Cargando…

Clinical analysis of women with ovarian pregnancy: a retrospective case–control study

BACKGROUND: To address the clinical features and potential risk factors of ovarian pregnancy (OP). METHODS: In this retrospective case–control study performed in West China Second University Hospital from March 17, 2005 to December 8, 2018, 146 OP patients were selected as a case group, 292 patients...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Hongyi, Liu, Yu, Yang, Yang, Zhao, Xia, Qi, Xiaorong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9560037/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36229794
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-05099-8
_version_ 1784807737571409920
author Li, Hongyi
Liu, Yu
Yang, Yang
Zhao, Xia
Qi, Xiaorong
author_facet Li, Hongyi
Liu, Yu
Yang, Yang
Zhao, Xia
Qi, Xiaorong
author_sort Li, Hongyi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To address the clinical features and potential risk factors of ovarian pregnancy (OP). METHODS: In this retrospective case–control study performed in West China Second University Hospital from March 17, 2005 to December 8, 2018, 146 OP patients were selected as a case group, 292 patients with tubal pregnancy (TP) and 292 women with intrauterine pregnancy (IUP) were matched as controls at a ratio of 1:2:2. RESULTS: When compared with TP patients, OP patients tend to have worse clinical complications (hemorrhagic shock (7.41% vs 2.89%), rupture of pregnancy sac (54.07% vs 37.78%), hemoperitoneum (363.1 ± 35.46 ml vs 239.3 ± 27.61 ml) and increased need for emergency laparotomy (9.60% vs 3.97%) at an early gestational age. Assisted reproductive technology (ART) (adjusted OR1 2.08, 95%CI 1.04 to 4.18; adjusted OR2 2.59, 95%CI 1.25 to 5.37) and intrauterine contraceptive device (IUD) use (adjusted OR1 2.19, 95%CI 1.10 to 4.36; adjusted OR2 2.77, 95%CI 1.74 to 5.71) may be risk factors for ovarian ectopic pregnancy as compared to the control groups of TP and IUP patients. CONCLUSIONS: OP patients tend to have more severe clinical complications and this study has identified ART and IUD use as potential risk factors for OP. Results of this study may contribute to improve the understanding of OP and promote early surgical intervention. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12884-022-05099-8.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9560037
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-95600372022-10-14 Clinical analysis of women with ovarian pregnancy: a retrospective case–control study Li, Hongyi Liu, Yu Yang, Yang Zhao, Xia Qi, Xiaorong BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research BACKGROUND: To address the clinical features and potential risk factors of ovarian pregnancy (OP). METHODS: In this retrospective case–control study performed in West China Second University Hospital from March 17, 2005 to December 8, 2018, 146 OP patients were selected as a case group, 292 patients with tubal pregnancy (TP) and 292 women with intrauterine pregnancy (IUP) were matched as controls at a ratio of 1:2:2. RESULTS: When compared with TP patients, OP patients tend to have worse clinical complications (hemorrhagic shock (7.41% vs 2.89%), rupture of pregnancy sac (54.07% vs 37.78%), hemoperitoneum (363.1 ± 35.46 ml vs 239.3 ± 27.61 ml) and increased need for emergency laparotomy (9.60% vs 3.97%) at an early gestational age. Assisted reproductive technology (ART) (adjusted OR1 2.08, 95%CI 1.04 to 4.18; adjusted OR2 2.59, 95%CI 1.25 to 5.37) and intrauterine contraceptive device (IUD) use (adjusted OR1 2.19, 95%CI 1.10 to 4.36; adjusted OR2 2.77, 95%CI 1.74 to 5.71) may be risk factors for ovarian ectopic pregnancy as compared to the control groups of TP and IUP patients. CONCLUSIONS: OP patients tend to have more severe clinical complications and this study has identified ART and IUD use as potential risk factors for OP. Results of this study may contribute to improve the understanding of OP and promote early surgical intervention. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12884-022-05099-8. BioMed Central 2022-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9560037/ /pubmed/36229794 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-05099-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Li, Hongyi
Liu, Yu
Yang, Yang
Zhao, Xia
Qi, Xiaorong
Clinical analysis of women with ovarian pregnancy: a retrospective case–control study
title Clinical analysis of women with ovarian pregnancy: a retrospective case–control study
title_full Clinical analysis of women with ovarian pregnancy: a retrospective case–control study
title_fullStr Clinical analysis of women with ovarian pregnancy: a retrospective case–control study
title_full_unstemmed Clinical analysis of women with ovarian pregnancy: a retrospective case–control study
title_short Clinical analysis of women with ovarian pregnancy: a retrospective case–control study
title_sort clinical analysis of women with ovarian pregnancy: a retrospective case–control study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9560037/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36229794
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-05099-8
work_keys_str_mv AT lihongyi clinicalanalysisofwomenwithovarianpregnancyaretrospectivecasecontrolstudy
AT liuyu clinicalanalysisofwomenwithovarianpregnancyaretrospectivecasecontrolstudy
AT yangyang clinicalanalysisofwomenwithovarianpregnancyaretrospectivecasecontrolstudy
AT zhaoxia clinicalanalysisofwomenwithovarianpregnancyaretrospectivecasecontrolstudy
AT qixiaorong clinicalanalysisofwomenwithovarianpregnancyaretrospectivecasecontrolstudy