Cargando…
Review on Preventive Measures to Reduce Post-Weaning Diarrhoea in Piglets
SIMPLE SUMMARY: Post-weaning diarrhoea (PWD) is a major challenge in pig production, which results in the high use of ZnO for its prevention and the utilisation of antibiotics for its treatment. There is a global agenda to decrease the use of antibiotics in order to reduce the risk of antimicrobial...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9558551/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36230326 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani12192585 |
_version_ | 1784807467693113344 |
---|---|
author | Canibe, Nuria Højberg, Ole Kongsted, Hanne Vodolazska, Darya Lauridsen, Charlotte Nielsen, Tina Skau Schönherz, Anna A. |
author_facet | Canibe, Nuria Højberg, Ole Kongsted, Hanne Vodolazska, Darya Lauridsen, Charlotte Nielsen, Tina Skau Schönherz, Anna A. |
author_sort | Canibe, Nuria |
collection | PubMed |
description | SIMPLE SUMMARY: Post-weaning diarrhoea (PWD) is a major challenge in pig production, which results in the high use of ZnO for its prevention and the utilisation of antibiotics for its treatment. There is a global agenda to decrease the use of antibiotics in order to reduce the risk of antimicrobial resistance (AMR); moreover, from June 2022, administering medical levels of ZnO has been banned in many countries due to its negative impact on the environment and AMR. Many feeding strategies and feed additives have been found to be tools to reduce PWD risk, which affect the gut microbiota and the host through different modes of action. Many feeding strategies and additives show positive but variable effects on PWD. A combination of such interventions tailored according to the specific conditions is most probably the best strategy. ABSTRACT: In many countries, medical levels of zinc (typically as zinc oxide) are added to piglet diets in the first two weeks post-weaning to prevent the development of post-weaning diarrhoea (PWD). However, high levels of zinc constitute an environmental polluting agent, and may contribute to the development and/or maintenance of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) among bacteria. Consequently, the EU banned administering medical levels of zinc in pig diets as of June 2022. However, this may result in an increased use of antibiotic therapeutics to combat PWD and thereby an increased risk of further AMR development. The search for alternative measures against PWD with a minimum use of antibiotics and in the absence of medical levels of zinc has therefore been intensified over recent years, and feed-related measures, including feed ingredients, feed additives, and feeding strategies, are being intensively investigated. Furthermore, management strategies have been developed and are undoubtedly relevant; however, these will not be addressed in this review. Here, feed measures (and vaccines) are addressed, these being probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics, postbiotics, proteobiotics, plants and plant extracts (in particular essential oils and tannins), macroalgae (particularly macroalgae-derived polysaccharides), dietary fibre, antimicrobial peptides, specific amino acids, dietary fatty acids, milk replacers, milk components, creep feed, vaccines, bacteriophages, and single-domain antibodies (nanobodies). The list covers measures with a rather long history and others that require significant development before their eventual use can be extended. To assess the potential of feed-related measures in combating PWD, the literature reviewed here has focused on studies reporting parameters of PWD (i.e., faeces score and/or faeces dry matter content during the first two weeks post-weaning). Although the impact on PWD (or related parameters) of the investigated measures may often be inconsistent, many studies do report positive effects. However, several studies have shown that control pigs do not suffer from diarrhoea, making it difficult to evaluate the biological and practical relevance of these improvements. From the reviewed literature, it is not possible to rank the efficacy of the various measures, and the efficacy most probably depends on a range of factors related to animal genetics and health status, additive doses used, composition of the feed, etc. We conclude that a combination of various measures is probably most recommendable in most situations. However, in this respect, it should be considered that combining strategies may lead to additive (e.g., synbiotics), synergistic (e.g., plant materials), or antagonistic (e.g., algae compounds) effects, requiring detailed knowledge on the modes of action in order to design effective strategies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9558551 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95585512022-10-14 Review on Preventive Measures to Reduce Post-Weaning Diarrhoea in Piglets Canibe, Nuria Højberg, Ole Kongsted, Hanne Vodolazska, Darya Lauridsen, Charlotte Nielsen, Tina Skau Schönherz, Anna A. Animals (Basel) Review SIMPLE SUMMARY: Post-weaning diarrhoea (PWD) is a major challenge in pig production, which results in the high use of ZnO for its prevention and the utilisation of antibiotics for its treatment. There is a global agenda to decrease