Cargando…
Understanding the use of evidence in the WHO Classification of Tumours: a protocol for an evidence gap map of the classification of tumours of the lung
INTRODUCTION: There are gaps in the evidence base of tumour classification despite being essential for cancer diagnosis, treatment and patient care. The WHO in charge of the production of an updated international classification, the WHO Classification of Tumours (WCT), aims to adapt evidence gap map...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9558796/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36220326 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061240 |
_version_ | 1784807521957969920 |
---|---|
author | del Aguila Mejía, Javier Armon, Subasri Campbell, Fiona Colling, Richard Chechlinska, Magdalena Kowalewska, Magdalena Pollán, Marina Holdenrieder, Stefan Tan, Puay Hoon Cree, Ian Indave Ruiz, Blanca Iciar |
author_facet | del Aguila Mejía, Javier Armon, Subasri Campbell, Fiona Colling, Richard Chechlinska, Magdalena Kowalewska, Magdalena Pollán, Marina Holdenrieder, Stefan Tan, Puay Hoon Cree, Ian Indave Ruiz, Blanca Iciar |
author_sort | del Aguila Mejía, Javier |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: There are gaps in the evidence base of tumour classification despite being essential for cancer diagnosis, treatment and patient care. The WHO in charge of the production of an updated international classification, the WHO Classification of Tumours (WCT), aims to adapt evidence gap map (EGM) methodology to inform future editions of the WCT, by providing a visual summary of the existing evidence. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Bibliographical references used in the WCT fifth edition of Tumours of the Lung (Thoracic Tumours volume) will be used as search results of a literature search. A descriptive analysis of the cited evidence for tumour types and descriptors will be drafted and plotted in EPPI-Reviewer to develop a visual evidence map. The resulting EGM will reflect the number of cited studies in the size of the spheres, and the level of evidence by applying a four-colour code (red=low level evidence, orange=moderate level, green=high level and blue=unclassifiable). Overview of the findings will be provided in narrative form and a report will discuss the overall stage of cited research in the WCT and will include analysis of gaps, under-researched categories of tumour descriptors and pockets of low-level evidence. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No ethics approval will be required as this is a study of previously published material. Findings of the EGM will be published and used to guide editors, stakeholders and researchers for future research planning and related decision-making, especially for the development of future editions of the WCT. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022302327. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9558796 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95587962022-10-14 Understanding the use of evidence in the WHO Classification of Tumours: a protocol for an evidence gap map of the classification of tumours of the lung del Aguila Mejía, Javier Armon, Subasri Campbell, Fiona Colling, Richard Chechlinska, Magdalena Kowalewska, Magdalena Pollán, Marina Holdenrieder, Stefan Tan, Puay Hoon Cree, Ian Indave Ruiz, Blanca Iciar BMJ Open Evidence Based Practice INTRODUCTION: There are gaps in the evidence base of tumour classification despite being essential for cancer diagnosis, treatment and patient care. The WHO in charge of the production of an updated international classification, the WHO Classification of Tumours (WCT), aims to adapt evidence gap map (EGM) methodology to inform future editions of the WCT, by providing a visual summary of the existing evidence. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Bibliographical references used in the WCT fifth edition of Tumours of the Lung (Thoracic Tumours volume) will be used as search results of a literature search. A descriptive analysis of the cited evidence for tumour types and descriptors will be drafted and plotted in EPPI-Reviewer to develop a visual evidence map. The resulting EGM will reflect the number of cited studies in the size of the spheres, and the level of evidence by applying a four-colour code (red=low level evidence, orange=moderate level, green=high level and blue=unclassifiable). Overview of the findings will be provided in narrative form and a report will discuss the overall stage of cited research in the WCT and will include analysis of gaps, under-researched categories of tumour descriptors and pockets of low-level evidence. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No ethics approval will be required as this is a study of previously published material. Findings of the EGM will be published and used to guide editors, stakeholders and researchers for future research planning and related decision-making, especially for the development of future editions of the WCT. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022302327. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-10-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9558796/ /pubmed/36220326 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061240 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Evidence Based Practice del Aguila Mejía, Javier Armon, Subasri Campbell, Fiona Colling, Richard Chechlinska, Magdalena Kowalewska, Magdalena Pollán, Marina Holdenrieder, Stefan Tan, Puay Hoon Cree, Ian Indave Ruiz, Blanca Iciar Understanding the use of evidence in the WHO Classification of Tumours: a protocol for an evidence gap map of the classification of tumours of the lung |
title | Understanding the use of evidence in the WHO Classification of Tumours: a protocol for an evidence gap map of the classification of tumours of the lung |
title_full | Understanding the use of evidence in the WHO Classification of Tumours: a protocol for an evidence gap map of the classification of tumours of the lung |
title_fullStr | Understanding the use of evidence in the WHO Classification of Tumours: a protocol for an evidence gap map of the classification of tumours of the lung |
title_full_unstemmed | Understanding the use of evidence in the WHO Classification of Tumours: a protocol for an evidence gap map of the classification of tumours of the lung |
title_short | Understanding the use of evidence in the WHO Classification of Tumours: a protocol for an evidence gap map of the classification of tumours of the lung |
title_sort | understanding the use of evidence in the who classification of tumours: a protocol for an evidence gap map of the classification of tumours of the lung |
topic | Evidence Based Practice |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9558796/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36220326 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061240 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT delaguilamejiajavier understandingtheuseofevidenceinthewhoclassificationoftumoursaprotocolforanevidencegapmapoftheclassificationoftumoursofthelung AT armonsubasri understandingtheuseofevidenceinthewhoclassificationoftumoursaprotocolforanevidencegapmapoftheclassificationoftumoursofthelung AT campbellfiona understandingtheuseofevidenceinthewhoclassificationoftumoursaprotocolforanevidencegapmapoftheclassificationoftumoursofthelung AT collingrichard understandingtheuseofevidenceinthewhoclassificationoftumoursaprotocolforanevidencegapmapoftheclassificationoftumoursofthelung AT chechlinskamagdalena understandingtheuseofevidenceinthewhoclassificationoftumoursaprotocolforanevidencegapmapoftheclassificationoftumoursofthelung AT kowalewskamagdalena understandingtheuseofevidenceinthewhoclassificationoftumoursaprotocolforanevidencegapmapoftheclassificationoftumoursofthelung AT pollanmarina understandingtheuseofevidenceinthewhoclassificationoftumoursaprotocolforanevidencegapmapoftheclassificationoftumoursofthelung AT holdenriederstefan understandingtheuseofevidenceinthewhoclassificationoftumoursaprotocolforanevidencegapmapoftheclassificationoftumoursofthelung AT tanpuayhoon understandingtheuseofevidenceinthewhoclassificationoftumoursaprotocolforanevidencegapmapoftheclassificationoftumoursofthelung AT creeian understandingtheuseofevidenceinthewhoclassificationoftumoursaprotocolforanevidencegapmapoftheclassificationoftumoursofthelung AT indaveruizblancaiciar understandingtheuseofevidenceinthewhoclassificationoftumoursaprotocolforanevidencegapmapoftheclassificationoftumoursofthelung |