Cargando…
The Occurrence Birth–Death Process for Combined-Evidence Analysis in Macroevolution and Epidemiology
Phylodynamic models generally aim at jointly inferring phylogenetic relationships, model parameters, and more recently, the number of lineages through time, based on molecular sequence data. In the fields of epidemiology and macroevolution, these models can be used to estimate, respectively, the pas...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9558841/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35608305 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syac037 |
_version_ | 1784807532374523904 |
---|---|
author | Andréoletti, Jérémy Zwaans, Antoine Warnock, Rachel C M Aguirre-Fernández, Gabriel Barido-Sottani, Joëlle Gupta, Ankit Stadler, Tanja Manceau, Marc |
author_facet | Andréoletti, Jérémy Zwaans, Antoine Warnock, Rachel C M Aguirre-Fernández, Gabriel Barido-Sottani, Joëlle Gupta, Ankit Stadler, Tanja Manceau, Marc |
author_sort | Andréoletti, Jérémy |
collection | PubMed |
description | Phylodynamic models generally aim at jointly inferring phylogenetic relationships, model parameters, and more recently, the number of lineages through time, based on molecular sequence data. In the fields of epidemiology and macroevolution, these models can be used to estimate, respectively, the past number of infected individuals (prevalence) or the past number of species (paleodiversity) through time. Recent years have seen the development of “total-evidence” analyses, which combine molecular and morphological data from extant and past sampled individuals in a unified Bayesian inference framework. Even sampled individuals characterized only by their sampling time, that is, lacking morphological and molecular data, which we call occurrences, provide invaluable information to estimate the past number of lineages. Here, we present new methodological developments around the fossilized birth–death process enabling us to (i) incorporate occurrence data in the likelihood function; (ii) consider piecewise-constant birth, death, and sampling rates; and (iii) estimate the past number of lineages, with or without knowledge of the underlying tree. We implement our method in the RevBayes software environment, enabling its use along with a large set of models of molecular and morphological evolution, and validate the inference workflow using simulations under a wide range of conditions. We finally illustrate our new implementation using two empirical data sets stemming from the fields of epidemiology and macroevolution. In epidemiology, we infer the prevalence of the coronavirus disease 2019 outbreak on the Diamond Princess ship, by taking into account jointly the case count record (occurrences) along with viral sequences for a fraction of infected individuals. In macroevolution, we infer the diversity trajectory of cetaceans using molecular and morphological data from extant taxa, morphological data from fossils, as well as numerous fossil occurrences. The joint modeling of occurrences and trees holds the promise to further bridge the gap between traditional epidemiology and pathogen genomics, as well as paleontology and molecular phylogenetics. [Birth–death model; epidemiology; fossils; macroevolution; occurrences; phylogenetics; skyline.] |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9558841 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95588412022-10-18 The Occurrence Birth–Death Process for Combined-Evidence Analysis in Macroevolution and Epidemiology Andréoletti, Jérémy Zwaans, Antoine Warnock, Rachel C M Aguirre-Fernández, Gabriel Barido-Sottani, Joëlle Gupta, Ankit Stadler, Tanja Manceau, Marc Syst Biol Regular Articles Phylodynamic models generally aim at jointly inferring phylogenetic relationships, model parameters, and more recently, the number of lineages through time, based on molecular sequence data. In the fields of epidemiology and macroevolution, these models can be used to estimate, respectively, the past number of infected individuals (prevalence) or the past number of species (paleodiversity) through time. Recent years have seen the development of “total-evidence” analyses, which combine molecular and morphological data from extant and past sampled individuals in a unified Bayesian inference framework. Even sampled individuals characterized only by their sampling time, that is, lacking morphological and molecular data, which we call occurrences, provide invaluable information to estimate the past number of lineages. Here, we present new methodological developments around the