Cargando…

Comparison of Oral versus Intramuscular Clonidine for the Prolongation of Bupivacaine Spinal Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Lower Abdominal and Lower Limb Surgeries

BACKGROUND: Spinal subarachnoid block (SAB) is the first choice anesthesia in lower abdominal and lower limb surgeries. It produces a varying degree of sensory analgesia, motor blockade, and sympathetic blockade depending on the dose, concentration, and volume of the local anesthetic given. This stu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Singh, Raj Bahadur, Shekhar, Saurav, De, Ranjeet Rana, Singh, Siddharth, Singh, Ritu, Singh, Akrity
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9558664/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36249136
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aer.aer_31_22
_version_ 1784807490492301312
author Singh, Raj Bahadur
Shekhar, Saurav
De, Ranjeet Rana
Singh, Siddharth
Singh, Ritu
Singh, Akrity
author_facet Singh, Raj Bahadur
Shekhar, Saurav
De, Ranjeet Rana
Singh, Siddharth
Singh, Ritu
Singh, Akrity
author_sort Singh, Raj Bahadur
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Spinal subarachnoid block (SAB) is the first choice anesthesia in lower abdominal and lower limb surgeries. It produces a varying degree of sensory analgesia, motor blockade, and sympathetic blockade depending on the dose, concentration, and volume of the local anesthetic given. This study was undertaken to assess the degree of sensory and motor block with 150 μg of oral versus intramuscular clonidine as an adjuvant to bupivacaine for spinal anesthesia. AIMS AND OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of oral versus intramuscular clonidine as an adjuvant to bupivacaine for the prolongation of sensory and motor block in patients undergoing lower abdominal and lower limb surgeries under SAB. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After institutional ethical clearance, 90 patients were randomized into three groups scheduled for lower abdominal and lower limb surgeries under spinal anesthesia. • Group O: Bupivacaine 0.5% (heavy) 3.0 mL and oral clonidine 150 μg 1 h before spinal anesthesia. • Group I: Bupivacaine 0.5% (heavy) 3.0 mL and intramuscular clonidine 150 μg 1 h before spinal anesthesia. • Group C: Control group – 3 mL bupivacaine 0.5% (heavy) alone. RESULT: The onset of sensory block in Group O was 4.9 ± 0.52 min, whereas in Group I, it was 4.6 ± 0.42 min than Group C (5.1 ± 0.60). Onset of motor block was also significantly lower in Group O and Group I (3.9 ± 0.53 and 3.7 ± 0.42 min) than in Group C (4.4 ± 0.6 min) which was a control group. There was also a significant difference in the duration of the sensory block between Group O (206.4 ± 9.2 min), Group I (219 ± 8.6 min), and Group C (184.3 ± 9.1 min). The duration of motor block was significantly higher in Group O (183.6 ± 8.2 min) and Group I (197.8 ± 9.6 min) when compared to Group C (162.8 ± 8.9 min). The timing of rescue analgesia in Group O was 222.4 ± 11.7 min, whereas in Group I, it was 243.46 ± 10.9. CONCLUSION: On the basis of finding of our study, we conclude that the use of clonidine as a premedication at a dose of 150 μg significantly increased the duration of sensory block, motor block, and duration of analgesia and shortened the time of onset of sensory and motor blockade.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9558664
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95586642022-10-14 Comparison of Oral versus Intramuscular Clonidine for the Prolongation of Bupivacaine Spinal Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Lower Abdominal and Lower Limb Surgeries Singh, Raj Bahadur Shekhar, Saurav De, Ranjeet Rana Singh, Siddharth Singh, Ritu Singh, Akrity Anesth Essays Res Original Article BACKGROUND: Spinal subarachnoid block (SAB) is the first choice anesthesia in lower abdominal and lower limb surgeries. It produces a varying degree of sensory analgesia, motor blockade, and sympathetic blockade depending on the dose, concentration, and volume of the local anesthetic given. This study was undertaken to assess the degree of sensory and motor block with 150 μg of oral versus intramuscular clonidine as an adjuvant to bupivacaine for spinal anesthesia. AIMS AND OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of oral versus intramuscular clonidine as an adjuvant to bupivacaine for the prolongation of sensory and motor block in patients undergoing lower abdominal and lower limb surgeries under SAB. