Cargando…

BRCA Mutation Status in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Pivotal Role for Treatment Decision-Making

SIMPLE SUMMARY: In this retrospective observational study, we evaluated data from patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in order to better define the impact of germline BRCA1/2 (gBRCA1/2) mutation status on outcomes in this patient population...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pavese, Francesco, Capoluongo, Ettore Domenico, Muratore, Margherita, Minucci, Angelo, Santonocito, Concetta, Fuso, Paola, Concolino, Paola, Di Stasio, Enrico, Carbognin, Luisa, Tiberi, Giordana, Garganese, Giorgia, Corrado, Giacomo, Di Leone, Alba, Generali, Daniele, Fragomeni, Simona Maria, D’Angelo, Tatiana, Franceschini, Gianluca, Masetti, Riccardo, Fabi, Alessandra, Mulè, Antonino, Santoro, Angela, Belli, Paolo, Tortora, Giampaolo, Scambia, Giovanni, Paris, Ida
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9559391/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36230495
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14194571
_version_ 1784807640504729600
author Pavese, Francesco
Capoluongo, Ettore Domenico
Muratore, Margherita
Minucci, Angelo
Santonocito, Concetta
Fuso, Paola
Concolino, Paola
Di Stasio, Enrico
Carbognin, Luisa
Tiberi, Giordana
Garganese, Giorgia
Corrado, Giacomo
Di Leone, Alba
Generali, Daniele
Fragomeni, Simona Maria
D’Angelo, Tatiana
Franceschini, Gianluca
Masetti, Riccardo
Fabi, Alessandra
Mulè, Antonino
Santoro, Angela
Belli, Paolo
Tortora, Giampaolo
Scambia, Giovanni
Paris, Ida
author_facet Pavese, Francesco
Capoluongo, Ettore Domenico
Muratore, Margherita
Minucci, Angelo
Santonocito, Concetta
Fuso, Paola
Concolino, Paola
Di Stasio, Enrico
Carbognin, Luisa
Tiberi, Giordana
Garganese, Giorgia
Corrado, Giacomo
Di Leone, Alba
Generali, Daniele
Fragomeni, Simona Maria
D’Angelo, Tatiana
Franceschini, Gianluca
Masetti, Riccardo
Fabi, Alessandra
Mulè, Antonino
Santoro, Angela
Belli, Paolo
Tortora, Giampaolo
Scambia, Giovanni
Paris, Ida
author_sort Pavese, Francesco
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: In this retrospective observational study, we evaluated data from patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in order to better define the impact of germline BRCA1/2 (gBRCA1/2) mutation status on outcomes in this patient population. Our results show that patients with BRCA1/2 mutation had a higher pathologic complete response (pCR) rate than non-mutated patients; nevertheless, the benefit was confirmed only in the subset of patients who received a platinum-based NACT. Furthermore, pCR was associated with improved Event Free Survival (EFS) and Overall Survival (OS), regardless of BRCA1/2 mutation status and type of NACT received. Long-term follow-up analyses are needed to further define the impact of gBRCA mutation status in patients with early-TNBC. ABSTRACT: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is characterized by earlier recurrence and shorter survival compared with other types of breast cancer. Moreover, approximately 15 to 25% of all TNBC patients harbor germline BRCA (gBRCA) 1/2 mutations, which confer a more aggressive phenotype. However, TNBC seems to be particularly sensitive to chemotherapy, the so-called ‘triple negative paradox’. Therefore, Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is currently considered the preferred approach for early-stage TNBC. BRCA status has also been studied as a predictive biomarker of response to platinum compounds. Although several randomized trials investigated the addition of carboplatin to standard NACT in early-stage TNBC, the role of BRCA status remains unclear. In this retrospective analysis, we evaluated data from 136 consecutive patients with Stage I-III TNBC who received standard NACT with or without the addition of carboplatin, in order to define clinical features and outcomes in BRCA 1/2 mutation carriers and non-carrier controls. Between January 2013 and February 2021, 67 (51.3%) out of 136 patients received a standard anthracyclines/taxane regimen and 69 (50.7%) patients received a platinum-containing chemotherapy regimen. Deleterious germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations were identified in 39 (28.7%) patients. Overall, patients with deleterious gBRCA1/2 mutation have significantly higher pCR rate than non-carrier patients (23 [59%] of 39 vs. 33 [34%] of 97; p = 0.008). The benefit of harboring a gBRCA mutation was confirmed only in the subset of patients who received a platinum-based NACT (17 [65.4%] of 26 vs. 13 [30.2%] of 43; p = 0.005) while no differences were found in the platinum-free subgroup. Patients who achieved pCR after NACT had significantly better EFS (OR 4.5; 95% CI 1.9–10.7; p = 0.001) and OS (OR 3.3; 95% CI 1.3–8.9; p = 0.01) than patients who did not, regardless of BRCA1/2 mutation status and type of NACT received. Our results based on real-world evidence show that TNBC patients with the gBRCA1/2 mutation who received platinum-based NACT have a higher pCR rate than non-carrier patients, supporting the use of this chemotherapy regimen in this patient population. Long-term follow-up analyses are needed to further define the role of gBRCA mutation status on clinical outcomes in patients with early-TNBC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9559391
