Cargando…

Breast-Specific Gamma Imaging: An Added Value in the Diagnosis of Breast Cancer, a Systematic Review

SIMPLE SUMMARY: Breast-specific gamma imaging represents an emergent instrument for breast cancer detection. We selected on Medline articles published from 1995 to 2022 that compare various imaging modalities with breast-specific gamma imaging. The aim of this paper was to assess if this imaging met...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: De Feo, Maria Silvia, Sidrak, Marko Magdi Abdou, Conte, Miriam, Frantellizzi, Viviana, Marongiu, Andrea, De Cristofaro, Flaminia, Nuvoli, Susanna, Spanu, Angela, De Vincentis, Giuseppe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9559460/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36230540
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14194619
_version_ 1784807644699033600
author De Feo, Maria Silvia
Sidrak, Marko Magdi Abdou
Conte, Miriam
Frantellizzi, Viviana
Marongiu, Andrea
De Cristofaro, Flaminia
Nuvoli, Susanna
Spanu, Angela
De Vincentis, Giuseppe
author_facet De Feo, Maria Silvia
Sidrak, Marko Magdi Abdou
Conte, Miriam
Frantellizzi, Viviana
Marongiu, Andrea
De Cristofaro, Flaminia
Nuvoli, Susanna
Spanu, Angela
De Vincentis, Giuseppe
author_sort De Feo, Maria Silvia
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: Breast-specific gamma imaging represents an emergent instrument for breast cancer detection. We selected on Medline articles published from 1995 to 2022 that compare various imaging modalities with breast-specific gamma imaging. The aim of this paper was to assess if this imaging method is a more valuable choice in detecting breast malignant lesions compared to morphological counterparts such mammography, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging in terms of specificity, sensibility and positive and negative predictive value. At the cost of a major radiology burden, breast-specific gamma imaging is more specific, with a sensibility comparable to magnetic resonance imaging and higher than ultrasonography and mammography. ABSTRACT: Purpose: Breast cancer is the most common solid tumor and the second highest cause of death in the United States. Detection and diagnosis of breast tumors includes various imaging modalities, such as mammography (MMG), ultrasound (US), and contrast-enhancement MRI. Breast-specific gamma imaging (BSGI) is an emerging tool, whereas morphological imaging has the disadvantage of a higher absorbed dose. Our aim was to assess if this imaging method is a more valuable choice in detecting breast malignant lesions compared to morphological counterparts. Methods: research on Medline from 1995 to June 2022 was conducted. Studies that compared at least one anatomical imaging modality with BSGI were screened and assessed through QUADAS2 for risk of bias and applicability concerns assessment. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value (PPV and NPV) were reported. Results: A total of 15 studies compared BSGI with MMG, US, and MRI. BSGI sensitivity was similar to MRI, but specificity was higher. Specificity was always higher than MMG and US. BSGI had higher PPV and NPV. When used for the evaluation of a suspected breast lesion, the overall sensitivity was better than the examined overall sensitivity when BSGI was excluded. Risk of bias and applicability concerns domain showed mainly low risk of bias. Conclusion: BSGI is a valuable imaging modality with similar sensitivity to MRI but higher specificity, although at the cost of higher radiation burden.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9559460
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95594602022-10-14 Breast-Specific Gamma Imaging: An Added Value in the Diagnosis of Breast Cancer, a Systematic Review De Feo, Maria Silvia Sidrak, Marko Magdi Abdou Conte, Miriam Frantellizzi, Viviana Marongiu, Andrea De Cristofaro, Flaminia Nuvoli, Susanna Spanu, Angela De Vincentis, Giuseppe Cancers (Basel) Systematic Review SIMPLE SUMMARY: Breast-specific gamma imaging represents an emergent instrument for breast cancer detection. We selected on Medline articles published from 1995 to 2022 that compare various imaging modalities with breast-specific gamma imaging. The aim of this paper was to assess if this