Cargando…
Clinical analysis of women with ovarian pregnancy: a retrospective case–control study
BACKGROUND: To address the clinical features and potential risk factors of ovarian pregnancy (OP). METHODS: In this retrospective case–control study performed in West China Second University Hospital from March 17, 2005 to December 8, 2018, 146 OP patients were selected as a case group, 292 patients...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9560037/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36229794 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-05099-8 |
_version_ | 1784807737571409920 |
---|---|
author | Li, Hongyi Liu, Yu Yang, Yang Zhao, Xia Qi, Xiaorong |
author_facet | Li, Hongyi Liu, Yu Yang, Yang Zhao, Xia Qi, Xiaorong |
author_sort | Li, Hongyi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To address the clinical features and potential risk factors of ovarian pregnancy (OP). METHODS: In this retrospective case–control study performed in West China Second University Hospital from March 17, 2005 to December 8, 2018, 146 OP patients were selected as a case group, 292 patients with tubal pregnancy (TP) and 292 women with intrauterine pregnancy (IUP) were matched as controls at a ratio of 1:2:2. RESULTS: When compared with TP patients, OP patients tend to have worse clinical complications (hemorrhagic shock (7.41% vs 2.89%), rupture of pregnancy sac (54.07% vs 37.78%), hemoperitoneum (363.1 ± 35.46 ml vs 239.3 ± 27.61 ml) and increased need for emergency laparotomy (9.60% vs 3.97%) at an early gestational age. Assisted reproductive technology (ART) (adjusted OR1 2.08, 95%CI 1.04 to 4.18; adjusted OR2 2.59, 95%CI 1.25 to 5.37) and intrauterine contraceptive device (IUD) use (adjusted OR1 2.19, 95%CI 1.10 to 4.36; adjusted OR2 2.77, 95%CI 1.74 to 5.71) may be risk factors for ovarian ectopic pregnancy as compared to the control groups of TP and IUP patients. CONCLUSIONS: OP patients tend to have more severe clinical complications and this study has identified ART and IUD use as potential risk factors for OP. Results of this study may contribute to improve the understanding of OP and promote early surgical intervention. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12884-022-05099-8. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9560037 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-95600372022-10-14 Clinical analysis of women with ovarian pregnancy: a retrospective case–control study Li, Hongyi Liu, Yu Yang, Yang Zhao, Xia Qi, Xiaorong BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research BACKGROUND: To address the clinical features and potential risk factors of ovarian pregnancy (OP). METHODS: In this retrospective case–control study performed in West China Second University Hospital from March 17, 2005 to December 8, 2018, 146 OP patients were selected as a case group, 292 patients with tubal pregnancy (TP) and 292 women with intrauterine pregnancy (IUP) were matched as controls at a ratio of 1:2:2. RESULTS: When compared with TP patients, OP patients tend to have worse clinical complications (hemorrhagic shock (7.41% vs 2.89%), rupture of pregnancy sac (54.07% vs 37.78%), hemoperitoneum (363.1 ± 35.46 ml vs 239.3 ± 27.61 ml) and increased need for emergency laparotomy (9.60% vs 3.97%) at an early gestational age. Assisted reproductive technology (ART) (adjusted OR1 2.08, 95%CI 1.04 to 4.18; adjusted OR2 2.59, 95%CI 1.25 to 5.37) and intrauterine contraceptive device (IUD) use (adjusted OR1 2.19, 95%CI 1.10 to 4.36; adjusted OR2 2.77, 95%CI 1.74 to 5.71) may be risk factors for ovarian ectopic pregnancy as compared to the control groups of TP and IUP patients. CONCLUSIONS: OP patients tend to have more severe clinical complications and this study has identified ART and IUD use as potential risk factors for OP. Results of this study may contribute to improve the understanding of OP and promote early surgical intervention. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12884-022-05099-8. BioMed Central 2022-10-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9560037/ /pubmed/36229794 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-05099-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Li, Hongyi Liu, Yu Yang, Yang Zhao, Xia Qi, Xiaorong Clinical analysis of women with ovarian pregnancy: a retrospective case–control study |
title | Clinical analysis of women with ovarian pregnancy: a retrospective case–control study |
title_full | Clinical analysis of women with ovarian pregnancy: a retrospective case–control study |
title_fullStr | Clinical analysis of women with ovarian pregnancy: a retrospective case–control study |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical analysis of women with ovarian pregnancy: a retrospective case–control study |
title_short | Clinical analysis of women with ovarian pregnancy: a retrospective case–control study |
title_sort | clinical analysis of women with ovarian pregnancy: a retrospective case–control study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9560037/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36229794 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-05099-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lihongyi clinicalanalysisofwomenwithovarianpregnancyaretrospectivecasecontrolstudy AT liuyu clinicalanalysisofwomenwithovarianpregnancyaretrospectivecasecontrolstudy AT yangyang clinicalanalysisofwomenwithovarianpregnancyaretrospectivecasecontrolstudy AT zhaoxia clinicalanalysisofwomenwithovarianpregnancyaretrospectivecasecontrolstudy AT qixiaorong clinicalanalysisofwomenwithovarianpregnancyaretrospectivecasecontrolstudy |