmentsatisfactionwithonabotulinumtoxina40u60uand80uinsubjectswithmoderatetoseveredynamicglabellarlines AT lainedward safetypharmacodynamicresponseandtreatmentsatisfactionwithonabotulinumtoxina40u60uand80uinsubjectswithmoderatetoseveredynamicglabellarlines AT glaserdeeanna safetypharmacodynamicresponseandtreatmentsatisfactionwithonabotulinumtoxina40u60uand80uinsubjectswithmoderatetoseveredynamicglabellarlines AT brucesuzanne safetypharmacodynamicresponseandtreatmentsatisfactionwithonabotulinumtoxina40u60uand80uinsubjectswithmoderatetoseveredynamicglabellarlines AT yoelinsteven safetypharmacodynamicresponseandtreatmentsatisfactionwithonabotulinumtoxina40u60uand80uinsubjectswithmoderatetoseveredynamicglabellarlines AT coxsueellen safetypharmacodynamicresponseandtreatmentsatisfactionwithonabotulinumtoxina40u60uand80uinsubjectswithmoderatetoseveredynamicglabellarlines AT fagiensteven safetypharmacodynamicresponseandtreatmentsatisfactionwithonabotulinumtoxina40u60uand80uinsubjectswithmoderatetoseveredynamicglabellarlines AT sanghasara safetypharmacodynamicresponseandtreatmentsatisfactionwithonabotulinumtoxina40u60uand80uinsubjectswithmoderatetoseveredynamicglabellarlines AT maltmanjohn safetypharmacodynamicresponseandtreatmentsatisfactionwithonabotulinumtoxina40u60uand80uinsubjectswithmoderatetoseveredynamicglabellarlines AT leixiaofang safetypharmacodynamicresponseandtreatmentsatisfactionwithonabotulinumtoxina40u60uand80uinsubjectswithmoderatetoseveredynamicglabellarlines AT brinmitchellf safetypharmacodynamicresponseandtreatmentsatisfactionwithonabotulinumtoxina40u60uand80uinsubjectswithmoderatetoseveredynamicglabellarlines |