Cargando…

Automated grating contrast-sensitivity: The easy test for hidden visual loss in recovered optic neuritis patient

PURPOSE: Residual visual loss is an important predictor of optic neuritis relapse and progression. This study aimed to investigate the hidden residual visual loss in patients with optic neuritis using automated contrast-sensitivity (CS) function testing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This cross-sectional s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mahayana, Indra Tri, Sakti, Dhimas Hari, Gani, Tatang Talka
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9558475/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36248078
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/tjo.tjo_21_21
_version_ 1784807449619857408
author Mahayana, Indra Tri
Sakti, Dhimas Hari
Gani, Tatang Talka
author_facet Mahayana, Indra Tri
Sakti, Dhimas Hari
Gani, Tatang Talka
author_sort Mahayana, Indra Tri
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Residual visual loss is an important predictor of optic neuritis relapse and progression. This study aimed to investigate the hidden residual visual loss in patients with optic neuritis using automated contrast-sensitivity (CS) function testing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This cross-sectional study investigated 29 recovered optic neuritis patients (age: 27.69 ± 13.32 years, range: 13–51). Twenty age-matched controls with normal visual acuity (VA, in LogMAR) were recruited, for comparison with patients' VA and CS function after stable recovery from optic neuritis (6 months of follow-up). CS tests used a novel software that displays a single set of Gabor patches (2 cycles per degree at 10° ×10° of visual angle) with contrasts grating from 100% to 0.1%. RESULTS: There were 13 adolescent patients (63.6%: retrobulbar neuritis [RN]; 36.4%: papillitis), 14 adult patients (50%: RN; 42.9%: papillitis), and only 2 older patients (all with neuroretinitis). There was improvement of VA in the patient group at first diagnosis and follow-up (VA initial vs. final: 1.438 ± 1.134 vs. 0.235 ± 0.272, P < 0.001). This VA improvement was similar to control group (P = 0.052). In CS, there were significant differences in patient versus control groups (69.069% ± 70.235% vs. 27.215% ± 25.27%, P = 0.025). Linear regression showed that initial VA and CS function could not predict final VA (P = 0.183 and P = 0.138, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with optic neuritis showed decreased CS compared to control group which indicated the residual visual loss. Automated CS testing is useful in detecting residual visual loss in patients who recovered from optic neuritis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9558475
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95584752022-10-14 Automated grating contrast-sensitivity: The easy test for hidden visual loss in recovered optic neuritis patient Mahayana, Indra Tri Sakti, Dhimas Hari Gani, Tatang Talka Taiwan J Ophthalmol Original Article PURPOSE: Residual visual loss is an important predictor of optic neuritis relapse and progression. This study aimed to investigate the hidden residual visual loss in patients with optic neuritis using automated contrast-sensitivity (CS) function testing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This cross-sectional study investigated 29 recovered optic neuritis patients (age: 27.69 ± 13.32 years, range: 13–51). Twenty age-matched controls with normal visual acuity (VA, in LogMAR) were recruited, for comparison with patients' VA and CS function after stable recovery from optic neuritis (6 months of follow-up). CS tests used a novel software that displays a single set of Gabor patches (2 cycles per degree at 10° ×10° of visual angle) with contrasts grating from 100% to 0.1%. RESULTS: There were 13 adolescent patients (63.6%: retrobulbar neuritis [RN]; 36.4%: papillitis), 14 adult patients (50%: RN; 42.9%: papillitis), and only 2 older patients (all with neuroretinitis). There was improvement of VA in the patient group at first diagnosis and follow-up (VA initial vs. final: 1.438 ± 1.134 vs. 0.235 ± 0.272, P < 0.001). This VA improvement was similar to control group (P = 0.052). In CS, there were significant differences in patient versus control groups (69.069% ± 70.235% vs. 27.215% ± 25.27%, P = 0.025). Linear regression showed that initial VA and CS function could not predict final VA (P = 0.183 and P = 0.138, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with optic neuritis showed decreased CS compared to control group which indicated the residual visual loss. Automated CS testing is useful in detecting residual visual loss in patients who recovered from optic neuritis. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021-08-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9558475/ /pubmed/36248078 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/tjo.tjo_21_21 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Taiwan J Ophthalmol https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Mahayana, Indra Tri
Sakti, Dhimas Hari
Gani, Tatang Talka
Automated grating contrast-sensitivity: The easy test for hidden visual loss in recovered optic neuritis patient
title Automated grating contrast-sensitivity: The easy test for hidden visual loss in recovered optic neuritis patient
title_full Automated grating contrast-sensitivity: The easy test for hidden visual loss in recovered optic neuritis patient
title_fullStr Automated grating contrast-sensitivity: The easy test for hidden visual loss in recovered optic neuritis patient
title_full_unstemmed Automated grating contrast-sensitivity: The easy test for hidden visual loss in recovered optic neuritis patient
title_short Automated grating contrast-sensitivity: The easy test for hidden visual loss in recovered optic neuritis patient
title_sort automated grating contrast-sensitivity: the easy test for hidden visual loss in recovered optic neuritis patient
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9558475/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36248078
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/tjo.tjo_21_21
work_keys_str_mv AT mahayanaindratri automatedgratingcontrastsensitivitytheeasytestforhiddenvisuallossinrecoveredopticneuritispatient
AT saktidhimashari automatedgratingcontrastsensitivitytheeasytestforhiddenvisuallossinrecoveredopticneuritispatient
AT ganitatangtalka automatedgratingcontrastsensitivitytheeasytestforhiddenvisuallossinrecoveredopticneuritispatient