imaging method is a more valuable choice in detecting breast malignant lesions compared to morphological counterparts such mammography, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging in terms of specificity, sensibility and positive and negative predictive value. At the cost of a major radiology burden, breast-specific gamma imaging is more specific, with a sensibility comparable to magnetic resonance imaging and higher than ultrasonography and mammography. ABSTRACT: Purpose: Breast cancer is the most common solid tumor and the second highest cause of death in the United States. Detection and diagnosis of breast tumors includes various imaging modalities, such as mammography (MMG), ultrasound (US), and contrast-enhancement MRI. Breast-specific gamma imaging (BSGI) is an emerging tool, whereas morphological imaging has the disadvantage of a higher absorbed dose. Our aim was to assess if this imaging method is a more valuable choice in detecting breast malignant lesions compared to morphological counterparts. Methods: research on Medline from 1995 to June 2022 was conducted. Studies that compared at least one anatomical imaging modality with BSGI were screened and assessed through QUADAS2 for risk of bias and applicability concerns assessment. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value (PPV and NPV) were reported. Results: A total of 15 studies compared BSGI with MMG, US, and MRI. BSGI sensitivity was similar to MRI, but specificity was higher. Specificity was always higher than MMG and US. BSGI had higher PPV and NPV. When used for the evaluation of a suspected breast lesion, the overall sensitivity was better than the examined overall sensitivity when BSGI was excluded. Risk of bias and applicability concerns domain showed mainly low risk of bias. Conclusion: BSGI is a valuable imaging modality with similar sensitivity to MRI but higher specificity, although at the cost of higher radiation burden. MDPI 2022-09-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9559460/ /pubmed/36230540 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14194619 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Systematic Review
De Feo, Maria Silvia
Sidrak, Marko Magdi Abdou
Conte, Miriam
Frantellizzi, Viviana
Marongiu, Andrea
De Cristofaro, Flaminia
Nuvoli, Susanna
Spanu, Angela
De Vincentis, Giuseppe
Breast-Specific Gamma Imaging: An Added Value in the Diagnosis of Breast Cancer, a Systematic Review
title Breast-Specific Gamma Imaging: An Added Value in the Diagnosis of Breast Cancer, a Systematic Review
title_full Breast-Specific Gamma Imaging: An Added Value in the Diagnosis of Breast Cancer, a Systematic Review
title_fullStr Breast-Specific Gamma Imaging: An Added Value in the Diagnosis of Breast Cancer, a Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Breast-Specific Gamma Imaging: An Added Value in the Diagnosis of Breast Cancer, a Systematic Review
title_short Breast-Specific Gamma Imaging: An Added Value in the Diagnosis of Breast Cancer, a Systematic Review
title_sort breast-specific gamma imaging: an added value in the diagnosis of breast cancer, a systematic review
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9559460/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36230540
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers14194619
work_keys_str_mv AT defeomariasilvia breastspecificgammaimaginganaddedvalueinthediagnosisofbreastcancerasystematicreview
AT sidrakmarkomagdiabdou breastspecificgammaimaginganaddedvalueinthediagnosisofbreastcancerasystematicreview
AT contemiriam breastspecificgammaimaginganaddedvalueinthediagnosisofbreastcancerasystematicreview
AT frantellizziviviana breastspecificgammaimaginganaddedvalueinthediagnosisofbreastcancerasystematicreview
AT marongiuandrea breastspecificgammaimaginganaddedvalueinthediagnosisofbreastcancerasystematicreview
AT decristofaroflaminia breastspecificgammaimaginganaddedvalueinthediagnosisofbreastcancerasystematicreview
AT nuvolisusanna breastspecificgammaimaginganaddedvalueinthediagnosisofbreastcancerasystematicreview
AT spanuangela breastspecificgammaimaginganaddedvalueinthediagnosisofbreastcancerasystematicreview
AT devincentisgiuseppe breastspecificgammaimaginganaddedvalueinthediagnosisofbreastcancerasystematicreview