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After institutional ethical clearance, 90 patients were randomized into three groups scheduled for lower abdominal and lower limb surgeries under spinal anesthesia. • Group O: Bupivacaine 0.5% (heavy) 3.0 mL and oral clonidine 150 μg 1 h before spinal anesthesia. • Group I: Bupivacaine 0.5% (heavy) 3.0 mL and intramuscular clonidine 150 μg 1 h before spinal anesthesia. • Group C: Control group – 3 mL bupivacaine 0.5% (heavy) alone. RESULT: The onset of sensory block in Group O was 4.9 ± 0.52 min, whereas in Group I, it was 4.6 ± 0.42 min than Group C (5.1 ± 0.60). Onset of motor block was also significantly lower in Group O and Group I (3.9 ± 0.53 and 3.7 ± 0.42 min) than in Group C (4.4 ± 0.6 min) which was a control group. There was also a significant difference in the duration of the sensory block between Group O (206.4 ± 9.2 min), Group I (219 ± 8.6 min), and Group C (184.3 ± 9.1 min). The duration of motor block was significantly higher in Group O (183.6 ± 8.2 min) and Group I (197.8 ± 9.6 min) when compared to Group C (162.8 ± 8.9 min). The timing of rescue analgesia in Group O was 222.4 ± 11.7 min, whereas in Group I, it was 243.46 ± 10.9. CONCLUSION: On the basis of finding of our study, we conclude that the use of clonidine as a premedication at a dose of 150 μg significantly increased the duration of sensory block, motor block, and duration of analgesia and shortened the time of onset of sensory and motor blockade. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022 2022-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9558664/ /pubmed/36249136 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aer.aer_31_22 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Anesthesia: Essays and Researches https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Singh, Raj Bahadur
Shekhar, Saurav
De, Ranjeet Rana
Singh, Siddharth
Singh, Ritu
Singh, Akrity
Comparison of Oral versus Intramuscular Clonidine for the Prolongation of Bupivacaine Spinal Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Lower Abdominal and Lower Limb Surgeries
title Comparison of Oral versus Intramuscular Clonidine for the Prolongation of Bupivacaine Spinal Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Lower Abdominal and Lower Limb Surgeries
title_full Comparison of Oral versus Intramuscular Clonidine for the Prolongation of Bupivacaine Spinal Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Lower Abdominal and Lower Limb Surgeries
title_fullStr Comparison of Oral versus Intramuscular Clonidine for the Prolongation of Bupivacaine Spinal Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Lower Abdominal and Lower Limb Surgeries
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Oral versus Intramuscular Clonidine for the Prolongation of Bupivacaine Spinal Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Lower Abdominal and Lower Limb Surgeries
title_short Comparison of Oral versus Intramuscular Clonidine for the Prolongation of Bupivacaine Spinal Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Lower Abdominal and Lower Limb Surgeries
title_sort comparison of oral versus intramuscular clonidine for the prolongation of bupivacaine spinal anesthesia in patients undergoing lower abdominal and lower limb surgeries
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9558664/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36249136
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aer.aer_31_22
work_keys_str_mv AT singhrajbahadur comparisonoforalversusintramuscularclonidinefortheprolongationofbupivacainespinalanesthesiainpatientsundergoinglowerabdominalandlowerlimbsurgeries
AT shekharsaurav comparisonoforalversusintramuscularclonidinefortheprolongationofbupivacainespinalanesthesiainpatientsundergoinglowerabdominalandlowerlimbsurgeries
AT deranjeetrana comparisonoforalversusintramuscularclonidinefortheprolongationofbupivacainespinalanesthesiainpatientsundergoinglowerabdominalandlowerlimbsurgeries
AT singhsiddharth comparisonoforalversusintramuscularclonidinefortheprolongationofbupivacainespinalanesthesiainpatientsundergoinglowerabdominalandlowerlimbsurgeries
AT singhritu comparisonoforalversusintramuscularclonidinefortheprolongationofbupivacainespinalanesthesiainpatientsundergoinglowerabdominalandlowerlimbsurgeries
AT singhakrity comparisonoforalversusintramuscularclonidinefortheprolongationofbupivacainespinalanesthesiainpatientsundergoinglowerabdominalandlowerlimbsurgeries