Cargando…
Postpartum Dyspareunia Following Continuous Versus Interrupted Perineal Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Research evaluating optimal repair techniques for the reduction of postpartum dyspareunia following obstetric laceration is severely limited. Prevailing guidelines from the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) are reliant on data from just nine clinical trials conducted from 19...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cureus
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9559366/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36259006 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.29070 |
_version_ | 1784807635022774272 |
---|---|
author | Schnittka, Emma M Lanpher, Nick W Patel, Praful |
author_facet | Schnittka, Emma M Lanpher, Nick W Patel, Praful |
author_sort | Schnittka, Emma M |
collection | PubMed |
description | Research evaluating optimal repair techniques for the reduction of postpartum dyspareunia following obstetric laceration is severely limited. Prevailing guidelines from the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) are reliant on data from just nine clinical trials conducted from 1980 to 2012. While the literature on this topic is still limited today, this review aims to synthesize data from past and present studies to ensure that standing clinical recommendations are supported by current literature. A review was conducted per Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar were searched. Included articles (1) compared continuous with interrupted repair techniques for subjects with episiotomies and/or second-degree tears, (2) were available in full length, and (3) reported dyspareunia as an outcome variable. Excluded articles were those (1) inclusive of first-, third-, or fourth-degree tears; (2) comparing suture material rather than technique; and (3) not available in English. A meta-analysis was conducted for both acute dyspareunia (<3 months) and chronic dyspareunia (>3 months) utilizing Meta-Essentials Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Corp., Redmond, WA) workbook. Bias was evaluated via Egger regression and Begg and Mazumdar rank correlation tests. Twelve articles met inclusion and exclusion guidelines, seven for acute dyspareunia and eight for chronic dyspareunia. All publications were randomized controlled trials and were inclusive of a total of 4,081 patients. Risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random effect model. Analysis revealed no statistically significant difference between continuous and interrupted suture groups for acute dyspareunia (RR: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.89-1.08) or chronic dyspareunia (RR: 0.96; 95% CI: 0.83-1.12). Egger regression test (p-value=0.534) and Begg and Mazumdar rank correlation test (p-value=0.570) indicated minimal publication bias. Compiled data does not indicate a preferential suture technique for the reduction of postpartum dyspareunia. These findings are congruent with the ACOG guidelines; therefore, there is no supporting evidence for ACOG's recommendation of continuous suturing to be overturned. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9559366 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Cureus |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95593662022-10-17 Postpartum Dyspareunia Following Continuous Versus Interrupted Perineal Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Schnittka, Emma M Lanpher, Nick W Patel, Praful Cureus Obstetrics/Gynecology Research evaluating optimal repair techniques for the reduction of postpartum dyspareunia following obstetric laceration is severely limited. Prevailing guidelines from the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) are reliant on data from just nine clinical trials conducted from 1980 to 2012. While the literature on this topic is still limited today, this review aims to synthesize data from past and present studies to ensure that standing clinical recommendations are supported by current literature. A review was conducted per Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar were searched. Included articles (1) compared continuous with interrupted repair techniques for subjects with episiotomies and/or second-degree tears, (2) were available in full length, and (3) reported dyspareunia as an outcome variable. Excluded articles were those (1) inclusive of first-, third-, or fourth-degree tears; (2) comparing suture material rather than technique; and (3) not available in English. A meta-analysis was conducted for both acute dyspareunia (<3 months) and chronic dyspareunia (>3 months) utilizing Meta-Essentials Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Corp., Redmond, WA) workbook. Bias was evaluated via Egger regression and Begg and Mazumdar rank correlation tests. Twelve articles met inclusion and exclusion guidelines, seven for acute dyspareunia and eight for chronic dyspareunia. All publications were randomized controlled trials and were inclusive of a total of 4,081 patients. Risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random effect model. Analysis revealed no statistically significant difference between continuous and interrupted suture groups for acute dyspareunia (RR: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.89-1.08) or chronic dyspareunia (RR: 0.96; 95% CI: 0.83-1.12). Egger regression test (p-value=0.534) and Begg and Mazumdar rank correlation test (p-value=0.570) indicated minimal publication bias. Compiled data does not indicate a preferential suture technique for the reduction of postpartum dyspareunia. These findings are congruent with the ACOG guidelines; therefore, there is no supporting evidence for ACOG's recommendation of continuous suturing to be overturned. Cureus 2022-09-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9559366/ /pubmed/36259006 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.29070 Text en Copyright © 2022, Schnittka et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Obstetrics/Gynecology Schnittka, Emma M Lanpher, Nick W Patel, Praful Postpartum Dyspareunia Following Continuous Versus Interrupted Perineal Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title | Postpartum Dyspareunia Following Continuous Versus Interrupted Perineal Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Postpartum Dyspareunia Following Continuous Versus Interrupted Perineal Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Postpartum Dyspareunia Following Continuous Versus Interrupted Perineal Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Postpartum Dyspareunia Following Continuous Versus Interrupted Perineal Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Postpartum Dyspareunia Following Continuous Versus Interrupted Perineal Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | postpartum dyspareunia following continuous versus interrupted perineal repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Obstetrics/Gynecology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9559366/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36259006 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.29070 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schnittkaemmam postpartumdyspareuniafollowingcontinuousversusinterruptedperinealrepairasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT lanphernickw postpartumdyspareuniafollowingcontinuousversusinterruptedperinealrepairasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT patelpraful postpartumdyspareuniafollowingcontinuousversusinterruptedperinealrepairasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |