Cargando…

Understanding the use of evidence in the WHO Classification of Tumours: a protocol for an evidence gap map of the classification of tumours of the lung

INTRODUCTION: There are gaps in the evidence base of tumour classification despite being essential for cancer diagnosis, treatment and patient care. The WHO in charge of the production of an updated international classification, the WHO Classification of Tumours (WCT), aims to adapt evidence gap map...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: del Aguila Mejía, Javier, Armon, Subasri, Campbell, Fiona, Colling, Richard, Chechlinska, Magdalena, Kowalewska, Magdalena, Pollán, Marina, Holdenrieder, Stefan, Tan, Puay Hoon, Cree, Ian, Indave Ruiz, Blanca Iciar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9558796/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36220326
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061240
_version_ 1784807521957969920
author del Aguila Mejía, Javier
Armon, Subasri
Campbell, Fiona
Colling, Richard
Chechlinska, Magdalena
Kowalewska, Magdalena
Pollán, Marina
Holdenrieder, Stefan
Tan, Puay Hoon
Cree, Ian
Indave Ruiz, Blanca Iciar
author_facet del Aguila Mejía, Javier
Armon, Subasri
Campbell, Fiona
Colling, Richard
Chechlinska, Magdalena
Kowalewska, Magdalena
Pollán, Marina
Holdenrieder, Stefan
Tan, Puay Hoon
Cree, Ian
Indave Ruiz, Blanca Iciar
author_sort del Aguila Mejía, Javier
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: There are gaps in the evidence base of tumour classification despite being essential for cancer diagnosis, treatment and patient care. The WHO in charge of the production of an updated international classification, the WHO Classification of Tumours (WCT), aims to adapt evidence gap map (EGM) methodology to inform future editions of the WCT, by providing a visual summary of the existing evidence. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Bibliographical references used in the WCT fifth edition of Tumours of the Lung (Thoracic Tumours volume) will be used as search results of a literature search. A descriptive analysis of the cited evidence for tumour types and descriptors will be drafted and plotted in EPPI-Reviewer to develop a visual evidence map. The resulting EGM will reflect the number of cited studies in the size of the spheres, and the level of evidence by applying a four-colour code (red=low level evidence, orange=moderate level, green=high level and blue=unclassifiable). Overview of the findings will be provided in narrative form and a report will discuss the overall stage of cited research in the WCT and will include analysis of gaps, under-researched categories of tumour descriptors and pockets of low-level evidence. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No ethics approval will be required as this is a study of previously published material. Findings of the EGM will be published and used to guide editors, stakeholders and researchers for future research planning and related decision-making, especially for the development of future editions of the WCT. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022302327.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9558796
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95587962022-10-14 Understanding the use of evidence in the WHO Classification of Tumours: a protocol for an evidence gap map of the classification of tumours of the lung del Aguila Mejía, Javier Armon, Subasri Campbell, Fiona Colling, Richard Chechlinska, Magdalena Kowalewska, Magdalena Pollán, Marina Holdenrieder, Stefan Tan, Puay Hoon Cree, Ian Indave Ruiz, Blanca Iciar BMJ Open Evidence Based Practice INTRODUCTION: There are gaps in the evidence base of tumour classification despite being essential for cancer diagnosis, treatment and patient care. The WHO in charge of the production of an updated international classification, the WHO Classification of Tumours (WCT), aims to adapt evidence gap map (EGM) methodology to inform future editions of the WCT, by providing a visual summary of the existing evidence. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Bibliographical references used in the WCT fifth edition of Tumours of the Lung (Thoracic Tumours volume) will be used as search results of a literature search. A descriptive analysis of the cited evidence for tumour types and descriptors will be drafted and plotted in EPPI-Reviewer to develop a visual evidence map. The resulting EGM will reflect the number of cited studies in the size of the spheres, and the level of evidence by applying a four-colour code (red=low level evidence, orange=moderate level, green=high level and blue=unclassifiable). Overview of the findings will be provided in narrative form and a report will discuss the overall stage of cited research in the WCT and will include analysis of gaps, under-researched categories of tumour descriptors and pockets of low-level evidence. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No ethics approval will be required as this is a study of previously published material. Findings of the EGM will be published and used to guide editors, stakeholders and researchers for future research planning and related decision-making, especially for the development of future editions of the WCT. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42022302327. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-10-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9558796/ /pubmed/36220326 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061240 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Evidence Based Practice
del Aguila Mejía, Javier
Armon, Subasri
Campbell, Fiona
Colling, Richard
Chechlinska, Magdalena
Kowalewska, Magdalena
Pollán, Marina
Holdenrieder, Stefan
Tan, Puay Hoon
Cree, Ian
Indave Ruiz, Blanca Iciar
Understanding the use of evidence in the WHO Classification of Tumours: a protocol for an evidence gap map of the classification of tumours of the lung
title Understanding the use of evidence in the WHO Classification of Tumours: a protocol for an evidence gap map of the classification of tumours of the lung
title_full Understanding the use of evidence in the WHO Classification of Tumours: a protocol for an evidence gap map of the classification of tumours of the lung
title_fullStr Understanding the use of evidence in the WHO Classification of Tumours: a protocol for an evidence gap map of the classification of tumours of the lung
title_full_unstemmed Understanding the use of evidence in the WHO Classification of Tumours: a protocol for an evidence gap map of the classification of tumours of the lung
title_short Understanding the use of evidence in the WHO Classification of Tumours: a protocol for an evidence gap map of the classification of tumours of the lung
title_sort understanding the use of evidence in the who classification of tumours: a protocol for an evidence gap map of the classification of tumours of the lung
topic Evidence Based Practice
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9558796/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36220326
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061240
work_keys_str_mv AT delaguilamejiajavier understandingtheuseofevidenceinthewhoclassificationoftumoursaprotocolforanevidencegapmapoftheclassificationoftumoursofthelung
AT armonsubasri understandingtheuseofevidenceinthewhoclassificationoftumoursaprotocolforanevidencegapmapoftheclassificationoftumoursofthelung
AT campbellfiona understandingtheuseofevidenceinthewhoclassificationoftumoursaprotocolforanevidencegapmapoftheclassificationoftumoursofthelung
AT collingrichard understandingtheuseofevidenceinthewhoclassificationoftumoursaprotocolforanevidencegapmapoftheclassificationoftumoursofthelung
AT chechlinskamagdalena understandingtheuseofevidenceinthewhoclassificationoftumoursaprotocolforanevidencegapmapoftheclassificationoftumoursofthelung
AT kowalewskamagdalena understandingtheuseofevidenceinthewhoclassificationoftumoursaprotocolforanevidencegapmapoftheclassificationoftumoursofthelung
AT pollanmarina understandingtheuseofevidenceinthewhoclassificationoftumoursaprotocolforanevidencegapmapoftheclassificationoftumoursofthelung
AT holdenriederstefan understandingtheuseofevidenceinthewhoclassificationoftumoursaprotocolforanevidencegapmapoftheclassificationoftumoursofthelung
AT tanpuayhoon understandingtheuseofevidenceinthewhoclassificationoftumoursaprotocolforanevidencegapmapoftheclassificationoftumoursofthelung
AT creeian understandingtheuseofevidenceinthewhoclassificationoftumoursaprotocolforanevidencegapmapoftheclassificationoftumoursofthelung
AT indaveruizblancaiciar understandingtheuseofevidenceinthewhoclassificationoftumoursaprotocolforanevidencegapmapoftheclassificationoftumoursofthelung