Cargando…

Radiation exposure during modern therapeutic endoscopic ultrasound procedures and standard alternatives

Background and study aims  Therapeutic EUS (t-EUS) is increasingly being adopted in clinical practice in tertiary referral centers; however, little is known about radiation exposure (RE) metrics and diagnostic reference limits for it. Methods  Kerma-area product (KAP [Gy·cm (2) ]), Air Kerma and flu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vanella, Giuseppe, Dell’Anna, Giuseppe, Loria, Alessandro, Petrone, Maria Chiara, Del Vecchio, Antonella, Arcidiacono, Paolo Giorgio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2022
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9558486/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36247073
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1853-0451
_version_ 1784807452308406272
author Vanella, Giuseppe
Dell’Anna, Giuseppe
Loria, Alessandro
Petrone, Maria Chiara
Del Vecchio, Antonella
Arcidiacono, Paolo Giorgio
author_facet Vanella, Giuseppe
Dell’Anna, Giuseppe
Loria, Alessandro
Petrone, Maria Chiara
Del Vecchio, Antonella
Arcidiacono, Paolo Giorgio
author_sort Vanella, Giuseppe
collection PubMed
description Background and study aims  Therapeutic EUS (t-EUS) is increasingly being adopted in clinical practice in tertiary referral centers; however, little is known about radiation exposure (RE) metrics and diagnostic reference limits for it. Methods  Kerma-area product (KAP [Gy·cm (2) ]), Air Kerma and fluoroscopy time were retrospectively evaluated for all consecutive t-EUS procedures performed in San Raffaele Institute between 2019 and 2021. For EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomies (EUS-CDS) and gastroenterostomies (EUS-GE), an equal number of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographies (ERCPs) plus metal stenting and duodenal stents were included respectively for comparison. Results  Data from 141 t-EUS procedures were retrieved (49 % pancreatic cancer, 38 % peripancreatic fluid collections). EUS-CDS (N = 44) were mainly performed fluoroless, while ERCPs required a significantly higher RE (KAP = 25 [17–55], P < 0.0001). Fluid collection drainage (EUS-FCD) with lumen apposing metal stents (LAMS, N = 26) were performed fluoroless, while EUS-FCD with double-pigtail plastic stents (DPPS, N = 28) required higher RE (KAP = 23 [13–45]). EUS-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD, N = 6) required scarce RE (KAP = 9 [3–21]) for coaxial DPPS placement. EUS-GE (N = 27) required higher RE than duodenal stenting (KAP = 44 [28–88] versus 29 [19–46], P = 0.03). EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomies (EUS-HGS, N = 10) had the highest RE among t-EUS procedures (KAP = 81 [49–123]). Procedure complexity or intervening complications were evaluated and resulted in higher RE within each procedure. Conclusions  t-EUS procedures have different RE ( P  < 0.000001). EUS-CDS, EUS-GBD, and EUS-FCD with LAMS can be performed with no-to-mild radioscopy, unlike standard alternatives. However, radioscopy remains essential in case of technical difficulties or complications. EUS-GE and EUS-HGS involve a high RE. Endoscopists involved in t-EUS might experience RE higher than category standards, which indicates a need for increased awareness and personalized preventive measures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9558486
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Georg Thieme Verlag KG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95584862022-10-14 Radiation exposure during modern therapeutic endoscopic ultrasound procedures and standard alternatives Vanella, Giuseppe Dell’Anna, Giuseppe Loria, Alessandro Petrone, Maria Chiara Del Vecchio, Antonella Arcidiacono, Paolo Giorgio Endosc Int Open Background and study aims  Therapeutic EUS (t-EUS) is increasingly being adopted in clinical practice in tertiary referral centers; however, little is known about radiation exposure (RE) metrics and diagnostic reference limits for it. Methods  Kerma-area product (KAP [Gy·cm (2) ]), Air Kerma and fluoroscopy time were retrospectively evaluated for all consecutive t-EUS procedures performed in San Raffaele Institute between 2019 and 2021. For EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomies (EUS-CDS) and gastroenterostomies (EUS-GE), an equal number of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographies (ERCPs) plus metal stenting and duodenal stents were included respectively for comparison. Results  Data from 141 t-EUS procedures were retrieved (49 % pancreatic cancer, 38 % peripancreatic fluid collections). EUS-CDS (N = 44) were mainly performed fluoroless, while ERCPs required a significantly higher RE (KAP = 25 [17–55], P < 0.0001). Fluid collection drainage (EUS-FCD) with lumen apposing metal stents (LAMS, N = 26) were performed fluoroless, while EUS-FCD with double-pigtail plastic stents (DPPS, N = 28) required higher RE (KAP = 23 [13–45]). EUS-guided gallbladder drainage (EUS-GBD, N = 6) required scarce RE (KAP = 9 [3–21]) for coaxial DPPS placement. EUS-GE (N = 27) required higher RE than duodenal stenting (KAP = 44 [28–88] versus 29 [19–46], P = 0.03). EUS-guided hepaticogastrostomies (EUS-HGS, N = 10) had the highest RE among t-EUS procedures (KAP = 81 [49–123]). Procedure complexity or intervening complications were evaluated and resulted in higher RE within each procedure. Conclusions  t-EUS procedures have different RE ( P  < 0.000001). EUS-CDS, EUS-GBD, and EUS-FCD with LAMS can be performed with no-to-mild radioscopy, unlike standard alternatives. However, radioscopy remains essential in case of technical difficulties or complications. EUS-GE and EUS-HGS involve a high RE. Endoscopists involved in t-EUS might experience RE higher than category standards, which indicates a need for increased awareness and personalized preventive measures. Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2022-08-15 /pmc/articles/PMC9558486/ /pubmed/36247073 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1853-0451 Text en The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Vanella, Giuseppe
Dell’Anna, Giuseppe
Loria, Alessandro
Petrone, Maria Chiara
Del Vecchio, Antonella
Arcidiacono, Paolo Giorgio
Radiation exposure during modern therapeutic endoscopic ultrasound procedures and standard alternatives
title Radiation exposure during modern therapeutic endoscopic ultrasound procedures and standard alternatives
title_full Radiation exposure during modern therapeutic endoscopic ultrasound procedures and standard alternatives
title_fullStr Radiation exposure during modern therapeutic endoscopic ultrasound procedures and standard alternatives
title_full_unstemmed Radiation exposure during modern therapeutic endoscopic ultrasound procedures and standard alternatives
title_short Radiation exposure during modern therapeutic endoscopic ultrasound procedures and standard alternatives
title_sort radiation exposure during modern therapeutic endoscopic ultrasound procedures and standard alternatives
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9558486/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36247073
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1853-0451
work_keys_str_mv AT vanellagiuseppe radiationexposureduringmoderntherapeuticendoscopicultrasoundproceduresandstandardalternatives
AT dellannagiuseppe radiationexposureduringmoderntherapeuticendoscopicultrasoundproceduresandstandardalternatives
AT loriaalessandro radiationexposureduringmoderntherapeuticendoscopicultrasoundproceduresandstandardalternatives
AT petronemariachiara radiationexposureduringmoderntherapeuticendoscopicultrasoundproceduresandstandardalternatives
AT delvecchioantonella radiationexposureduringmoderntherapeuticendoscopicultrasoundproceduresandstandardalternatives
AT arcidiaconopaologiorgio radiationexposureduringmoderntherapeuticendoscopicultrasoundproceduresandstandardalternatives