fossilized birth–death process enabling us to (i) incorporate occurrence data in the likelihood function; (ii) consider piecewise-constant birth, death, and sampling rates; and (iii) estimate the past number of lineages, with or without knowledge of the underlying tree. We implement our method in the RevBayes software environment, enabling its use along with a large set of models of molecular and morphological evolution, and validate the inference workflow using simulations under a wide range of conditions. We finally illustrate our new implementation using two empirical data sets stemming from the fields of epidemiology and macroevolution. In epidemiology, we infer the prevalence of the coronavirus disease 2019 outbreak on the Diamond Princess ship, by taking into account jointly the case count record (occurrences) along with viral sequences for a fraction of infected individuals. In macroevolution, we infer the diversity trajectory of cetaceans using molecular and morphological data from extant taxa, morphological data from fossils, as well as numerous fossil occurrences. The joint modeling of occurrences and trees holds the promise to further bridge the gap between traditional epidemiology and pathogen genomics, as well as paleontology and molecular phylogenetics. [Birth–death model; epidemiology; fossils; macroevolution; occurrences; phylogenetics; skyline.] Oxford University Press 2022-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC9558841/ /pubmed/35608305 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syac037 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Systematic Biologists. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Regular Articles Andréoletti, Jérémy Zwaans, Antoine Warnock, Rachel C M Aguirre-Fernández, Gabriel Barido-Sottani, Joëlle Gupta, Ankit Stadler, Tanja Manceau, Marc The Occurrence Birth–Death Process for Combined-Evidence Analysis in Macroevolution and Epidemiology |
title | The Occurrence Birth–Death Process for Combined-Evidence Analysis in Macroevolution and Epidemiology |
title_full | The Occurrence Birth–Death Process for Combined-Evidence Analysis in Macroevolution and Epidemiology |
title_fullStr | The Occurrence Birth–Death Process for Combined-Evidence Analysis in Macroevolution and Epidemiology |
title_full_unstemmed | The Occurrence Birth–Death Process for Combined-Evidence Analysis in Macroevolution and Epidemiology |
title_short | The Occurrence Birth–Death Process for Combined-Evidence Analysis in Macroevolution and Epidemiology |
title_sort | occurrence birth–death process for combined-evidence analysis in macroevolution and epidemiology |
topic | Regular Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9558841/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35608305 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syac037 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT andreolettijeremy theoccurrencebirthdeathprocessforcombinedevidenceanalysisinmacroevolutionandepidemiology AT zwaansantoine theoccurrencebirthdeathprocessforcombinedevidenceanalysisinmacroevolutionandepidemiology AT warnockrachelcm theoccurrencebirthdeathprocessforcombinedevidenceanalysisinmacroevolutionandepidemiology AT aguirrefernandezgabriel theoccurrencebirthdeathprocessforcombinedevidenceanalysisinmacroevolutionandepidemiology AT baridosottanijoelle theoccurrencebirthdeathprocessforcombinedevidenceanalysisinmacroevolutionandepidemiology AT guptaankit theoccurrencebirthdeathprocessforcombinedevidenceanalysisinmacroevolutionandepidemiology AT stadlertanja theoccurrencebirthdeathprocessforcombinedevidenceanalysisinmacroevolutionandepidemiology AT manceaumarc theoccurrencebirthdeathprocessforcombinedevidenceanalysisinmacroevolutionandepidemiology AT andreolettijeremy occurrencebirthdeathprocessforcombinedevidenceanalysisinmacroevolutionandepidemiology AT zwaansantoine occurrencebirthdeathprocessforcombinedevidenceanalysisinmacroevolutionandepidemiology AT warnockrachelcm occurrencebirthdeathprocessforcombinedevidenceanalysisinmacroevolutionandepidemiology AT aguirrefernandezgabriel occurrencebirthdeathprocessforcombinedevidenceanalysisinmacroevolutionandepidemiology AT baridosottanijoelle occurrencebirthdeathprocessforcombinedevidenceanalysisinmacroevolutionandepidemiology AT guptaankit occurrencebirthdeathprocessforcombinedevidenceanalysisinmacroevolutionandepidemiology AT stadlertanja occurrencebirthdeathprocessforcombinedevidenceanalysisinmacroevolutionandepidemiology AT manceaumarc occurrencebirthdeathprocessforcombinedevidenceanalysisinmacroevolutionandepidemiology |