Cargando…
Radiation exposure during modern therapeutic endoscopic ultrasound procedures and standard alternatives
Background and study aims Therapeutic EUS (t-EUS) is increasingly being adopted in clinical practice in tertiary referral centers; however, little is known about radiation exposure (RE) metrics and diagnostic reference limits for it. Methods Kerma-area product (KAP [Gy·cm (2) ]), Air Kerma and flu...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
2022
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9558486/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36247073 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1853-0451 |
_version_ | 1784807452308406272 |
---|---|
author | Vanella, Giuseppe Dell’Anna, Giuseppe Loria, Alessandro Petrone, Maria Chiara Del Vecchio, Antonella Arcidiacono, Paolo Giorgio |
author_facet | Vanella, Giuseppe Dell’Anna, Giuseppe Loria, Alessandro Petrone, Maria Chiara Del Vecchio, Antonella Arcidiacono, Paolo Giorgio |
author_sort | Vanella, Giuseppe |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background and study aims Therapeutic EUS (t-EUS) is increasingly being adopted in clinical practice in tertiary referral centers; however, little is known about radiation exposure (RE) metrics and diagnostic reference limits for it. Methods Kerma-area product (KAP [Gy·cm (2) ]), Air Kerma and fluoroscopy time were retrospectively evaluated for all consecutive t-EUS procedures performed in San Raffaele Institute between 2019 and 2021. For EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomies (EUS-CDS) and gastroenterostomies (EUS-GE), an equal number of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographies (ERCPs) plus metal stenting and duodenal stents were included respectively for comparison. Results Data from 141 t-EUS procedures were retrieved (49 % pancreatic cancer, 38 % peripancreatic fluid collections). EUS-CDS (N = 44) were mainly performed fluoroless, while ERCPs required a significantly higher RE (KAP = 25 [17–55], P < 0.0001). Fluid collection drainage (EUS-FCD) with lumen apposing metal stents (LAMS, N = 26) were performed fluoroless, while EUS-FCD with double-pigtail plastic stents (DPPS, N = 28) required higher RE (KAP = 23 [13–45]). EUS-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD, N = 6) required scarce RE (KAP = 9 [3–21]) for coaxial DPPS placement. EUS-GE (N = 27) required higher RE than duodenal stenting (KAP = 44 [28–88] versus 29 [19–46], P = 0.03). EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomies (EUS-HGS, N = 10) had the highest RE among t-EUS procedures (KAP = 81 [49–123]). Procedure complexity or intervening complications were evaluated and resulted in higher RE within each procedure. Conclusions t-EUS procedures have different RE ( P < 0.000001). EUS-CDS, EUS-GBD, and EUS-FCD with LAMS can be performed with no-to-mild radioscopy, unlike standard alternatives. However, radioscopy remains essential in case of technical difficulties or complications. EUS-GE and EUS-HGS involve a high RE. Endoscopists involved in t-EUS might experience RE higher than category standards, which indicates a need for increased awareness and personalized preventive measures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9558486 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Georg Thieme Verlag KG |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95584862022-10-14 Radiation exposure during modern therapeutic endoscopic ultrasound procedures and standard alternatives Vanella, Giuseppe Dell’Anna, Giuseppe Loria, Alessandro Petrone, Maria Chiara Del Vecchio, Antonella Arcidiacono, Paolo Giorgio Endosc Int Open Background and study aims Therapeutic EUS (t-EUS) is increasingly being adopted in clinical practice in tertiary referral centers; however, little is known about radiation exposure (RE) metrics and diagnostic reference limits for it. Methods Kerma-area product (KAP [Gy·cm (2) ]), Air Kerma and fluoroscopy time were retrospectively evaluated for all consecutive t-EUS procedures performed in San Raffaele Institute between 2019 and 2021. For EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomies (EUS-CDS) and gastroenterostomies (EUS-GE), an equal number of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographies (ERCPs) plus metal stenting and duodenal stents were included respectively for comparison. Results Data from 141 t-EUS procedures were retrieved (49 % pancreatic cancer, 38 % peripancreatic fluid collections). EUS-CDS (N = 44) were mainly performed fluoroless, while ERCPs required a significantly higher RE (KAP = 25 [17–55], P < 0.0001). Fluid collection drainage (EUS-FCD) with lumen apposing metal stents (LAMS, N = 26) were performed fluoroless, while EUS-FCD with double-pigtail plastic stents (DPPS, N = 28) required higher RE (KAP = 23 [13–45]). EUS-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD, N = 6) required scarce RE (KAP = 9 [3–21]) for coaxial DPPS placement. EUS-GE (N = 27) required higher RE than duodenal stenting (KAP = 44 [28–88] versus 29 [19–46], P = 0.03). EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomies (EUS-HGS, N = 10) had the highest RE among t-EUS procedures (KAP = 81 [49–123]). Procedure complexity or intervening complications were evaluated and resulted in higher RE within each procedure. Conclusions t-EUS procedures have different RE ( P < 0.000001). EUS-CDS, EUS-GBD, and EUS-FCD with LAMS can be performed with no-to-mild radioscopy, unlike standard alternatives. However, radioscopy remains essential in case of technical difficulties or complications. EUS-GE and EUS-HGS involve a high RE. Endoscopists involved in t-EUS might experience RE higher than category standards, which indicates a need for increased awareness and personalized preventive measures. Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2022-08-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9558486/ /pubmed/36247073 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1853-0451 Text en The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Vanella, Giuseppe Dell’Anna, Giuseppe Loria, Alessandro Petrone, Maria Chiara Del Vecchio, Antonella Arcidiacono, Paolo Giorgio Radiation exposure during modern therapeutic endoscopic ultrasound procedures and standard alternatives |
title | Radiation exposure during modern therapeutic endoscopic ultrasound procedures and standard alternatives |
title_full | Radiation exposure during modern therapeutic endoscopic ultrasound procedures and standard alternatives |
title_fullStr | Radiation exposure during modern therapeutic endoscopic ultrasound procedures and standard alternatives |
title_full_unstemmed | Radiation exposure during modern therapeutic endoscopic ultrasound procedures and standard alternatives |
title_short | Radiation exposure during modern therapeutic endoscopic ultrasound procedures and standard alternatives |
title_sort | radiation exposure during modern therapeutic endoscopic ultrasound procedures and standard alternatives |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9558486/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36247073 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1853-0451 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vanellagiuseppe radiationexposureduringmoderntherapeuticendoscopicultrasoundproceduresandstandardalternatives AT dellannagiuseppe radiationexposureduringmoderntherapeuticendoscopicultrasoundproceduresandstandardalternatives AT loriaalessandro radiationexposureduringmoderntherapeuticendoscopicultrasoundproceduresandstandardalternatives AT petronemariachiara radiationexposureduringmoderntherapeuticendoscopicultrasoundproceduresandstandardalternatives AT delvecchioantonella radiationexposureduringmoderntherapeuticendoscopicultrasoundproceduresandstandardalternatives AT arcidiaconopaologiorgio radiationexposureduringmoderntherapeuticendoscopicultrasoundproceduresandstandardalternatives |