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95593912022-10-14 BRCA Mutation Status in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Pivotal Role for Treatment Decision-Making Pavese, Francesco Capoluongo, Ettore Domenico Muratore, Margherita Minucci, Angelo Santonocito, Concetta Fuso, Paola Concolino, Paola Di Stasio, Enrico Carbognin, Luisa Tiberi, Giordana Garganese, Giorgia Corrado, Giacomo Di Leone, Alba Generali, Daniele Fragomeni, Simona Maria D’Angelo, Tatiana Franceschini, Gianluca Masetti, Riccardo Fabi, Alessandra Mulè, Antonino Santoro, Angela Belli, Paolo Tortora, Giampaolo Scambia, Giovanni Paris, Ida Cancers (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: In this retrospective observational study, we evaluated data from patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in order to better define the impact of germline BRCA1/2 (gBRCA1/2) mutation status on outcomes in this patient population. Our results show that patients with BRCA1/2 mutation had a higher pathologic complete response (pCR) rate than non-mutated patients; nevertheless, the benefit was confirmed only in the subset of patients who received a platinum-based NACT. Furthermore, pCR was associated with improved Event Free Survival (EFS) and Overall Survival (OS), regardless of BRCA1/2 mutation status and type of NACT received. Long-term follow-up analyses are needed to further define the impact of gBRCA mutation status in patients with early-TNBC. ABSTRACT: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is characterized by earlier recurrence and shorter survival compared with other types of breast cancer. Moreover, approximately 15 to 25% of all TNBC patients harbor germline BRCA (gBRCA) 1/2 mutations, which confer a more aggressive phenotype. However, TNBC seems to be particularly sensitive to chemotherapy, the so-called ‘triple negative paradox’. Therefore, Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is currently considered the preferred approach for early-stage TNBC. BRCA status has also been studied as a predictive biomarker of response to platinum compounds. Although several randomized trials investigated the addition of carboplatin to standard NACT in early-stage TNBC, the role of BRCA status remains unclear. In this retrospective analysis, we evaluated data from 136 consecutive patients with Stage I-III TNBC who received standard NACT with or without the addition of carboplatin, in order to define clinical features and outcomes in BRCA 1/2 mutation carriers and non-carrier controls. Between January 2013 and February 2021, 67 (51.3%) out of 136 patients received a standard anthracyclines/taxane regimen and 69 (50.7%) patients received a platinum-containing chemotherapy regimen. Deleterious germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations were identified in 39 (28.7%) patients. Overall, patients with deleterious gBRCA1/2 mutation have significantly higher pCR rate than non-carrier patients (23 [59%] of 39 vs. 33 [34%] of 97; p = 0.008). The benefit of harboring a gBRCA mutation was confirmed only in the subset of patients who received a platinum-based NACT (17 [65.4%] of 26 vs. 13 [30.2%] of 43; p = 0.005) while no differences were found in the platinum-free subgroup. Patients who achieved pCR after NACT had significantly better EFS (OR 4.5; 95% CI 1.9–10.7; p = 0.001) and OS (OR 3.3; 95% CI 1.3–8.9; p = 0.01) than patients who did not, regardless of BRCA1/2 mutation status and type of NACT received. Our results based on real-world evidence show that TNBC patients with the gBRCA1/2 mutation who received platinum-based NACT have a higher pCR rate than non-carrier patients, supporting the use of this chemotherapy regimen in this patient population. Long-term follow-up analyses are needed to further define the role of gBRCA mutation status on clinical outcomes in patients with early-TNBC. MDPI 2022-09-21 /pmc/articles/PMC9559391/ /pubmed/36230495 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14194571 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Pavese, Francesco
Capoluongo, Ettore Domenico
Muratore, Margherita
Minucci, Angelo
Santonocito, Concetta
Fuso, Paola
Concolino, Paola
Di Stasio, Enrico
Carbognin, Luisa
Tiberi, Giordana
Garganese, Giorgia
Corrado, Giacomo
Di Leone, Alba
Generali, Daniele
Fragomeni, Simona Maria
D’Angelo, Tatiana
Franceschini, Gianluca
Masetti, Riccardo