the use of antibiotics in order to reduce the risk of antimicrobial resistance (AMR); moreover, from June 2022, administering medical levels of ZnO has been banned in many countries due to its negative impact on the environment and AMR. Many feeding strategies and feed additives have been found to be tools to reduce PWD risk, which affect the gut microbiota and the host through different modes of action. Many feeding strategies and additives show positive but variable effects on PWD. A combination of such interventions tailored according to the specific conditions is most probably the best strategy. ABSTRACT: In many countries, medical levels of zinc (typically as zinc oxide) are added to piglet diets in the first two weeks post-weaning to prevent the development of post-weaning diarrhoea (PWD). However, high levels of zinc constitute an environmental polluting agent, and may contribute to the development and/or maintenance of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) among bacteria. Consequently, the EU banned administering medical levels of zinc in pig diets as of June 2022. However, this may result in an increased use of antibiotic therapeutics to combat PWD and thereby an increased risk of further AMR development. The search for alternative measures against PWD with a minimum use of antibiotics and in the absence of medical levels of zinc has therefore been intensified over recent years, and feed-related measures, including feed ingredients, feed additives, and feeding strategies, are being intensively investigated. Furthermore, management strategies have been developed and are undoubtedly relevant; however, these will not be addressed in this review. Here, feed measures (and vaccines) are addressed, these being probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics, postbiotics, proteobiotics, plants and plant extracts (in particular essential oils and tannins), macroalgae (particularly macroalgae-derived polysaccharides), dietary fibre, antimicrobial peptides, specific amino acids, dietary fatty acids, milk replacers, milk components, creep feed, vaccines, bacteriophages, and single-domain antibodies (nanobodies). The list covers measures with a rather long history and others that require significant development before their eventual use can be extended. To assess the potential of feed-related measures in combating PWD, the literature reviewed here has focused on studies reporting parameters of PWD (i.e., faeces score and/or faeces dry matter content during the first two weeks post-weaning). Although the impact on PWD (or related parameters) of the investigated measures may often be inconsistent, many studies do report positive effects. However, several studies have shown that control pigs do not suffer from diarrhoea, making it difficult to evaluate the biological and practical relevance of these improvements. From the reviewed literature, it is not possible to rank the efficacy of the various measures, and the efficacy most probably depends on a range of factors related to animal genetics and health status, additive doses used, composition of the feed, etc. We conclude that a combination of various measures is probably most recommendable in most situations. However, in this respect, it should be considered that combining strategies may lead to additive (e.g., synbiotics), synergistic (e.g., plant materials), or antagonistic (e.g., algae compounds) effects, requiring detailed knowledge on the modes of action in order to design effective strategies. MDPI 2022-09-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9558551/ /pubmed/36230326 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani12192585 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Canibe, Nuria Højberg, Ole Kongsted, Hanne Vodolazska, Darya Lauridsen, Charlotte Nielsen, Tina Skau Schönherz, Anna A. Review on Preventive Measures to Reduce Post-Weaning Diarrhoea in Piglets |
title | Review on Preventive Measures to Reduce Post-Weaning Diarrhoea in Piglets |
title_full | Review on Preventive Measures to Reduce Post-Weaning Diarrhoea in Piglets |
title_fullStr | Review on Preventive Measures to Reduce Post-Weaning Diarrhoea in Piglets |
title_full_unstemmed | Review on Preventive Measures to Reduce Post-Weaning Diarrhoea in Piglets |
title_short | Review on Preventive Measures to Reduce Post-Weaning Diarrhoea in Piglets |
title_sort | review on preventive measures to reduce post-weaning diarrhoea in piglets |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9558551/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36230326 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani12192585 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT canibenuria reviewonpreventivemeasurestoreducepostweaningdiarrhoeainpiglets AT højbergole reviewonpreventivemeasurestoreducepostweaningdiarrhoeainpiglets AT kongstedhanne reviewonpreventivemeasurestoreducepostweaningdiarrhoeainpiglets AT vodolazskadarya reviewonpreventivemeasurestoreducepostweaningdiarrhoeainpiglets AT lauridsencharlotte reviewonpreventivemeasurestoreducepostweaningdiarrhoeainpiglets AT nielsentinaskau reviewonpreventivemeasurestoreducepostweaningdiarrhoeainpiglets AT schonherzannaa reviewonpreventivemeasurestoreducepostweaningdiarrhoeainpiglets |