Employment among Childhood Cancer Survivors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

SIMPLE SUMMARY: Despite the improvements in the survival rates and functional outcomes of childhood cancer survivors (CCS), most of them experience late effects with possible consequences to their occupational status. To date, a reliable estimate of the prevalence of employment among this population is still missing. This study aimed to assess, for the first time, the prevalence of employment among CCS and to examine the associations of socio-demographic and clinical factors with employment. Almost 100 cohorts worldwide have been included in this review, highlighting that two-thirds of childhood cancer survivors were employed. Different employment rates depending on socio-demographic and clinical factors were identified. The findings from this study could facilitate the design of targeted interventions aimed at promoting employment among CCS. ABSTRACT: To date, there are heterogeneous studies related to childhood cancer survivors’ (CCS) employment rates. Given the importance of this topic, we aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the prevalence of employment among CCS and to examine its association with socio-demographic and clinical factors. We followed the PRISMA guidelines to search for pertinent articles in relevant electronic databases. Eighty-nine articles comprising 93 cohorts were included. The overall prevalence of employment was 66% (CI: 95% 0.63–0.69). Subgroup meta-analyses showed that lower rates were found for central nervous system tumor survivors (51%, CI: 95% 0.43–0.59), and for CCS treated with cranial-radiotherapy (53%, CI: 95% 0.42–0.64) or haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (56%, CI: 95% 0.46–0.65). The studies conducted in Asia highlighted employment rates of 47% (CI: 95%, 0.34–0.60). Univariate meta-regressions identified the following socio-demographic factors associated with higher rates of employment: a female gender (p = 0.046), a higher mean age at the time of investigation (p = 0.00), a longer time since diagnosis (p = 0.00), a higher educational level (p = 0.03), and a married status (p = 0.00). In conclusion, this systematic review and meta-analysis provides evidence that two-thirds of CCS are employed worldwide. Identifying vulnerable groups of CCS may allow for the design of multidisciplinary support strategies and interventions to promote employment in this population.