Fabi, Alessandra
Mulè, Antonino
Santoro, Angela
Belli, Paolo
Tortora, Giampaolo
Scambia, Giovanni
Paris, Ida
BRCA Mutation Status in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Pivotal Role for Treatment Decision-Making
title BRCA Mutation Status in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Pivotal Role for Treatment Decision-Making
title_full BRCA Mutation Status in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Pivotal Role for Treatment Decision-Making
title_fullStr BRCA Mutation Status in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Pivotal Role for Treatment Decision-Making
title_full_unstemmed BRCA Mutation Status in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Pivotal Role for Treatment Decision-Making
title_short BRCA Mutation Status in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Pivotal Role for Treatment Decision-Making
title_sort brca mutation status in triple-negative breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a pivotal role for treatment decision-making
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9559391/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36230495
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14194571
work_keys_str_mv AT pavesefrancesco brcamutationstatusintriplenegativebreastcancerpatientstreatedwithneoadjuvantchemotherapyapivotalrolefortreatmentdecisionmaking
AT capoluongoettoredomenico brcamutationstatusintriplenegativebreastcancerpatientstreatedwithneoadjuvantchemotherapyapivotalrolefortreatmentdecisionmaking
AT muratoremargherita brcamutationstatusintriplenegativebreastcancerpatientstreatedwithneoadjuvantchemotherapyapivotalrolefortreatmentdecisionmaking
AT minucciangelo brcamutationstatusintriplenegativebreastcancerpatientstreatedwithneoadjuvantchemotherapyapivotalrolefortreatmentdecisionmaking
AT santonocitoconcetta brcamutationstatusintriplenegativebreastcancerpatientstreatedwithneoadjuvantchemotherapyapivotalrolefortreatmentdecisionmaking
AT fusopaola brcamutationstatusintriplenegativebreastcancerpatientstreatedwithneoadjuvantchemotherapyapivotalrolefortreatmentdecisionmaking
AT concolinopaola brcamutationstatusintriplenegativebreastcancerpatientstreatedwithneoadjuvantchemotherapyapivotalrolefortreatmentdecisionmaking
AT distasioenrico brcamutationstatusintriplenegativebreastcancerpatientstreatedwithneoadjuvantchemotherapyapivotalrolefortreatmentdecisionmaking
AT carbogninluisa brcamutationstatusintriplenegativebreastcancerpatientstreatedwithneoadjuvantchemotherapyapivotalrolefortreatmentdecisionmaking
AT tiberigiordana brcamutationstatusintriplenegativebreastcancerpatientstreatedwithneoadjuvantchemotherapyapivotalrolefortreatmentdecisionmaking
AT garganesegiorgia brcamutationstatusintriplenegativebreastcancerpatientstreatedwithneoadjuvantchemotherapyapivotalrolefortreatmentdecisionmaking
AT corradogiacomo brcamutationstatusintriplenegativebreastcancerpatientstreatedwithneoadjuvantchemotherapyapivotalrolefortreatmentdecisionmaking
AT dileonealba brcamutationstatusintriplenegativebreastcancerpatientstreatedwithneoadjuvantchemotherapyapivotalrolefortreatmentdecisionmaking
AT generalidaniele brcamutationstatusintriplenegativebreastcancerpatientstreatedwithneoadjuvantchemotherapyapivotalrolefortreatmentdecisionmaking
AT fragomenisimonamaria brcamutationstatusintriplenegativebreastcancerpatientstreatedwithneoadjuvantchemotherapyapivotalrolefortreatmentdecisionmaking
AT dangelotatiana brcamutationstatusintriplenegativebreastcancerpatientstreatedwithneoadjuvantchemotherapyapivotalrolefortreatmentdecisionmaking
AT franceschinigianluca brcamutationstatusintriplenegativebreastcancerpatientstreatedwithneoadjuvantchemotherapyapivotalrolefortreatmentdecisionmaking
AT masettiriccardo brcamutationstatusintriplenegativebreastcancerpatientstreatedwithneoadjuvantchemotherapyapivotalrolefortreatmentdecisionmaking
AT fabialessandra brcamutationstatusintriplenegativebreastcancerpatientstreatedwithneoadjuvantchemotherapyapivotalrolefortreatmentdecisionmaking
AT muleantonino brcamutationstatusintriplenegativebreastcancerpatientstreatedwithneoadjuvantchemotherapyapivotalrolefortreatmentdecisionmaking
AT santoroangela brcamutationstatusintriplenegativebreastcancerpatientstreatedwithneoadjuvantchemotherapyapivotalrolefortreatmentdecisionmaking
AT bellipaolo brcamutationstatusintriplenegativebreastcancerpatientstreatedwithneoadjuvantchemotherapyapivotalrolefortreatmentdecisionmaking
AT tortoragiampaolo brcamutationstatusintriplenegativebreastcancerpatientstreatedwithneoadjuvantchemotherapyapivotalrolefortreatmentdecisionmaking
AT scambiagiovanni brcamutationstatusintriplenegativebreastcancerpatientstreatedwithneoadjuvantchemotherapyapivotalrolefortreatmentdecisionmaking
AT parisida brcamutationstatusintriplenegativebreastcancerpatientstreatedwithneoadjuvantchemotherapyapivotalrolefortreatmentdecisionmaking